Here's another similar story. This guy stuffed a santa suit, hung it from a cross and planted it in his front yard to protest rabid holiday consumerism. People are complaining about it, not because it desecrates the cross, but because they have to answer their kid's questions about why santa is on a cross and not at the North Pole.
Article about Crucified Santa
Excerpt:
Quote:A neighbour complained to the municipality and but was told Metchosin couldn't do anything because the cross is on Wright's property.
Earlier in the afternoon, Wright had a visit from the pastor of St. Mary's Anglican Church.
"He said he had some parishioners who are concerned about it and don't know what to make of it."
Wright, who was raised a Catholic, said Christmas is very important to him, but he stopped buying presents years ago.
"I used to love Christmas, but when you think about it, I loved it for the wrong reason," laughed the 69-year-old artist. "But you learn with age."
Same type of creative protest with the double-edged sword. If the victim of the protest complains, they find themselves hypocrites.
Excellent chess game. They've both been checkmated. This one is especially good because it smites several traditions.
Can't complain about the crucifixion of santa if you think the cross has been desecrated because it is supposed to reinforce the idea that Christmas is about christianity, not shopping.
Can't complain about the religious protest because it is not on public land.
Can't complain about it being santa on there and unfairly dishonest for the kids if parents are lying to them about the existence of santa claus.
Excellent strategies for both of these protests. For those having trouble viewing the ACLU protest scene, here's a photo from that site for comparison.