sozobe wrote:Monger had a topic with an article about "straight" women being more frequently aroused by other women than "straight" men being aroused by other men, with some musing that it might be an evolutionary survival mechanism.
Survival mechanism? Or a question of which is more or less accepted? To overall be a "straight" woman but occassionally also fall for other women seems to have gotten to be, like, prerequisite #1 to being hip, or something. Forget "taboo" - this is something you'd flaunt! Whereas the other way around ...
I agree about putting "straight" in quotes ... Somehow this bipolar, either you're straight or you're gay-thing seems unnatural to me, though I can see why both straights and gays have a big stake in keeping kind of clarity in place: it's the "born this way" certainty that keeps gays from having to defend their "choice" and keeps straights from, well, worrying about being gay ;-).
I always held by this theory that everybody is in principle bisexual, myself - just that we're all on different places on the overall scale from one end to the other. With that theory in mind, I've also always been kinda prepared for the off-chance that I might fall in love with a guy some time as well.
I must add, though, that, in something of a refutation of the theory, I never did meet any ... just women, all down the line.