0
   

rioting in Benton Harbor

 
 
sweetcomplication
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 07:12 am
edgarblythe wrote:
It was late and I was tired, sweet. I had to leave it til I could concentrate on the information. I will check it more closely today.


thank you, EB, just picked up your above message; I think I got my feelings hurt a bit again, but, I should have realized at least you, of all people, would actually take the time . . . love ya'
0 Replies
 
mac11
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 07:34 am
sweet - It looks like a great site. It will take time to explore, though - lots of information there.
0 Replies
 
sweetcomplication
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 07:37 am
Embarrassed Thank you, Mac; between you and EB, I feel much better now :wink: !
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 09:45 am
Excuse me Sweet, but you insulted me first. Please go back and reread the thread.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 10:11 am
Aw, Jesus Christ...
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:05 am
Snood, you're like a left wing Bill O'Reilly the way you manage your threads. Get a grip.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:08 am
I'd like to "get a grip" Of your frikkin' windpipe, you miserable, troublemaking wretch.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:11 am
cjhsa
Are you here to foment trouble or what?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:17 am
Absolutely when I post a decent response, get insulted, and then continue to do so.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:19 am
That a threat, Snood?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:26 am
edgar - He's like a cloud, blowing around, seeking a doorway to darken.

...came into this thread with his mind made up, closed and bitter - will probably leave that way.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:29 am
Best to avoid the thread for a day or so.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:31 am
Probably right. Or at least until there is substantive change in the developing story.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:37 am
Yet another insult...comon guys, can't you do better than that?
0 Replies
 
Anonymous
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:39 am
cjhsa wrote:
Yet another insult...comon guys, can't you do better than that?


How about doing better by stopping the insult train? And let's not talk about who started it or anything else like that. Just let the taunting end here. Thank you.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 11:52 am
Yes, Leesen to Imoderator (apologies to Iman)....I was just getting interested in this thread, and would like to continue following the story without interruptions. Thanks in advance.
0 Replies
 
Scrat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 01:04 pm
snood wrote:
You're not just reading me wrong, by your post I'm wondering if you're reading at all. I didn't say anything about "seeking" any charges.

snood wrote:
I'm interested in any charges of police misconduct.

I read that to mean you are seeking information on any charges of police misconduct. Do I really have to use the exact wording you used to avoid a reprimand? Confused

I meant no offense, it simply appears that you bring a bias to this discussion and asked others to avoid doing so. I thought that impression was worth mentioning.
0 Replies
 
Scrat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 01:11 pm
snood wrote:
...came into this thread with his mind made up, closed and bitter - will probably leave that way.

I can't help thinking that this describes you, snood. I don't mean that as an insult, but it seems clear to me that you lean towards absolving the rioters of responsibility for their own actions and have a prejudice towards assuming the cops are at fault in this.

Now, if I am wrong in that, please simply tell me. I will take your word on it. Honestly. But from what you've written thus far in this thread, that is the impression I get.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 04:27 pm
Scrat wrote:
snood wrote:
...came into this thread with his mind made up, closed and bitter - will probably leave that way.

I can't help thinking that this describes you, snood. I don't mean that as an insult, but it seems clear to me that you lean towards absolving the rioters of responsibility for their own actions and have a prejudice towards assuming the cops are at fault in this.

Now, if I am wrong in that, please simply tell me. I will take your word on it. Honestly. But from what you've written thus far in this thread, that is the impression I get.


Tell you what - meet you halfway. I won't read into your words and you don't read into mine - we'll comment on the story as it develops, and say what we think about that, and not each other. Can you handle that?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2003 04:52 pm
I read snood's words to mean he was watching to see if anything like that developed, not that he was demanding same.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 11:09:01