O.J. tells how he did it.

Chai Tea wrote:

ooooo.....let's all talk about michael jackson now!

he's a pedaphile you know....got away with it too.

That is because he is white enough now , we blacks dont associate with him no mo

Chai Tea wrote:

I's gots my OWN and its OPI .......... just like you white people wear.

I aint cheap

You down wit opp? oh...opi....sorry.

You down wit opp? oh...opi....sorry.

There were some conflicting areas of evidence that we seem to forget.

1The sock with Nicole's blood was probably a plant. The blood soaked from one side of the sock ankle to the other. This could not have happened that way if OJ's foot was in the sock. Forensics showed that the sock was laid down and then some blood was poured on it. (Where did they get the blood)

The blood in the van was obviously splattered by an inept person because it indicated a trajectory from a source. Sort of like a priest flinging "holy water"

Besides OJ trying on the leather glove, the Corchoran team had traces of his hand and the glove. It was clearly too small and not a fit. It really wsnt his glove. Remember, that was a piece of evidence that was presented as a "final show" had it been brought up in a normal context there wouldnt have been any confusion. It would have meant perhaps that OJ merely got a pair of too small glove and , with a plastic butchers glove on underneath, the leather glove could have slipped over it easily enough.
However, it was an end game ploy by Corchoran, it merely added to the pile of controveresy about the validity of all the cops evidence, and it worked.

Probably about 75% of the evidence was good and solid and the other 25% was either planted or messed up deliberately.
The name of the game in the US is "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt", which implies a unanimous decision. The jury mostly "believed " that he was guilty but they had these pieces of evidence that seemed to be planted in order to expidite the decision.A few of them said that they had to deal with this issue of "reasonable doubt". It was an issue that the defense team exploited quite well. OJ wasnt found innocent, he was not guilty by reasonable doubt. The indictment was on the cops.

The fact that we showed this almost gavel to gavel was a bit excessive but I think it helped people all over the world understand how our justice system works, warts and all.

.Ifeel sorry that OJ got off, but even if you could separate the "bad" evidence from the "good" you are still left with a possibility that some other evidence was also tainted ,so the jury sent a message to the Prosecutors that their entire batch of evidence couldnt be trusted
In the civil case the rule is "the preponderence of evidence " The jury decision is by a majority rule, not unanimity.

This case is now textbook for forensics and especially in the areas of " evidence tampering", "Chain of Custody", and "spatter patterns"

Oh, YUCK!

Can he be held accountable?

Oh, the wink wink nudge nudge here makes me positively ill. Gack.

I'm wondering how much more Nicole and Ron Goldmans family can take of stuff like this.

I hope people boycott this book, if there really is one.

And who is the thoughtless idiot that agreed to write this book for OJ? I imagine there was an author as OJ is not a writer himself - and the publisher for that matter.

Boycott the lot - I say!

Are you thinking the cops did a bit of cooking especially because they wanted to make sure they got OJ?


Or might planted evidence be routine for LAPD, do you think?

Quote:

Are you thinking the cops did a bit of cooking especially because they wanted to make sure they got OJ?


Or might planted evidence be routine for LAPD, do you think?

I attended a couple of forensic analyses (post -game kinda stuff) that went over some of the more blatant errors, omissions, and outright fraudulent acts that LAPD Crime investigation teams pulled. There wasnt a clearcut evidence of a systemic "cooking", but there were enough items that showed that someone or a group of someones had tampered with the evidence and actualy had planted some evidence.

Mark Furman was a lightning rod because of his unfortunate use of the n word sometime during his career. from what Ive been shown as evidence tampering, he wasnt even around when evidence could have been messed with.

I think that most people are convinced that OJ did it but the dirfference is that many people , black and white (including me) are even more suspicious of the cops in this one. OJ got off because the system didnt value accuracy and integrity. The system had a relatively good case on OJ but someone decided to really manufacture some more evidence that just threw the really good stuff into question.

WWhat the cops didnt relize was that the same science that makes forensics work, can also detect the errors in the very forensics chain . We know that about 25% of the evidence didnt fit the timelines, wasnt properly custodied, and was even totally out of sequence(as if it were added in sometime later)

The defense team did exactly what it was supposed to do, they capitolized on the bogus and got a murderer (probable murderer) off.

Placing some system of higher accountability on the cops should go without question, however, because they are composed of the same diverse mess of people as are waiters, doctors, used car salesmen, and nuclear scientists, they can sometimes stray from the proper path.
Many states now have "OJ influence rules" that require double chains of custody on evidence, and a number of other boring but necessary requirements in rules of evidence.

Quote:

Are you thinking the cops did a bit of cooking especially because they wanted to make sure they got OJ?


Or might planted evidence be routine for LAPD, do you think?

I attended a couple of forensic analyses (post -game kinda stuff) that went over some of the more blatant errors, omissions, and outright fraudulent acts that LAPD Crime investigation teams pulled. There wasnt a clearcut evidence of a systemic "cooking", but there were enough items that showed that someone or a group of someones had tampered with the evidence and actualy had planted some evidence.

Mark Furman was a lightning rod because of his unfortunate use of the n word sometime during his career. from what Ive been shown as evidence tampering, he wasnt even around when evidence could have been messed with.

I think that most people are convinced that OJ did it but the dirfference is that many people , black and white (including me) are even more suspicious of the cops in this one. OJ got off because the system didnt value accuracy and integrity. The system had a relatively good case on OJ but someone decided to really manufacture some more evidence that just threw the really good stuff into question.

WWhat the cops didnt relize was that the same science that makes forensics work, can also detect the errors in the very forensics chain . We know that about 25% of the evidence didnt fit the timelines, wasnt properly custodied, and was even totally out of sequence(as if it were added in sometime later)

The defense team did exactly what it was supposed to do, they capitolized on the bogus and got a murderer (probable murderer) off.

Placing some system of higher accountability on the cops should go without question, however, because they are composed of the same diverse mess of people as are waiters, doctors, used car salesmen, and nuclear scientists, they can sometimes stray from the proper path.
Many states now have "OJ influence rules" that require double chains of custody on evidence, and a number of other boring but necessary requirements in rules of evidence.