timberlandko wrote:kickycan wrote:timberlandko wrote:kickycan wrote:
Good god, timber. What do you think they're gonna say? Do you actually believe they would say anything different no matter how it turned out? Come on, they always declare victory no matter what happens. They're kind of like our wonderful president that way.
Kicky, some folks realize there's a real war, irrespective of any consideration of who controls what in the US Government, a war which was thrust upon us a generation ago, some don't.
I fail to see how that relates to the article. Seems to me like you were just trying to bait the lefties.
By the way, in the article, they say they are glad the democrats won, but then they also say they want the Americans to stay in Iraq, because they haven't had enough American blood yet. If they've been listening to the "cut and run" rhetoric about the dems, why would they then be happy about the dems win?
Some folks get it, some don't, some never will. If it needs explaining, the effort likely would be wasted.
Exactly, and Timber just illustrated it perfectly.
ehBeth wrote:timberlandko wrote: a war which was thrust upon us a generation ago.
timber, can you recognize your own hooey?
Nope...nor can he and the rest who buy this crap recognize it as the same ploy used again and again by propagandists.....the old "stab in the back" myth, so blatantly created by, amongst others, the Nazis.
I note its way being prepared for again by the neocons re the current Iraq debacle......in the form of Bush's disloyal servants.
So...does this mean we have to do this all again in another 30 years re Iraq II? I can see the same miserable cycle in preparation again....