2
   

Zygote, Fetus, Clump of Cells, Alive, Dead???

 
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 08:09 pm
Abortion is 100% fatal to the unborn, if you wanna talk about damage....
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 08:15 pm
Normal, frequent or expectable temporary side effects of pregnancy:

exhaustion (weariness common from first weeks)
altered appetite and senses of taste and smell
nausea and vomiting (50% of women, first trimester)
heartburn and indigestion
constipation
weight gain
dizziness and light-headedness
bloating, swelling, fluid retention
hemmorhoids
abdominal cramps
yeast infections
congested, bloody nose
acne and mild skin disorders
skin discoloration (chloasma, face and abdomen)
mild to severe backache and strain
increased headaches
difficulty sleeping, and discomfort while sleeping
increased urination and incontinence
bleeding gums
pica
breast pain and discharge
swelling of joints, leg cramps, joint pain
difficulty sitting, standing in later pregnancy
inability to take regular medications
shortness of breath
higher blood pressure
hair loss
tendency to anemia
curtailment of ability to participate in some sports and activities
infection including from serious and potentially fatal disease
(pregnant women are immune suppressed compared with non-pregnant women, and
are more susceptible to fungal and certain other diseases)
extreme pain on delivery
hormonal mood changes, including normal post-partum depression
continued post-partum exhaustion and recovery period (exacerbated if a c-section -- major surgery -- is required, sometimes taking up to a full year to fully recover)
Normal, expectable, or frequent PERMANENT side effects of pregnancy:

stretch marks (worse in younger women)
loose skin
permanent weight gain or redistribution
abdominal and vaginal muscle weakness
pelvic floor disorder (occurring in as many as 35% of middle-aged former child-bearers and 50% of elderly former child-bearers, associated with urinary and rectal incontinence, discomfort and reduced quality of life)
changes to breasts
varicose veins
scarring from episiotomy or c-section
other permanent aesthetic changes to the body (all of these are downplayed by women, because the culture values youth and beauty)
increased proclivity for hemmorhoids
loss of dental and bone calcium (cavities and osteoporosis)
Occasional complications and side effects:

hyperemesis gravidarum
temporary and permanent injury to back
severe scarring requiring later surgery (especially after additional pregnancies)
dropped (prolapsed) uterus (especially after additional pregnancies, and other pelvic floor weaknesses -- 11% of women, including cystocele, rectocele, and enterocele)
pre-eclampsia (edema and hypertension, the most common complication of pregnancy, associated with eclampsia, and affecting 7 - 10% of pregnancies)
eclampsia (convulsions, coma during pregnancy or labor, high risk of death)
gestational diabetes
placenta previa
anemia (which can be life-threatening)
thrombocytopenic purpura
severe cramping
embolism (blood clots)
medical disability requiring full bed rest (frequently ordered during part of many pregnancies varying from days to months for health of either mother or baby)
diastasis recti, also torn abdominal muscles
mitral valve stenosis (most common cardiac complication)
serious infection and disease (e.g. increased risk of tuberculosis)
hormonal imbalance
ectopic pregnancy (risk of death)
broken bones (ribcage, "tail bone")
hemorrhage and
numerous other complications of delivery
refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease
aggravation of pre-pregnancy diseases and conditions (e.g. epilepsy is present in .5% of pregnant women, and the pregnancy alters drug metabolism and treatment prospects all the while it increases the number and frequency of seizures)
severe post-partum depression and psychosis
research now indicates a possible link between ovarian cancer and female fertility treatments, including "egg harvesting" from infertile women and donors
research also now indicates correlations between lower breast cancer survival rates and proximity in time to onset of cancer of last pregnancy
research also indicates a correlation between having six or more pregnancies and a risk of coronary and cardiovascular disease
Less common (but serious) complications:

peripartum cardiomyopathy
cardiopulmonary arrest
magnesium toxicity
severe hypoxemia/acidosis
massive embolism
increased intracranial pressure, brainstem infarction
molar pregnancy, gestational trophoblastic disease (like a pregnancy-induced cancer)
malignant arrhythmia
circulatory collapse
placental abruption
obstetric fistula
More permanent side effects:

future infertility
permanent disability
death.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 08:20 pm
real life wrote:
Abortion is 100% fatal to the unborn, if you wanna talk about damage....


..and again with your presumed equality of value.

Who will you save from the fire real life, one real child or 50 frozen embryos?
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 08:24 pm
Eorl wrote:
real life wrote:
Abortion is 100% fatal to the unborn, if you wanna talk about damage....


..and again with your presumed equality of value.

Who will you save from the fire real life, one real child or 50 frozen embryos?


A paradox!
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 08:25 pm
Eorl wrote:
Normal, frequent or expectable temporary side effects of pregnancy:

exhaustion (weariness common from first weeks)
altered appetite and senses of taste and smell
nausea and vomiting (50% of women, first trimester)
heartburn and indigestion
constipation
weight gain
dizziness and light-headedness
bloating, swelling, fluid retention
hemmorhoids
abdominal cramps
yeast infections
congested, bloody nose
acne and mild skin disorders
skin discoloration (chloasma, face and abdomen)
mild to severe backache and strain
increased headaches
difficulty sleeping, and discomfort while sleeping
increased urination and incontinence
bleeding gums
pica
breast pain and discharge
swelling of joints, leg cramps, joint pain
difficulty sitting, standing in later pregnancy
inability to take regular medications
shortness of breath
higher blood pressure
hair loss
tendency to anemia
curtailment of ability to participate in some sports and activities
infection including from serious and potentially fatal disease
(pregnant women are immune suppressed compared with non-pregnant women, and
are more susceptible to fungal and certain other diseases)
extreme pain on delivery
hormonal mood changes, including normal post-partum depression
continued post-partum exhaustion and recovery period (exacerbated if a c-section -- major surgery -- is required, sometimes taking up to a full year to fully recover)
Normal, expectable, or frequent PERMANENT side effects of pregnancy:

stretch marks (worse in younger women)
loose skin
permanent weight gain or redistribution
abdominal and vaginal muscle weakness
pelvic floor disorder (occurring in as many as 35% of middle-aged former child-bearers and 50% of elderly former child-bearers, associated with urinary and rectal incontinence, discomfort and reduced quality of life)
changes to breasts
varicose veins
scarring from episiotomy or c-section
other permanent aesthetic changes to the body (all of these are downplayed by women, because the culture values youth and beauty)
increased proclivity for hemmorhoids
loss of dental and bone calcium (cavities and osteoporosis)
Occasional complications and side effects:

hyperemesis gravidarum
temporary and permanent injury to back
severe scarring requiring later surgery (especially after additional pregnancies)
dropped (prolapsed) uterus (especially after additional pregnancies, and other pelvic floor weaknesses -- 11% of women, including cystocele, rectocele, and enterocele)
pre-eclampsia (edema and hypertension, the most common complication of pregnancy, associated with eclampsia, and affecting 7 - 10% of pregnancies)
eclampsia (convulsions, coma during pregnancy or labor, high risk of death)
gestational diabetes
placenta previa
anemia (which can be life-threatening)
thrombocytopenic purpura
severe cramping
embolism (blood clots)
medical disability requiring full bed rest (frequently ordered during part of many pregnancies varying from days to months for health of either mother or baby)
diastasis recti, also torn abdominal muscles
mitral valve stenosis (most common cardiac complication)
serious infection and disease (e.g. increased risk of tuberculosis)
hormonal imbalance
ectopic pregnancy (risk of death)
broken bones (ribcage, "tail bone")
hemorrhage and
numerous other complications of delivery
refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease
aggravation of pre-pregnancy diseases and conditions (e.g. epilepsy is present in .5% of pregnant women, and the pregnancy alters drug metabolism and treatment prospects all the while it increases the number and frequency of seizures)
severe post-partum depression and psychosis
research now indicates a possible link between ovarian cancer and female fertility treatments, including "egg harvesting" from infertile women and donors
research also now indicates correlations between lower breast cancer survival rates and proximity in time to onset of cancer of last pregnancy
research also indicates a correlation between having six or more pregnancies and a risk of coronary and cardiovascular disease
Less common (but serious) complications:

peripartum cardiomyopathy
cardiopulmonary arrest
magnesium toxicity
severe hypoxemia/acidosis
massive embolism
increased intracranial pressure, brainstem infarction
molar pregnancy, gestational trophoblastic disease (like a pregnancy-induced cancer)
malignant arrhythmia
circulatory collapse
placental abruption
obstetric fistula
More permanent side effects:

future infertility
permanent disability
death.



Normal, frequent or expectable permanent effect of abortion: DEATH

----------------------------------------------------------

Are you still trying to establish that the unborn is a 'parasite' ?

Is the unborn not of the same species as the mother?
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 08:31 pm
Catch up, real life. The definition I posted clearly defined paratism as between two species so as to deliberately EXCLUDE the mammalian foetus BECAUSE it is so similar a relationship.

Then someone claimed no damage occurs to the mother. Thus the list.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 08:38 pm
Which would you choose for yourself -- the damage the woman may or may not[/i] suffer during pregnancy; or the 100% certain damage, DEATH, that the unborn will ALWAYS suffer in a successful abortion?
0 Replies
 
Stray Cat
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 08:46 pm
Calm down, Eorl. I never said there weren't side effects to pregnancy. But it isn't the same thing as a foreign parasite invading the body of another organism, which may bring infectious agents along with it and will drain the host for most of it's life. A parasite is also capable of moving on to another host if necessary.

In addition, many parasites, such as a tapeworm, can exist outside the body of the host -- without assistance. None of that is true for a human embryo or fetus.

But I can't help wondering why it is so important to you to classify the embryo or fetus as a "parasite." Just an attempt to devalue its significance?

I noticed it's the only point in my post that you've touched on.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 09:44 pm
Stray Cat wrote:
Calm down, Eorl. I never said there weren't side effects to pregnancy. But it isn't the same thing as a foreign parasite invading the body of another organism, which may bring infectious agents along with it and will drain the host for most of it's life. A parasite is also capable of moving on to another host if necessary.

In addition, many parasites, such as a tapeworm, can exist outside the body of the host -- without assistance. None of that is true for a human embryo or fetus.

But I can't help wondering why it is so important to you to classify the embryo or fetus as a "parasite." Just an attempt to devalue its significance?

I noticed it's the only point in my post that you've touched on.


Hey, I'm calm.

I rarely try to rebuff an entire post and deal with everything every poster says. Posts get enormous, and I do have to do some work, ya know. :wink:

On this point, I thought you were clearly wrong. Pregnancy is not the same thing as parasitism, but it is so close that definitions need to be written to deliberatley exclude it, because in almost every way, it is a parasitic relationship.

When you said no damage occurs to mother, I didn't have to look very far (my wife is 7 months with our second) to know how wrong you are.

I am not really commited to representing the foetus as a parasite, I just don't like seeing what I see as the obvious reality of the situation being misrepresented.

Maternal mortality is so high in the developing world (1 in 48) that it is customary for Tanzanian women about to give birth to bid farewell to their older children.
Michele Landsberg, 30 Sept 2000

Let me ask you Stray Cat, if a hospital was on fire and you could save a small fridge containing 50 frozen embryos or one 5 year old child...which would you choose?
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 09:47 pm
real life wrote:
Which would you choose for yourself -- the damage the woman may or may not[/i] suffer during pregnancy; or the 100% certain damage, DEATH, that the unborn will ALWAYS suffer in a successful abortion?


I'll answer yours when you answer mine. 50 embryos or a child? (For therein lies the answer to your question.)
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 11:28 pm
Eorl wrote:
real life wrote:
Which would you choose for yourself -- the damage the woman may or may not[/i] suffer during pregnancy; or the 100% certain damage, DEATH, that the unborn will ALWAYS suffer in a successful abortion?


I'll answer yours when you answer mine. 50 embryos or a child? (For therein lies the answer to your question.)


you'd be a fool to expect that RL will just simply answer your question. He'll attack your question before answering it.

Don't hold your breathe, this waltz is all too familiar.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 11:34 pm
Yep. For someone with all the answers, he seems very determined not to share them with anybody else.
0 Replies
 
Stray Cat
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Nov, 2006 11:48 pm
Quote:
Hey, I'm calm.

I rarely try to rebuff an entire post and deal with everything every poster says. Posts get enormous, and I do have to do some work, ya know.

On this point, I thought you were clearly wrong. Pregnancy is not the same thing as parasitism, but it is so close that definitions need to be written to deliberatley exclude it, because in almost every way, it is a parasitic relationship.


Ok, Eorl. No problemo!

Quote:
Let me ask you Stray Cat, if a hospital was on fire and you could save a small fridge containing 50 frozen embryos or one 5 year old child...which would you choose?


I'd pick the 5 year old child, no question. I'll even go you one better, Eorl. There are some situations in which I believe an abortion is justified. For instance, if there is a pre-existing condition which suggests that the mother would have a cerebral hemorrage during child birth. I don't think the mother should be expected to give up her life to give birth.

There is also another condition (sorry, I can't think of the medical term at the moment) in which the baby is born, only lives for about two or three months, and is constant pain the entire time. This condition (whose name escapes me) can be pre-determined by an amniocentesis. In that case, I think an abortion is also justified.

I was just trying to point out that, in the situations that Terry presented, there are other options besides abortion.

Well, speaking of work, I have to go back to work tomorrow. So I'm turning in now. Congratulations to you and your wife! :wink:
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Nov, 2006 12:05 am
Stray Cat wrote:

I'd pick the 5 year old child, no question. I'll even go you one better, Eorl. There are some situations in which I believe an abortion is justified. ....... Congratulations to you and your wife! :wink:


Thanks, Stray Cat!

I'd pick the 5 year old also.

Couple of questions...

Who do you think should be decide which situations are justifiable? You? Doctors? Scientists? Ethicists? Politicians?

If a 14 year old girl fell pregnant to her father, and knew that her father would kill her if anyone found out....what options would you like available to her?

Should she have to prove paternity and thereby get her father arrested? Should she try to abort the foetus herself? Should she run away and try her luck on the streets?

What if she's 24 and in total fear of her violent husband?

What if she nearly died in a previous pregnancy, and is determined not to risk it, even though the doctors tell her she should be OK?

What if she's 48 and knows that she has better than 1-50 chance of having to care for a child with Downs syndrome...would you prefer she find her own method of abortion also? Would you lock her up to ensure she does nothing? If she does, is she guilty of murder?

Basically, what makes you think you have the right to declare (let alone decide) who is entitled to an abortion and who isn't?

(As I like to point out, I'm not in favour of abortion (few people are)..... but I will fight tooth and nail to make it safe and available to all)
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Nov, 2006 12:15 am
Diest TKO wrote:
Eorl wrote:
real life wrote:
Which would you choose for yourself -- the damage the woman may or may not[/i] suffer during pregnancy; or the 100% certain damage, DEATH, that the unborn will ALWAYS suffer in a successful abortion?


I'll answer yours when you answer mine. 50 embryos or a child? (For therein lies the answer to your question.)


you'd be a fool to expect that RL will just simply answer your question. He'll attack your question before answering it.

Don't hold your breathe, this waltz is all too familiar.


Well, Diest if you look back a few days you'll see how we've discussed why the conjured up 'lifeboat scenarios' which have no real relationship to the actual circumstances of the abortion question, seem to be the only questions Eorl shows great interest in.

When asked when is one a living human being, the 'definition' he gives 'proves' that one must be able to build a fire, and produce literature and music before one qualifies.

As I mentioned, I could've taken the easy way out and mentioned that the freezer will likely protect the embryos from the fire. So if you're gonna try your hand at you seem to think is a 'paradox' , you might as least try one with some actual difficulty.

I haven't heard much from you since I blew apart your argument regarding Missouri's Amendment 2. How have you been?

Is your local university going to cash in on A2 and get in on the millions now available in Missouri's cloning biz?
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Nov, 2006 12:22 am
Dodge the question again, real life?

How many fridges do you know maintain their temperatures while the building burns around them?

I am indeed fond of this question because it proves the greater value of life one attaches to a five year old than one does to an embryo. In crude terms, the 5 year old is worth more. Far more.

You would save the 5-year-old, even if it meant the end of the foetuses. You know it.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Nov, 2006 12:25 am
Eorl wrote:
Stray Cat wrote:

I'd pick the 5 year old child, no question. I'll even go you one better, Eorl. There are some situations in which I believe an abortion is justified. ....... Congratulations to you and your wife! :wink:


Thanks, Stray Cat!

I'd pick the 5 year old also.

Couple of questions...

Who do you think should be decide which situations are justifiable? You? Doctors? Scientists? Ethicists? Politicians?

If a 14 year old girl fell pregnant to her father, and knew that her father would kill her if anyone found out....what options would you like available to her?

Should she have to prove paternity and thereby get her father arrested? Should she try to abort the foetus herself? Should she run away and try her luck on the streets?

What if she's 24 and in total fear of her violent husband?

What if she nearly died in a previous pregnancy, and is determined not to risk it, even though the doctors tell her she should be OK?

What if she's 48 and knows that she has better than 1-50 chance of having to care for a child with Downs syndrome...would you prefer she find her own method of abortion also? Would you lock her up to ensure she does nothing? If she does, is she guilty of murder?

Basically, what makes you think you have the right to declare (let alone decide) who is entitled to an abortion and who isn't?

(As I like to point out, I'm not in favour of abortion (few people are)..... but I will fight tooth and nail to make it safe and available to all)


Honestly Eorl.

Why does your position embarrass you so?

Why do pro-aborts always offer left handed apologies 'well I'm not really in favor of abortion , nobody is blah blah' ......................if there is absolutely nothing wrong with it?

If an abortion has no more moral consequence than removing a wart or a mole, why the dissembling? Why the pussyfooting?

Why don't you say 'I'm a proud advocate of abortion and I think it's a fantastic solution to a host of problems. I proudly recommend it without reservation.'

What's there to be embarrassed or half hearted about if abortion is simply the removal of a bit of unwanted flesh?

If there is no human life at stake, what's for you to be so timid and apologetic about?

Would you be proud to be in the abortion business yourself?

Would you stand behind your product, go on TV and advertise 'I'm an abortionist, and proud of it. I'm in business to offer a wonderful service that I'm so excited about. I'm thankful every day to be in this business.'
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Nov, 2006 12:27 am
Dodge the question again, real life?

How many fridges do you know maintain their temperatures while the building burns around them?

I am indeed fond of this question because it proves the greater value of life one attaches to a five year old than one does to an embryo. In crude terms, the 5 year old is worth more. Far more.

You would save the 5-year-old, even if it meant the end of the foetuses. You know it.

(As for the previous post, you know my position better than anyone. I can't believe you don't understand it. That means it's simply an attempt at pure slur, which I'll try to ignore.)
0 Replies
 
Stray Cat
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Nov, 2006 12:35 am
ok, I'll give these a shot.....

Quote:
Who do you think should be decide which situations are justifiable? You? Doctors? Scientists? Ethicists? Politicians?


I never said I should be the "one" to decide. I wouldn't leave it up to politicians either. How about a combination of doctors and ethicists?

How about you, Eorl? Who do you think should decide? Do you think this is a question that shoud be left up to the individual, and everyone else should just mind their own business? Should the unborn child not have anyone to present its case?

Quote:
If a 14 year old girl fell pregnant to her father, and knew that her father would kill her if anyone found out....what options would you like available to her?


Is their no mother in this situation or any other relatives or guidance counselors at school -- no one else to whom she can turn to for help? She's simply in a vacuum with the father?

Quote:
Should she have to prove paternity and thereby get her father arrested?


Yes, I think she should do everything possible to have her father arrested if he is threatening to kill her. If he is molesting her, isn't is possible he's threatening to kill her if she tells anyone (even if she's not pregnant)? Should she sit back and take it?

Quote:
What if she's 24 and in total fear of her violent husband?


See above. No one should be living in fear of a violent husband. She needs to get out -- long before she gets pregnant.

Quote:
What if she nearly died in a previous pregnancy, and is determined not to risk it, even though the doctors tell her she should be OK?


This doesn't make much sense to me. If she nearly died in a previous pregnancy and doesn't want to risk it, why wouldn't she have had a tubal ligation?

[/QUOTE]What if she's 48 and knows that she has better than 1-50 chance of having to care for a child with Downs syndrome...would you prefer she find her own method of abortion also? Would you lock her up to ensure she does nothing? If she does, is she guilty of murder?
Quote:


How about adoption? There are people who are more than willing to adopt a special needs child.

Basically, what makes you think you have the right to declare (let alone decide) who is entitled to an abortion and who isn't?
Quote:


Never said I had the right to decide that. I just offered my opinion. No law against that, is there?

Ok, that's the best I can do at one-thirty in the morning. I'll leave the rest of you to thrash this out.

Thanks for the interesting conversation, though.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Nov, 2006 12:36 am
Eorl wrote:

(As for the previous post, you know my position better than anyone. I can't believe you don't understand it. That means it's simply an attempt at pure slur, which I'll try to ignore.)


Not a slur at all. It's a real question.

Why hemhaw about your position 'well I'm not really IN FAVOR of abortion.....'

Well, why not?

If there's nothing wrong with it, you should be in favor of it.

If there's no human life at stake , then why the moral confusion?

If it was just a wart, a blob of tissue, not a living human being then I'd be in favor of removing it.

Why wouldn't you?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 02:20:29