When Does Life Begin?

Outline it if you think it's so transparent.

. . . If one terminates an otherwise viable human life, you may call it whatever you wish . . .

cicerone imposter wrote:

neo, This thread is about "abortion." I have no influence on what any woman decides to do with her fetus whether to go full term or to terminate it. It's between her and her doctor, and it's none of my business.

If she commits murder, it's up to the authorities to charge her with murder. I'm completely out of the loop.

If it's none of your business, why are you talking about it?

And if it's none of your business , why are you telling others how they should approach the issue?

Why don't you practice what you are preaching, CI?

Diest TKO wrote:

Outline it if you think it's so transparent.

neologist wrote:

. . . If one terminates an otherwise viable human life, you may call it whatever you wish . . .

real life wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

neo, This thread is about "abortion." I have no influence on what any woman decides to do with her fetus whether to go full term or to terminate it. It's between her and her doctor, and it's none of my business.

If she commits murder, it's up to the authorities to charge her with murder. I'm completely out of the loop.

If it's none of your business, why are you talking about it?

And if it's none of your business , why are you telling others how they should approach the issue?

Why don't you practice what you are preaching, CI?

Because I like to expose hypocrites. It's one of the few enjoyments I have on a2k.

real life wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

neo, This thread is about "abortion." I have no influence on what any woman decides to do with her fetus whether to go full term or to terminate it. It's between her and her doctor, and it's none of my business.

If she commits murder, it's up to the authorities to charge her with murder. I'm completely out of the loop.

If it's none of your business, why are you talking about it?

And if it's none of your business , why are you telling others how they should approach the issue?

Why don't you practice what you are preaching, CI?

Because I like to expose hypocrites. It's one of the few enjoyments I have on a2k.

neologist wrote:

Diest TKO wrote:

Outline it if you think it's so transparent.

neologist wrote:

. . . If one terminates an otherwise viable human life, you may call it whatever you wish . . .

If this is your problem, then people trying very hard to create life via IVT are the worst!

T
K
O

cicerone imposter wrote:

real life wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

neo, This thread is about "abortion." I have no influence on what any woman decides to do with her fetus whether to go full term or to terminate it. It's between her and her doctor, and it's none of my business.

If she commits murder, it's up to the authorities to charge her with murder. I'm completely out of the loop.

If it's none of your business, why are you talking about it?

And if it's none of your business , why are you telling others how they should approach the issue?

Why don't you practice what you are preaching, CI?

Because I like to expose hypocrites. It's one of the few enjoyments I have on a2k.

You've done a very good job of it, I must say.

A hypocrite is one who doesn't act in accordance with their beliefs.

I believe that abortion should be opposed, and I do so.

You have stated repeatedly that you do not attempt to impose your view of right and wrong on anybody but yourself.

Yet you continual scold people for not holding your view of right and wrong.

Yes, you've done a very good job.

real life wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

real life wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

neo, This thread is about "abortion." I have no influence on what any woman decides to do with her fetus whether to go full term or to terminate it. It's between her and her doctor, and it's none of my business.

If she commits murder, it's up to the authorities to charge her with murder. I'm completely out of the loop.

If it's none of your business, why are you talking about it?

And if it's none of your business , why are you telling others how they should approach the issue?

Why don't you practice what you are preaching, CI?

Because I like to expose hypocrites. It's one of the few enjoyments I have on a2k.

You've done a very good job of it, I must say.

A hypocrite is one who doesn't act in accordance with their beliefs.

I believe that abortion should be opposed, and I do so.

You have stated repeatedly that you do not attempt to impose your view of right and wrong on anybody but yourself.

Yet you continual scold people for not holding your view of right and wrong.

Yes, you've done a very good job.

No, real, it's something that escapes you and your fellow hypocrites. You continue to claim that the fetus must be protected from murder, but you haven't done much for those children already alive who are without shelter and food. You are the hypocrite - first class - who tries to impose your personal belief about life on women you don't even know or care about. Unless you are willing to care for all the babies now alive, you have no business trying impose your foolish belief about what constitutes life.

I don't have to know you to know a zealot. You reveal yourselves by your words.

cicerone imposter wrote:

real life wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

real life wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

neo, This thread is about "abortion." I have no influence on what any woman decides to do with her fetus whether to go full term or to terminate it. It's between her and her doctor, and it's none of my business.

If she commits murder, it's up to the authorities to charge her with murder. I'm completely out of the loop.

If it's none of your business, why are you talking about it?

And if it's none of your business , why are you telling others how they should approach the issue?

Why don't you practice what you are preaching, CI?

Because I like to expose hypocrites. It's one of the few enjoyments I have on a2k.

You've done a very good job of it, I must say.

A hypocrite is one who doesn't act in accordance with their beliefs.

I believe that abortion should be opposed, and I do so.

You have stated repeatedly that you do not attempt to impose your view of right and wrong on anybody but yourself.

Yet you continual scold people for not holding your view of right and wrong.

Yes, you've done a very good job.

No, real, it's something that escapes you and your fellow hypocrites. You continue to claim that the fetus must be protected from murder, but you haven't done much for those children already alive who are without shelter and food. You are the hypocrite - first class - who tries to impose your personal belief about life on women you don't even know or care about. Unless you are willing to care for all the babies now alive, you have no business trying impose your foolish belief about what constitutes life.

In order for RL to speak out about his beliefs as to what constitutes life...he would have to care for all babies that are alive now?

Do you mean take care of?

Why?

By your standard....Do you have any business to speak about what constitutes life?

How do you know what RL has done for other children or the homeless?

Who can speak out under that standard????Then listen to him.

So I take it that (by your own words) you will be practicing what you preach "unlike RL" and keep your comments about what you believe does and does not constitute life....to yourself... or reveal yourself for being....what you accuse us of being?

Please point out to me where my hypocrisy lies; I do not wish to impose my beliefs - religious or otherwise - on what constitutes life on women I don't even know or care about. I believe it's the woman's choice with her doctor; it's none of my business. If a crime is committed, it's up to the legal system to respond. You people like to call it "murder."

Show me?

The hypocrisy of a moral relativist lecturing others on what they should believe, say and do is too funny.

Fortunately, most of them fail to see it, which adds to the fun.

Also, their failure to discern the inconsistency in their position is indicative of why they are a moral relativist in the first place.