real life wrote:
Chumly wrote:Sure, or any type of human cloning or artificial growth promotion methodologies such as fertility drugs.
It also would seem anything that artificially interferes with the "natural god given" promotion of human reproduction / growth such as condoms or antibiotics would also be suspect.
Condoms are not an issue in the abortion debate.
Certainly not, but it's still relavant. The discussion is described as: "when does life begin," which has an answer. the answer however is a part of the larger topics of the moral, ethical, and legal issues of reproductive rights/legislation.
Birth control certainly falls into this active dialogue.
real life wrote:
Prevention of fertilization doesn't kill a fertilized egg, does it?
Sure doesn't. Tell the Pope. For that matter tell as many people as you can. Tell them to wear condoms; get on a form of birth control, etc. A better education on this topic would resolve so much on both ends of this debate.
real life wrote:
The abortion issue is 'who has a right to end an innocent human life?'
By current political trends, if you wish to take innocent lives, you need to be the President.
But specifically in this arena, it's between the state/federal and the mother/couple. I side with the mother/couple as I see no need for the government to make that choice; the social climate does not require government intrusion.
real life wrote:
Read your biology textbook from the 7th grade.
Chumly, he's actually asking you to read HIS biology book from the 7th grade: The Bible. You can skip over the part where man is made from dust and woman from his rib though.
real life wrote:
Eggs and sperm do not have the correct amount of chromosomes to be living human beings.
And a embryo doesn't have the ability to feed or breathe without a HOST, nor can it think. The issue is not resolved here. BTW, orphans do however have these abilities, and your desired number of chromozones, go preach to them about to them about the innocent without voices.
real life wrote:
But, please, do keep bringing up this ridiculous objection, as you have frequently done in the past.
Please continue to parade your non-answers as fact when in truth you have not the courage to have your ideas challenged.
real life wrote:
The more foolish your objections, the more that others will see thru the flimsy arguments used by pro-abortion folks like yourself.
The truth hurts
Keep singing that song
One trick pony