TKO wrote-
Quote:You brought up hypnotizing and when you were called on it you then referred to it as if you had not been the one who suggested it.
When?
I brought up hypnotizing. Twice, When was I called on it. When did I refer to it as if I had not suggested it. I had every intention of suggesting it. Why would I do what you said? Nobody else suggested it as far as I know. I can't imagine what you are talking about.
I know what-
"Bow down to her on Sunday
Salute her when her birthday comes
Bow down to her on Sunday
Salute her when her birthday comes
For Halloween buy her a trumpet
And for Christmas buy her a drum.
She wears an Egyptian ring
It sparkles before she speaks
She wears an Egyptian ring
It sparkles before she speaks
She's a hypnotist collector
You are a walking antique."
means.
Do you?
Not a chance.You just like piss-balling about with other people's lives.
Quote:I don't need anyone else's argument, and I'm not here to defend anyone's beliefs but my own. I think this is pretty funny when contrasted against your belief that when women are given free choice they just ruin their lives. You are a biggot of the first order.
You have no other way of proceeding than to derive your position from someone else. It's inescapable if you live in a culture. You might choose who's arguments to fit your purposes, such as self justification, but you get them from somewhere. Some turn you took way back. How can you have your own beliefs. You wouldn't even have language without someone else.
How does facing up to reality constitute being a bigot? Have you never seen women organising a bring-and-buy sale at the vicarage?
Quote:You have yet to do anything that you have said above. Adn yes you are running. To not run would be to admit that your suggestion of hynotism was poor and would ultimately violate a woman.
I admit no such thing. I'm not running. That's an idea in your own head. A convenient one I know but still it's one that resides inside your own conk and nowhere else. I brought in hypnotism brazenly. It wasn't a typo.
What have I said above that I haven't done. There's loads of things I haven't done. An infinite number actually minus the things I have done. Which is still infinite I gather. If you subtract any number you can think up from infinity the answer is infinity. That's sums not maths.
Quote:We aren't talking about every woman?
I'm certainly relieved about that. Some of the women I have read about who had real choice were a bit of a handful. Take Poppea Sabina for instance. Are you talking about women who have no choice pretending they have choice or women who have untrammeled choice?
Quote:Do you know what the word "all" means?
I certainly do. I have my doubts that you do though.
Quote:A choice for "some" eh? So you then are retracting your statement that homosexuality is a fertility strike, I assume. If it's only a choice for some then it can't be considered a strike for those who are homosexuals by choice. Nice use of the word "some." Especcially following such a definitive and broad statement that homosexuality is a fertility strike.
Did I mention T.S. Eliot and the Marqise de Sade earlier in that regard. I try not to repeat myself. I don't wish to bore my readers with repetition.
Quote:You're getting despirate now and it's even more pathetic. Women should have all of the above. As for your idea that the world would then turn on christianity and go to a communist dictatorship, I'd like to see you prove it. First, Christian women would be able to choose not to have sex, they would be able to choose to dress as christians do, and they could continue to choose to give birth anytime they are pregnant. Christianity would continue. Second, anarchy and communism would hardly be a product. Taking away power from one gender however could create disorder, you claim is unsupported, and a poor attempt to ingender fear in the minds of conservative christians.
If this is "despirate" it isn't all that bad. I was talking about women who want to have sex all up and down the block whenever they feel like it. What do Christian women have to do with that. You don't want to hear what Christian women think about where you are coming from.
Do you?
The ones who come in the pub on gig nights look as if they can hardly wait to doff-off. They love displaying their charms. You can see their eyes all gleaming when men are fighting over them. They are sound Darwinians you see.
Quote:It hasn't happened, ever. You examples are not of when ALL women had a fertility strike. They are just a diversion to the fact that you acknowledge how poor your own argument is.
It has happened. You won't have heard of it because it died out. Selected out they say. Obviously. When it got serious it was stopped by sound management assuming you don't care for cave dwelling and associated conveniences.
What on earth is a "diversion to the fact" supposed to mean in relation to me acknowledging how poor my argument is which I don't for a moment.
Quote:I don't support the idea of the draft.
How very nice.
When did I mention these circumstances? They were drafted to see Hitler off. I've known plenty of them. They had little choice. And they were risking being blown to bits. I daresay a few of them might have swapped for being pregnant.
