1
   

Jesus In Heaven Don't We Have Enough On Our Plates?

 
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 10:59 pm
Heh, I've quit arguing, as I don't really have arguments re you or nimh. (have yet to review his points, but probably not). I do have - probably - fluorescent arguments against whatever the hell the US may be apt to do, let's wait and see.

My wail has been primarily against the US apparent sense of entitlement. (and, oh, by the way, I don't hate my country).
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 11:06 pm
Yes, I know. I ain't arguing either, I realized that you seem to be advocating against something else than we are advocating for... just wasn't sure what exactly, that's all. As for imposing one country's will upon another country - that is never a good idea, anywhere.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 11:30 pm
Our government was worried that a successful communist nation in our hemisphere would infect the rest of Latin America's oppressive societies. Our solultion was to guarantee the failure of Castro's political system. Our economic embargo eventually did that. No doubt, Castro is a nut case, but who knows what Cuba would be like today had we kept away. Russia would not have had such an entre--through their economic support--if we had been more supportive, or at least not obstructive--i.e., permitting Cuba to trade with other societies to a greater extent.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 04:07 am
JLNobody wrote:
Our government was worried that a successful communist nation in our hemisphere would infect the rest of Latin America's oppressive societies. Our solultion was to guarantee the failure of Castro's political system. Our economic embargo eventually did that. No doubt, Castro is a nut case, but who knows what Cuba would be like today had we kept away. Russia would not have had such an entre--through their economic support--if we had been more supportive, or at least not obstructive--i.e., permitting Cuba to trade with other societies to a greater extent.


Amen!
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 04:56 am
I believe the USA's policies have helped Castro stay in power, and may have been a factor in the amount of repression used to quell dissension there. I think it would do more good to allow free trade with Cuba over the long run than what we have been doing since the 60s.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 07:22 am
Frank Apisa wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Are you of the opinion that assisting Cuba to transition to a democracy would be a bad thing?

Or do you just want to bitch about Bush?


I'm saying no ones asked for our help and that the presumptious bastard ought to wait until somebody does....

bush reminds me of the idiots who come up to me and tell me how to run sound when they don't know a fader from a volume knob.....a damned annoyance and a lot of balls....

I'm sure that many of the poor, downtrodden Cubans, in their fascist dictatorship, would ask for help if they could.


Learn the difference between fascism and communism before posting this horseshyt, Brandon.

This is a goddam laugh!

I believe you're mistaken. Here's how the American Heritage Dictionary defines fascism:

Quote:
1. often Fascism a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government. 2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.


Clearly Cuba fits this definition. Please show me where I'm wrong.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 09:25 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Are you of the opinion that assisting Cuba to transition to a democracy would be a bad thing?

Or do you just want to bitch about Bush?


I'm saying no ones asked for our help and that the presumptious bastard ought to wait until somebody does....

bush reminds me of the idiots who come up to me and tell me how to run sound when they don't know a fader from a volume knob.....a damned annoyance and a lot of balls....

I'm sure that many of the poor, downtrodden Cubans, in their fascist dictatorship, would ask for help if they could.


Learn the difference between fascism and communism before posting this horseshyt, Brandon.

This is a goddam laugh!

I believe you're mistaken. Here's how the American Heritage Dictionary defines fascism:

Quote:
1. often Fascism a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government. 2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.


Clearly Cuba fits this definition. Please show me where I'm wrong.


You really are not an especially bright person, are you, Brandon.

Even some stupid people realize that while both fascism and communism often are present in totalitarian states...they are, by nature, almost polar.

If you had said, "I'm sure that many of the poor, downtrodden Cubans, in their communist
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 09:44 am
It's interesting that you have never defended the US when it's referred to as being fascist, yet jump all over Brandon for defining Cuba as such.

Do you believe that America is a fascist or becoming a fascist country Frank?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 09:54 am
ossobuco wrote:
I assume they will evolve, if that is the right word, to a changed economic way of thinking and of self expression.



Things are already evolving, without outside 'help'. Have been for some years. Education system's beyond decent, medical system's very good, media is not what most Americans (or people whose access is through the U.S.) think. A former roommate of mine moved to Cuba from Canada about 10 years ago, after a number of visits arranged through Gautemalan and El Salvadorean connections. She works in TV and radio there now. She's got an unusual perspective on things, coming from 'the West', and choosing a life and career in Cuba. Not grandly free, but not what Miami Cubans suggest.

It's not the 1950's in Cuba anymore - even if it is in Miami.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 09:56 am
McGentrix wrote:
It's interesting that you have never defended the US when it's referred to as being fascist, yet jump all over Brandon for defining Cuba as such.

Do you believe that America is a fascist or becoming a fascist country Frank?


You should know by now, McG...that I do not do "believing" at all.

If you are asking me for an opinion, however...

...I am of the opinion that the ascendency of American conservatism has wounded America in ways that simply may not be repairable.

I think those of us who truly love this country...and who love and treasure the freedoms that have been handed down to us...are in much, much, much greater danger from the lunatic right fringe (read that American conservatism) than from other elements of danger such as Islamic fundamentalism.

I don't think we are becoming a fascistic country, McG...although I think that if the political pendulum and momentum does not swing back in the other direction sometime during the next decade or two...

...we could come to the point where it might happen.

My guess is that every dominant society ever to exist on this planet has supposed it was destined to stay dominant.

All have fallen.

More than likely, we too will one day fall from our pedestal.

You conservatives...and your Christian co-conspirators...seem anxious to give us a push in that direction.

I loathe American conservatism because of that.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 10:09 am
kelticwizard wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
[ We have more than a million political refugees from Castro's Cuba living in the US. Cuba is just a few miles from our shores. The US has a legitimate interest in Cuba being a free and democratic country. If we want to offer assistance to Cuba and Cubans, damn straight it's our business.


Your avatar gives you away, Tico.

You don't give a damn about any of that stuff.

You just want the chance to get a good cigar.


That would certainly be a side benefit. http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/9800/banditbu4.gif



Oh, and agreeing with Nimh's and Dag's comments on this topic.
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 10:38 am
ehBeth wrote:
ossobuco wrote:
I assume they will evolve, if that is the right word, to a changed economic way of thinking and of self expression.



Things are already evolving, without outside 'help'. Have been for some years. Education system's beyond decent, medical system's very good, media is not what most Americans (or people whose access is through the U.S.) think. A former roommate of mine moved to Cuba from Canada about 10 years ago, after a number of visits arranged through Gautemalan and El Salvadorean connections. She works in TV and radio there now. She's got an unusual perspective on things, coming from 'the West', and choosing a life and career in Cuba. Not grandly free, but not what Miami Cubans suggest.

It's not the 1950's in Cuba anymore - even if it is in Miami.


Reporters Without Borders disagrees:

Quote:
Cuba - Annual report 2006

Press freedom worsened in 2005 with a new crackdown on dissidents during the summer that included three journalists, who joined 20 others imprisoned since the wave of arrests in March 2003.

Cuba is still the world's second biggest prison for journalists. Seven were freed in 2004 and two in 2005, but the past year saw the arrest of Oscar Mario González Pérez, of the independent news agency Grupo de Trabajo Decoro, in Havana on 22 July. He was charged under law 88 on protection of "the Cuban economy and national independence" but was not tried. A few days earlier, Roberto de Jesús Guerra Pérez, who worked for the websites Payolibre and Nueva Prensa Cubana as well as Radio Martí, was jailed for "disturbing the peace."
Albert Santiago Du Bouchet Fernández, of the Havana Press news agency, was sentenced to a year in prison on 9 August for "civil disobedience" and "resisting arrest." The same day, Lamasiel Gutiérrez Romero, of Nueva Prensa Cubana, was given a seven-month suspended jail sentence. He was imprisoned on 11 October when he resumed working.

The mental and physical health of many of the 20 journalists jailed since the March 2003 crackdown seriously declined in 2005. They were being held in poor conditions and most were very demoralised. Poet and journalist Raúl Rivero, freed in November 2004, wrote an article in the Spanish daily El País supporting them. Victor Rolando Arroyo Carmona staged a 25-day hunger strike, showing the increasing desperation of the imprisoned journalists.
Independent journalists in Cuba are constantly hounded by the regime, by beatings, eviction from their homes and frequent summonses by the police when for several hours they are insulted and threatened with imprisonment.

http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=17421
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 10:52 am
SierraSong wrote:
Reporters Without Borders disagrees:


Good on 'em.

I disagree with what I read in their commentary on Guatemala, Argentina and Nicaragua. Can't find anything there on El Salvador - and given their position paper, there should be. Their coverage on Canada and the U.S. is weak, IMNSHO, to be polite.

They may be more right about Cuba than the woman I'm in touch with. They may be more right about the other countries as well.

We all have to develop our own opinions through information we can gather from a variety of sources.

One of my opinions remains that the U.S. needs to take care of its own house first. As do all other countries, including Canada, Great Britain, Germany ...
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 11:09 am
ehBeth wrote:
SierraSong wrote:
Reporters Without Borders disagrees:


They may be more right about Cuba than the woman I'm in touch with. They may be more right about the other countries as well.


Highly likely since she's living in a country with no freedom of the press. Doubtful she'd be able to pick up a newspaper or turn on a radio or TV and learn the truth.
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 11:15 am
I would like a nice, legal Havana cigar. I think that alone is worth destroying the country and causing devastation in our usual way.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 11:19 am
Frank Apisa wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Are you of the opinion that assisting Cuba to transition to a democracy would be a bad thing?

Or do you just want to bitch about Bush?


I'm saying no ones asked for our help and that the presumptious bastard ought to wait until somebody does....

bush reminds me of the idiots who come up to me and tell me how to run sound when they don't know a fader from a volume knob.....a damned annoyance and a lot of balls....

I'm sure that many of the poor, downtrodden Cubans, in their fascist dictatorship, would ask for help if they could.


Learn the difference between fascism and communism before posting this horseshyt, Brandon.

This is a goddam laugh!

I believe you're mistaken. Here's how the American Heritage Dictionary defines fascism:

Quote:
1. often Fascism a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government. 2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.


Clearly Cuba fits this definition. Please show me where I'm wrong.


You really are not an especially bright person, are you, Brandon.

Even some stupid people realize that while both fascism and communism often are present in totalitarian states...they are, by nature, almost polar....

There's only one way for you to prevail in this argument - show me in what way Cuba fails to fit the definition of fascism. If it fits the definition, then my use of the term was correct. If I apply an adjective accurately to a noun, then I am correct. You, in saying that I have applied the term improperly, are incorrect. Defend your statement or forfeit, your bad behavior notwithstanding.
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 11:22 am
NickFun wrote:
I would like a nice, legal Havana cigar. I think that alone is worth destroying the country and causing devastation in our usual way.


So would the average Cuban. Although they can buy them legally, most can't afford them. $2.50 for a cigar isn't doable when the average wage there is $15/month.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 11:44 am
bookmarking
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 11:47 am
SierraSong wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
SierraSong wrote:
Reporters Without Borders disagrees:


They may be more right about Cuba than the woman I'm in touch with. They may be more right about the other countries as well.


Highly likely since she's living in a country with no freedom of the press. Doubtful she'd be able to pick up a newspaper or turn on a radio or TV and learn the truth.


she works in the media there now ... and as any Canadian tourist can tell you it's not that difficult to get the news there - of course, the news is likely as balanced as it is in most countries - that is, not at all. Whether it's the U.S right-focussed media, or left-focussed media elsewhere, I don't expect any one country's media to provide a full picture of the world.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 11:51 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
There's only one way for you to prevail in this argument - show me in what way Cuba fails to fit the definition of fascism. If it fits the definition, then my use of the term was correct. If I apply an adjective accurately to a noun, then I am correct. You, in saying that I have applied the term improperly, are incorrect. Defend your statement or forfeit, your bad behavior notwithstanding.


Obviously you have major problems with logic, Brandon.

A fascistic regime is indeed a totalitarian regime.

But that does not mean that EVERY totalitarian regime is a fascistic one.

Some totalitarian regimes are communistic...not fascistic.

The come from opposite sides of the political spectrum, Brandon...with fascism usually associated with right wing or conservative politics...and communism with left wing or liberal politics.

It is not really all that hard to understand...and the fact that you have a habit of constantly declaring "victory" in these discussions will not change that.

Try to use your brain.

If you have one.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/17/2024 at 12:56:42