Brandon9000 wrote:Setanta wrote:Attacking a clearly marked red cross ambulance, that's an act of self-defense? Attacking water and sewage treatment plants, that's an act of self-defense? Attacking electric transmission stations and other appurtances of the power grid, that's an act of self-defense? The Israelis beaver away at digging their own grave, and you applaud them with a mindless mantra of "self-defense."
Please provide evidence that the Israelis attacked a Red Cross ambulance DELIBERATELY.
That is another unanswerable question, for it supposes that we can prove the intention of the pilot and his commanders, and those will ALWAYS claim it was accidental. The evidence can only be circumstantial, such as on the one hand the Israeli airforce being one of the most modern and well trained in the world and boasting about its surgical precision strikes with camera guided munitions and on the other hand an ambulance being a very recognisable target.
The there was the bombing of a clearly marked UN observation post (I repeat myself here), the location of which was known to the Israeli army for a long time, a bombing which took place after the UN had asked 10 times for the cessation of the shelling of the post by the Israelis. Israels reaction: Sorry!
You may also remember the bombing of a UN compound full of refugees in 1996, which took place after the UN had informed the Israelis of the presence of refugees in the compound. That one "accident" made more civilian victims (ca 100) than the thousands of Hezbollah rockets on Israel during this most recent Israeli invasion of their neighbouring country.
A bit longer ago there was the assassination of a Palestinian man in Oslo by the Israeli secret service. Basically the murder of a national of another democratic country on the orders of the state of Israel, which in itself goes against all international law and it also happened to be the wrong guy. Sorry.