SN95 wrote:For me, the story would make more sense if the roles were reversed. Instead of the normal view of the Father (as God) and the snake (as Satan), what if it were the other way around? Now we would have the snake (God) telling Adam/Eve to gain knowledge and understanding while the Father (Satan) wants to keep them ignorant. Far fetched for most Christians of today perhaps, but I believe this was a view held by at least some of the Gnostic sects.
I think the story being spun this way would be more acceptable. At least in this instance, the punisher of Adam and Eve is now Satan instead of God. All God did was allow his children to be free of ignorance and in doing so granted them free will.
You're not the first to propose the reversal of roles.
It seems difficult for many to grasp what God originally gave to Adam and Eve. If the tree had not been in the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve would have had perfect conscience, knowing intuitively know it was wrong to steal, etc. Without the tree, they could not have sinned, to be sure. But a conscience so bestowed would exclude free will. The tree represented their choice to either assent to conscience or make moral judgements on their own. They were free, and would have always been free, to choose a course of independence.