nimh wrote:I was thinking more John Kennedy Toole's Ignatius..
Or, shifting those words about slightly...
nimh
Someone just gave me that book last week. I read the first two pages then had to force myself to put it down because I want to finish "fiasco" and the Corn/Isikoff book.
The only known photo of Possum R FartBubble;
Which is from the 1920's.
Bernard - dont you have anything to say to this email?
nimh wrote:BernardR wrote:Nimh- I have worked in American Politics. You have not! I can tell you that polls seven weeks before the election are almost useless!!!
Is that why, even just in the past month, you have posted or referred to polls yourself
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here, here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here and
here?
(Thats 15 times if you're counting - an average of once every two days.)
Quote:His campaign manager, Tom Swan, did not address the content of the message, but said in response: "It is clear that Senator Lieberman would prefer to try to cloud Ned's statements from eight years ago, instead of talking about the important issues of national security, the war in Iraq and health care. It is shocking to see that his Senate staff, at taxpayer expense, is spending their time trying to make up dirt on Ned Lamont."
Huh. Wasn't it Lamont, though, that first brought all this up. Why wasn't
he sticking to the 'important' issues, then?
BernardR wrote:Nimh- I have worked in American Politics. You have not! I can tell you that polls seven weeks before the election are almost useless!!!
nimh wrote:Is that why, even just in the past month, you have posted or referred to polls yourself
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here, here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here and
here?
(Thats 15 times if you're counting - an average of once every two days.)
Yes, Bernard, where IS your response to that question?
I look for it and look for it, but I see it not.
Yes, as I am crouching I can ask Nimh to osculate me here and here and here and here and here and here and here!
Sierra Song wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
His campaign manager, Tom Swan, did not address the content of the message, but said in response: "It is clear that Senator Lieberman would prefer to try to cloud Ned's statements from eight years ago, instead of talking about the important issues of national security, the war in Iraq and health care. It is shocking to see that his Senate staff, at taxpayer expense, is spending their time trying to make up dirt on Ned Lamont."
Huh. Wasn't it Lamont, though, that first brought all this up. Why wasn't he sticking to the 'important' issues, then?
Hey Possum, why do you continue to piss in the sink?
Eh Beth wrote:
And my answer is:
BernardR wrote:Yes, as I am crouching I can ask Nimh to osculate me here and here and here and here and here and here and here!
BernardR wrote:Eh Beth wrote:
And my answer is:
Could you explain what you mean, Bernard?
I mean, Nimh( to paraphrase Gertrude Stein-) "A quote is a quote is a quote"
OK, but to quote BenardR: Where is YOUR answer to the original post? If polls are indeed almost useless seven weeks before the election, how come you'd quoted them yourself 15 times just in the past month?
Yuk, Lieberman is campaigning like a GWB mini-me:
Quote:Lieberman accused Lamont of flip-flopping on Iraq: "Three different positions, in three different places on three different days. That's quite a feat." [..]
"And so, one might say that he praised me before he criticized me," Lieberman said. "I couldn't resist that one."
Lieberman and Lamont lash out in Conn.