Bernard, you havent actually read Keltic's last post, have you?
nimh wrote:Bernard, you havent actually read Keltic's last post, have you?
nimh makes fatal error and takes any Possum post as if it came fro a rational nearly normal sane humanoid. shame on nimh.
I believe Dys has a crush on BernardR. He has a pet neme, follows him around and is always trying to pretend he doesn't care.
McGentrix wrote:I believe Dys has a crush on BernardR. He has a pet neme, follows him around and is always trying to pretend he doesn't care.
yes, of course, much the same as my feelings for McGentrix.
McGentrix- Isn't it clear to you that Dyslexia is dyslexic. He would not have named himself thus if he were not afflicted with the problem of having a primary reading disability. Therefore, McGentrix, be merciful to him. He is a disabled person and needs our compassion!!!
Yes, I read the post-Nimh--and the real value says- Keltic Wizard is campaign contributions and volunteers.
Now, did you read my post? I wrote that only 7.5% of the private working force is UNIONIZED and that the rest comes mainly from teachers unions whose members make so much money that most of them do not want to be around the great unwashed and do not have sympathy for the left wing liberal Michael Moore types!
Do you know, Nimh, that the election in November will revolved around TURNOUT and NOT number of people registered or number of people polled?
The typical Democrat voter is much lazier and unmotivated than the typical Republican voter in Connecticut.
Are you aware that the Connecticut Median salary is one of the highest in the United States? Do you think that those people are going to vote for a newcomer who will, if he is elected, raise their taxes to give to the "canaille"?
BernardR wrote:Yes, I read the post-Nimh--and the real value says- Keltic Wizard is campaign contributions and volunteers.
Now, did you read my post? I wrote that only 7.5% of the private working force is UNIONIZED
Yes, thats why I referred to Keltic's post. He already pointed out that the import of having union support is not some appeal it has to the overall population (since only a small minority is unionised and the unions dont enjoy high confidence ratings) - but to the manpower and resources they lend to a campaign. So yes, your numbers are correct, but they change nothing about the point Keltic made about why having union support is such good news for Lamont.
BernardR wrote:Are you aware that the Connecticut Median salary is one of the highest in the United States? Do you think that those people are going to vote for a newcomer who will, if he is elected, raise their taxes to give to the "canaille"?
I'm willing to bet that Lamont will actually do better in the wealthier part of the state than in the more working class parts.
What's hilarious is that Bernard was the one who brought up the importance of union endorsements in this thread, after reading about that rally in New Haven of a few unions for Lieberman.
Now that a lot of the big unions are coming out for Lamont, he's pounding away here about how inconsequential union support is.
He claims to read my post, yet has no answer for the fact that union support means not only financial support, but something even more valuable-many volunteers to man the phones, knock on doors and distribute campaign literature in shopping centers and downtown areas.
His hastily contrived synopsis about Connecticut being too rich to vote for a liberal can be disposed of by an examination of the voting records of Connecticut Republicans in Congress-Christopher Shays, Nancy Johnson, Rob Simmons-who vote liberal about half the time, according to the American Conservative Union. Remember-these are Connecticut's Republicans we are talking about.
Seems as though Possum R FartBubble has created his user name because he must indeed be a FartBubble, pay him no heed he can't help himself.
dyslexia wrote:Seems as though Possum R FartBubble has created his user name because he must indeed be a FartBubble, pay him no heed he can't help himself.
That's so cute! I bet you keep a small shrine of posts you have printed out in your bedroom, huh?
McGentrix wrote:dyslexia wrote:Seems as though Possum R FartBubble has created his user name because he must indeed be a FartBubble, pay him no heed he can't help himself.
That's so cute! I bet you keep a small shrine of posts you have printed out in your bedroom, huh?
I only print out your posts Mcgentrix and I put them on the walls of the guest room.
That's very nice of you, Dys.
It's so much more polite than printing them out on soft, absorbent rolls to be used in the bathroom.
"Please don't squeze the McGentrix posts".
BBB
kelticwizard wrote:That's very nice of you, Dys.
It's so much more polite than printing them out on soft, absorbent rolls to be used in the bathroom.
"Please don't squeze the McGentrix posts".
I know, for a fact, that Dys uses McGintrix's posts to line Fred's bird cage. Makes Fred sleep more and gives him an appropriate poop mat.
BBB
Yes, but at least mine are being read...
Well, obviously Dys's are as well.. you reply to them all the time.
McGentrix wrote:Yes, but at least mine are being read...
And bigger compliment still, McGentrix's words are even being parroted by others, (Fred is a parrot, right)?
Yes, but Dyslexia is dyslexic. That is almost as bad as having had a terrible myocardial infarction and needing stents in your heart arteries!
