15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 02:32 am
dyslexia wrote:
ican, every day in every way you remind me more and more of Milton Berle crossed with Ernie Kovacs. Did you ever do stage work?


Milton Berle was intelligent, he just acted stupid.

Ican is the real deal.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 05:57 am
Can anyone tell me, in all those 90 and 95 percent offers that were so generously offered to the palestinians, were they given water?
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 06:08 am
McTag wrote:
Surprise! US policy affects arab opinion, against reform

http://www.nytimes.....



You know, quoting the NY Times or the Washington Post these days is about the same deal as quoting stuff you see on bathroom walls.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 06:10 am
FreeDuck wrote:
Can anyone tell me, in all those 90 and 95 percent offers that were so generously offered to the palestinians, were they given water?


A human can live for about three days without water. You sort of have to assume that levantine slammites have all had water continuously since 2000 or they'd have all died after three days.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 06:27 am
Quote:
Bush and Condi clash over Israel; president overrules her for the first time

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has become increasingly dismayed over President Bush's support for Israel to continue its war with Hezbollah.

State Department sources said Ms. Rice has been repeatedly stymied in her attempts to pressure Israel to end strikes against Hezbollah strongholds in Lebanon. The sources said the secretary's trip to the Middle East last week was torpedoed by the Israeli air strike of a Lebanese village in which 25 people were killed.

"I've never seen her so angry," an aide said.

The U.S. response to the Israeli-Hezbollah war was said to have divided both the administration as well as the family of President George W. Bush. At the same time, it marked the first time since Ms. Rice became secretary of state that the president has overruled her.

"For the last 18 months, Condi was given nearly carte blanche in setting foreign policy guidelines," a senior government source familiar with the issue said. "All of a sudden, the president has a different opinion and he wants the last word."

The disagreement between Mr. Bush and Ms. Rice is over the ramifications of U.S. support for Israel's continued offensive against Lebanon. The sources said Mr. Bush believes that Israel's failure to defeat Hezbollah would encourage Iranian adventurism in neighboring Iraq. Ms. Rice has argued that the United States would be isolated both in the Middle East and Europe at a time when the administration seeks to build a consensus against Iran's nuclear weapons program.

Instead, Ms. Rice believes the United States should engage Iran and Syria to pressure Hezbollah to end the war with Israel. Ms. Rice has argued that such an effort would result in a U.S. dialogue with Damascus and Tehran on Middle East stability.

"The United States and Israel must understand that it is not in their long-term interests to allow themselves to become isolated in the Middle East and the world," said Sen. Chuck Hagel, a Rice ally and senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. "Both Damascus and Tehran must hear from America directly."

Ms. Rice has garnered support from several senior Republicans on the Foreign Relations Committee, including chairman Sen. Richard Lugar. Members of the inner circle of Mr. Bush's father, the former president, have also been advocating for an immediate ceasefire in Lebanon, with subsequent pressure on Israel for a diplomatic settlement with the Palestinians.

Ms. Rice's biggest supporter has been Brent Scowcroft, who served under the first Bush administration as national security advisor. Sources said Mr. Scowcroft, regarded as Ms. Rice's mentor, has been sending messages to his friends in Congress and the White House that U.S. support for the Israeli war could jeopardize relations with Gulf oil suppliers, particularly Saudi Arabia.

"A comprehensive peace settlement would not only defang the radicals in Lebanon and Palestine, and their supporters in other countries, it would also reduce the influence of Iran -- the country that, under its current ideology, poses the greatest potential threat to stability in Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Egypt and Jordan," Mr. Scowcroft wrote in a column in the Washington Post on July 30.

The sources said Mr. Bush's position has been supported by Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and to a lesser extent National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley. They have urged the president to hold off international pressure and give Israel more time to cause strategic damage to Hezbollah as well as Iranian and Syrian interests in Lebanon.

"I think if you think of what's happening in Lebanon and Israel right now, you see the face of the beginning of the 21st century," Mr. Rumsfeld said in a radio interview on Aug. 2.

Aides for Mr. Cheney have argued that the United States should have targeted Hezbollah and Syria during the war against Iraq in 2003. They said despite U.S. intelligence warnings Hezbollah was allowed to dominate Lebanon and build a formidable force along the Israeli border.

"There was talk of taking care of Hezbollah and Syria, but Condi and [then-Secretary of State Colin] Powell said 'no way. We don't need another front,'" an official said.

Mr. Bush's support for Israel has also struck a chord with most Americans. A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll reported that 59 percent supported Israel in the war against Hezbollah and only 13 percent of respondents backed an immediate ceasefire.

But the sources said Mr. Bush has been dismayed by the Israeli failure to defeat Hezbollah. They said several high-ranking Republicans have expressed amazement at the plodding Israeli advance into Lebanon.

"One Jewish friend of Bush actually called up a senior Israeli official and began yelling, 'What the hell's going on here,'" a source said. "'Are you going to fight or what?'"


From Insight Magazine
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 06:36 am
gungasnake wrote:
McTag wrote:
Surprise! US policy affects arab opinion, against reform

http://www.nytimes.....



You know, quoting the NY Times or the Washington Post these days is about the same deal as quoting stuff you see on bathroom walls.


I see you agree with what the NYT article says since you fail to give any evidence to counter it.

As the truth disagrees with your warped view of the world you are left with no choice but to attack the source.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 07:05 am
Quote:
So the Israelis warned the southern Shiites that they should flee north, otherwise these ordinary civilians would be considered fair game. So thousands flee north to Beirut and go to schools and other shelters in Shiite districts like Shiyah. So then the Israelis bomb Shiyah. If they were going to be bombed anyway, they may as well have stayed home.
Terror of war interrupts quiet evening in Shiyyah


source

An Israeli air raid has killed at least 17 Lebanese civilians who were fleeing southern border areas.

I am wondering what earthly good these leaflets dropped by Israel are other than some kind of PR sap. First they drop the leaflets warning citizens to flee to the north, then they bomb them when they leave and then they bomb them in the north after they get there.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 07:12 am
Dropping leaflets might give warnings to civilians to go to safer area and/or flush out Hez hiding spots.

I don't think it's PR but I also don't think it's entirely for reducing casualties which it certainly does.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 07:21 am
Quote:

He who writes on ****house walls
rolls his **** in little balls
He who reads these words of wit
EATS those little balls of ....



Source
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 07:38 am
Barak's Generous Offers... http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:VKA_yWTzO18J:gush-shalom.org/generous/generous.html+gush+shalom+peace+plan&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1&ie=UTF-8
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 08:24 am
Things have ratched up a bit; the Knesset has authorized, and the IDF has begun, escalation of ground action - while at the same time UN Resolution efforts have collapsed, evidently irretrievably, setting that process back to square one. This thing is far from over ... by a very long shot. Israel has the reigns, and that promises to be the case into the foreseeable future.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 08:27 am
You got it. This thing will be over when Hezbollah is thoroughly crushed.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 08:32 am
gungasnake wrote:
You got it. This thing will be over when Hezbollah is thoroughly crushed.


For Hezbollah to be thoroughly crushed is probably everybody's very best hope for peace.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 08:33 am
This thing will be over when Crazy Horse sucks my d!ck, G. A. Custer.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 08:39 am
Foxfyre wrote:

For Hezbollah to be thoroughly crushed is probably everybody's very best hope for peace.


Since there doesn't seem to end this peacefully and without innocents being killed: let's hope it works, by goodness!
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 08:39 am
Reuters withdraws the products of a photographer who altered at least two photos showing damage in Lebanon.

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/content/2006/08/reuters_removes.html
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 08:41 am
Forgot to add "concordance" in my above response ...Since there doesn't seem to be concordance how to end this peacefully ...
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 08:51 am
Regarding Condisleazy, since when does a secretary of state have carte blanche to set foreign policy. If she can't stand the directions from Bush, she should resign.

She may be in big trouble. Bush just gave her high praise, which is usually a precursor to the recipient getting getting dumped.

Blue, when you provide a link, please give your take on it.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 08:57 am
gungasnake wrote:
You got it. This thing will be over when Hezbollah is thoroughly crushed.


Right. Just as Iraq will be a peaceful democracy once the insurgency is thoroughly crushed...
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 09:06 am
Here is what might happen if Hezbollah wins. Lebanon will be destroyed, among other bad things.

http://www.slate.com/id/2147260/?nav=tap3
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 10/12/2024 at 07:24:02