15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Sep, 2009 04:12 pm
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:

Foofie wrote:

ican711nm wrote:

I think Israel should definitely be limited to expanding within Palestine and the Golen heights


It is a non-sequitor if the Palestineans and Arabs could learn to live at peace with Jewish Israelis, or with Christians in Lebanon for that matter. If they had a cosmopolitan attitude the area could thrive beyond the drip, drip of oil in the Arab countries. That is asking too much I guess from the region.


Interesting perspective. This takes a few minutes to watch, but it reinforces your perspective considerably. And it ultimately could be the salvation of the world and spares it from what appears to be an unrelenting expansion of Islam if two things happen: 1) Militant Islam runs out of oil and is reduced to impotency or 2) Islam learns to work and discovers that earning your own way is more fun than bludgeoning others into submission.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4C2TSUsoD4[/youtube]


In my opinion, the way to peace in the mideast is when Arab women assert their autonomy from a male-dominated society. Societies that advance usually have to have women functioning equal to males.


Well, blugeoning others into submission includes their attitudes toward and treatment of women I think. I have been following the story of the young women seeking asylum from her own family here in the U.S. She has recently converted from Islam to Christianity and believes that she is now the target of an intended 'honor killing'. It is bad enough when Christians and Jews ostracize their own who abandon some or all of the religious beliefs or those who ostracize or scorn those who choose to adopt a religious faith, but few religions these days, other than fundamentalist Islam, include corporal punishment or honor killings as part of their creed.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 04:43 am
Iranian President Once Again Claims Holocaust A Myth
By VOA News
18 September 2009



Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (file photo)
Iranian President President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has again called the Holocaust a lie by western nations designed to create a pretext for the creation of the Jewish state of Israel.

Mr. Ahmadinejad made the comments Friday as tens of thousands of Iranians filled the streets of the capital, Tehran, for an annual government-sponsored rally to express support for Palestinians and condemn Israel.

The Iranian president called the Holocaust a myth and an unproveable lie designed to promote support for Israel.

Opposition groups also took part in Friday's rally, despite a warning by security officials to stay away. Opposition activists sought to take advantage of the large gatherings to protest the disputed re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Witnesses say several opposition activists were arrested. Revolutionary Guards had promised to crack down on any protests during the rallies.

Following Iran's disputed June 12 elections, rights groups said hundreds of people were detained in clashes with security forces during post-election, anti-government demonstrations. Since then, authorities have held public trials of the accused and tried to marginalize moderate officials within the government.

Some information for this report was provided by AFP, AP and Reuters.


0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Sep, 2009 11:20 am
Teaching Hamas Children



September 23, 2009
Hamas children's program teaches kids to kill Jews
Obama's Partners for Peace. From Palestinian Media Watch:

The two hosts of a Hamas children's TV program use three different words for “slaughter” to describe how to rid Israel of Jews. The bear puppet Nassur explains that all Jews must be “erased from our land,” and the young host Saraa then specifies, "They'll be slaughtered."
Later in the conversation Nassur adds, "We want to slaughter them, Saraa, so they will be expelled from our land.” He repeats, “…We’ll have to [do it] by slaughter."

Three different Arabic expressions are used to describe the “slaughter” of the Jews: “Manhurin naher,” “Nidbah-hom” and “Shaht.”

The following is the transcript from the children’s program Tomorrow's Pioneers:

Nassur: “There won't be any Jews or Zionists, if Allah wills. They'll be erased.”
Saraa: “They'll be slaughtered.” (Manhurin naher)
Nassur: “And just like we will visit the Qaaba [in Mecca]... everyone will visit Jerusalem.”
[Seven-year old Palestinian child on phone tells how his father, a member of the Hamas Al-Qassam Brigades, “died as a Shahid (Martyr).”]
Nassur to child on phone: “What do you want to do to the Jews who shot your father?”
Child on phone: “I want to kill them.”
Saraa: “We don't want to do anything to them, just expel them from our land.”
Nassur: “We want to slaughter (Nidbah-hom) them, so they will be expelled from our land, right?”
Saraa: “Yes. That's right. We will expel them from our land using all means.”
Nassur: “And if they don't want [to go] peacefully, by words or talking, we’ll have to [do it] by slaughter.” (Shaht)
[Al-Aqsa (Hamas) TV, Sept. 22, 2009]
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Sep, 2009 02:03 pm
@Advocate,
If your post is true, then clearly, the solution to Hamas's programming Palestinian Arab children to slaughter Jews in Palestine, or erase Jews from Palestine, or expel Jews from Palestine is for Israel to NOW DO WHATEVER IS NECESSARY to conquer that part of Palestine controlled by Hamas.
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Sep, 2009 02:30 pm
@ican711nm,
I don't follow you. Did you mean to refer to "Pals" instead of "Jews?"
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Sep, 2009 03:02 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:
I don't follow you. Did you mean to refer to "Pals" instead of "Jews?"

NO!

I don't even understand why you are asking me that question!

Again:
ADVOCATE, if your post is true, then clearly, the solution to Hamas's programming Palestinian (i.e., PAL) children to slaughter Jews in Palestine, or erase Jews from Palestine, or expel Jews from Palestine, is for Israel (i.e., THE ISRAELI JEWS) to NOW DO WHATEVER IS NECESSARY to conquer that part of Palestine controlled by Hamas.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2009 11:33 am
Just mentioning that set in motion by the Balfour Declaration of 1917, the British mandate for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine was finally approved by the Council of the League of Nations and came into force this day in 1923.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2009 12:52 pm
I wonder what Israel will do now that it has been essentially proved that Iran has a nuclear weapons development program? What will the USA do? What will the U.N. do?

Does anybody think Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would not use a nuclear weapon on Israel if he became convinced nobody would retaliate? Does he have any reason to believe anybody would retaliate at this point?

Does anybody think Ahmadinejad would have any moral aversion to selling or giving nuclear devices, capability, or materials to rogue nations or terrorist organizations?
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2009 01:23 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:
Does anybody think Ahmadinejad would have any moral aversion to selling or giving nuclear devices, capability, or materials to rogue nations or terrorist organizations?

No moral aversion, but he might have what amounts to a power seeking aversion. He might want Iran's government to perpetrate the actual delivery and explosion of Iran's nuclear devices against the enemies of rogue nations or terrorist organizations.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Oct, 2009 02:02 pm
Hamas threatens to take more Israeli soldier hostages. This is what happens when a country is willing to pay tribute to kidnappers. But I guess Israel is too humane to not pay, and would continue to release hundreds of prisoners for a single kidnapped soldier.

http://en.rian.ru/world/20091003/156336550.html
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Oct, 2009 04:03 pm
@Advocate,

Quote:
03/10/2009
By Jack Khoury, Haaretz Correspondent and Haaretz Service
[...]

Hamas officials tell Arab press: Shalit deal is imminent

Meanwhile, Khaled Meshal, the Damascus-based head of the Hamas political bureau, told an Egyptian newspaper earlier this week that the deal reached for the videotape was an indication that a comprehensive prisoner swap was in the offing.

According to Israel Radio, Meshal told the Egyptian daily Al-Ahram that the Israeli government under the stewardship of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has dealt seriously with the Shalit matter.

The Islamist group is holding Shalit captive in hopes of using the soldier as a bargaining chip to win the release of hundreds of Palestinians who have been incarcerated in Israeli prisons for various security-related offenses.

Netanyahu's predecessor, Ehud Olmert, balked at Hamas' demand to release hundreds of prisoners "with blood on their hands," namely Palestinians who were involved in the planning of deadly suicide bombings in the heart of Israeli towns and cities.

Source: [url0http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1118474.html]Haaretz[/url]
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Oct, 2009 02:57 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Fatah, Hamas to sign reconciliation deal on October 25
Mon, 05 Oct 2009

Amman - A reconciliation agreement between the feuding Palestinian factions Fatah and Hamas is to be signed in Cairo on October 25, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit said Monday. Abul Gheit made the announcement after a meeting in Amman with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, which was also attended by head of the Egyptian Intelligence Department Omar Suleiman.

"The signing of the reconciliation accord in Cairo on October 25 will be followed by a meeting on October 26 of the Arab follow-up committee, which will also be attended by non-Arab parties and leaders of Palestinian factions," the Egyptian minister told a press conference held with his Jordanian counterpart Nasser Judeh.

Feuds between Hamas and its secular Palestinian rival Fatah mounted after Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip in June 2007, and ousted Abbas security forces.

Egyptian intelligence officials have been trying to broker an agreement between Hamas and Fatah, which controls Palestinian- administered areas of the West Bank, since March.
... ... ...
Source
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Oct, 2009 04:53 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
How about a reconcicliation agreement with of Fatah and Hamas with Israel?

As a prelude to that, how about Fatah and Hamas agreeing to Israel's right to exist in Palestine,
IF:
?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 10:38 am
Abbas complains that Israel is spending billions to purchase Jerusalem land. This seems to fly in the face of CI's constant ranting that Israel is stealing Pal land.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3786166,00.html
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Oct, 2009 02:40 pm
Quote:
Ramallah - European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana said Monday that the future Palestinian state should be established along the 1967 borders. He said in Ramallah after ending a day of meetings with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad that the sooner a Palestinian state is established the better.

"Our dream is to have a Palestinian state and the sooner the better," he said.
This state, he said, "will be constructed on territory marked by the borders of 1967," the date Israel occupied the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
"It may be necessary to swap some territory, but not to disturb the nature and continuity of the territory," he added.

Solana expressed support for a plan Fayyad had put forth last month which foresees the establishment of the foundations of a fully fledged state within two years.

He said, however, that the details and implementation of this plan should be concluded in negotiations between the Palestinians and Israel, which he hoped will resume soon following the process started in New York in September when Abbas had his first meeting with Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu in the presence of US President Barack Obama.

Solana said he supports efforts by Abbas to reunite the Palestinian people following their split after the Islamist Hamas movement took over control of the Gaza Strip from forces loyal to Abbas in June 2007.

He said that the EU supports Abbas' definition of government once a unity rule is established, which he said "can be acceptable by everybody in the international community."
[...]
Solana also said that the EU will support presence of a force on the ground in the Palestinian territory other than the EU Police Co- ordinating Office for Palestinian Police Support (EUPOL COPPs), which currently helps in training the police force.
"We cannot have a democratic state without the presence of a police force and the rule of law," he said.
Source
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2009 04:49 am
Israel has asked for Germany to supply it with (at least) two warships free of charge, German newspapers reported (today, Friday).
The Israeli state hopes Germany would help strengthen its defence forces by financing the costs for the two state-of-the-art corvettes.

The ships, which are hard to detect by radar, are reportedly to be built by Hamburg's Blohm + Voss shipyard (now owned by an Arabian company), while the weapons are to be provided by the USA, paied by Germany as well.

Germany has previously helped equip the Israeli navy, and delivered i.e. three submarines in the years 1999-2000.
Two further submarines are currently being built in Kiel, costing at least 500 million euros apiece, of which Germany pays more than a third.
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2009 05:05 am
@Walter Hinteler,

I'm going to apply to Germany to ask it to supply me with two BMWs free of charge, then.

I've got as much chutzpah as the next man.
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2009 07:09 am
@McTag,
I guess it is beyond your comprehension that Germany owes something to the Jews.

Walter, the Pals have, as a precondition, always demanded the right of return and complete control of Jerusalem. Has that changed?
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2009 08:00 am
@Advocate,

What, this is supposed to be some form of reparation?

Arguable, wouldn't you say, that the German State (not the Nazi Reich) owes the State of Israel (not the Jewish race) anything any more?
What is the basis for asking for warships for free?
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2009 11:26 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


What, this is supposed to be some form of reparation?

Arguable, wouldn't you say, that the German State (not the Nazi Reich) owes the State of Israel (not the Jewish race) anything any more?
What is the basis for asking for warships for free?


Well, here's a comment from the Irish Sun website:
Quote:
Germany is getting away cheap; after slaughtering, dehumanizing, and torturing 6 million Jews for no other reason than they were born of the Jewish faith. Am Yosroel Chai!!!We have outlived and shall continue to outlive all those civilizations that tried to annihilate the Jewish people. Highrst regards, George Haas Past Commmander, Jewish War Veterans USA, Post 580, New Orleans, LA
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 11/18/2024 at 11:44:56