15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
FreeDuck
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 12:28 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

I've seen little or no anger or condemnation heaped on the terrrorists among the pro-Palestinian sympathizers on this thread or anywhere else. Everybody seems to lump those guys with the rockets and rocket launchers in with the general population and focuses all their condemnation on Israel who is defending its civilian population from attack.

Actually, it's you doing the lumping. You just commented on a Palestinian op-ed suggesting that he, the writer, who is clearly not a terrorist, should stop launching missiles at Israel if he wants to live a normal life. People on this thread defend the Palestinian humans, not the militants. It is you who want to declare all Palestinians guilty of being terrorists in order to not have to feel the enormity of their plight and to absolve Israel of all responsibility in the situation.
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 12:32 pm
@FreeDuck,
You apparently have read nothing I've posted today. Why don't you do that and correct your misconceptions about what I said, and then perhaps we can have a discussion based on what was said rather than what you want me to have said.
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 12:36 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

You apparently have read nothing I've posted today. Why don't you do that and correct your misconceptions about what I said, and then perhaps we can have a discussion based on what was said rather than what you want me to have said.

Why don't you stop pretending like you have some authority about what I read and write. Whether you wish to participate in the dismantling of your arguments is up to you, but it won't stop me from doing so.
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 12:38 pm
@FreeDuck,
My authority about what you read or write is what you say about what I write, presumably based on what you think you have read. I won't have a discussion based on your assumptions that bear little resemblance to what I actually said.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 01:39 pm
@Foxfyre,
That's a pretty tough call; when you contradict yourself so often, how is anybody else supposed to keep track of what you say?

Your assumptions are questioned more often than any other posters on a2k. Why do you think that's the case?
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 01:45 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

My authority about what you read or write is what you say about what I write, presumably based on what you think you have read. I won't have a discussion based on your assumptions that bear little resemblance to what I actually said.

Like I said, I don't require your participation. You have no authority.
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 01:52 pm
@FreeDuck,
Authority to hold an opinion and express it? I think I probably have as much authority to do that as you do. And I have the authority to say that you misrepresented what I said. And you did. And I do say that.
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 01:58 pm
@Foxfyre,
Feel free to back it up, if that's the case.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 01:59 pm
@Foxfyre,
Who's talking about "authority?" We're talking about basing one's opinions that is consistent what was said before. You have the "authority" to continue on your SOP of back-tracking on stuff you've said before, but we will challenge them we we find your statements to be inconsistent. What "authority" are you talking about?

We have the "freedom of speech."
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 02:07 pm
@FreeDuck,
FreeDuck wrote:

Feel free to back it up, if that's the case.


I specifically suggested that you go back and read everything on this thread I’ve said today. It hasn’t been a lot and wouldn’t have been hard. However

I said
Quote:
How about the Palestinians take the initiative here and insist that the bad guy doesn't place his missile launcher in the middle of his family and their neighbors? That would remove all civilians from any risk of Israeli attack whatsoever.


You said
Quote:
You just commented on a Palestinian op-ed suggesting that he, the writer, who is clearly not a terrorist, should stop launching missiles at Israel if he wants to live a normal life.


Is that what I said. Really? That's what you got out of what I said?

I said
Quote:
It is a tragedy for the Palestinian civilians who are powerless in this situation. But to heap sympathy on the terrorists while condemning the Israelis is only encouraging and pushing the terrorists to continue their efforts. World opinion should come down on those terrorists with a vengeance with unequivocable terms that the militants disarm and stand down before any negotiations on behalf of the Palestinians would be conducted, and that would probably end the problem. There is no history of the Israelis being unreasonable with anybody who is not intent on destroying Israel and/or the Israelis.


You said
Quote:
It is you who want to declare all Palestinians guilty of being terrorists in order to not have to feel the enormity of their plight and to absolve Israel of all responsibility in the situation.


I said all Palestinians are guilty of being terrorists? You read that in what I said? Perhaps you could stretch reeeeeeaally far and try to draw that conclusion from my comments today. Otherwise you're as bad as C.I. in accusing me of what I've said that I didn't say; what I think that I don't think; what I don't know that I know.

That should be enough for a sampling.
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 02:53 pm
@ican711nm,
You have to understand that CI is the master of the baseless assertion. He will even tell you that that Israel killed hundreds of thousands of Pals, which is a joke. It is more like 10,000 since Israel was created.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 03:09 pm
@Advocate,
Please copy and paste where I said such a thing. You sure it was me or was it taken from a third-party article?

When I use that kind of number, I'm usually talking about the innocent Iraqis killed. If you've paid any attention to my most recent posts, they are taken from reliable sources on casualities from Israel.

It's up to you to challenge those sources if you question them.
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 04:18 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Since when is any type of boycott illegal?
The US can choose to trade or not trade with anyone they choose, there is nothing illegal about that.

But the claim was that there was an "illegal BLOCKADE".
A blocjkade infers that there are warships blocking access to Cuban waters, stopping every foreign vessel trying to enter Cuban ports.
It also suggests that the US is using force to stop other countries from trading with Cuba, and that is not happening.

But to use your logic, any country that refuses to trade with or recognize Israel is also guilty of an "illegal" act, arent they?
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 04:21 pm
@cicerone imposter,
That's dated March of 2003; it doesn't prove anything based on today's events in Israel.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 04:44 pm
@mysteryman,
What isn't relative to today? Show me proof it isn't?
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 04:47 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Why should I? I just made people aware that your post was overly outdated info. If you want current info, you can do that, you know. I'm not your gofer.
Please remember that in the future. Thx.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2009 06:03 pm
@mysteryman,
One point for mm. :0
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2009 12:40 am
So our local Evangelical High School ("Evangelisches Gymnasium') invited a class from the Greek Orthodox High School in Beit Sahour.*

It lasted several months until these pupils got the "safety certificate" that they were terrorists... just for passing the border to get to Amman airport (they are not allowed to fly via Tel Aviv). [The reason for the longer than usual delay was that they wanted to raise money for the tickets vis some movie evenings, showing films/dvd's they got from the German diplomatic representative in Palestine; however, there's an assembly ban ...]

*They'll come in the summer. - The Catholic high school invited some Palestine pupils from an Evangelical high school; here, it's not clear, if and when they'll come.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2009 07:16 am
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

I said
Quote:
How about the Palestinians take the initiative here and insist that the bad guy doesn't place his missile launcher in the middle of his family and their neighbors? That would remove all civilians from any risk of Israeli attack whatsoever.


You said
Quote:
You just commented on a Palestinian op-ed suggesting that he, the writer, who is clearly not a terrorist, should stop launching missiles at Israel if he wants to live a normal life.

Yes, I did. But I wasn't talking about your quoted passage above. I was talking about this one:
Foxfyre wrote:

Stop launching the rockets and there will be no fire from any firepower at all. Such a simple idea and so hard for some people to grasp.


Quote:
Is that what I said. Really? That's what you got out of what I said?

Yes. It may not have been what you meant at this time, but your message has been abundantly clear in every debate. You pretty clearly believe that the Palestinian people are at fault for whatever befalls them and you make little effort to differentiate between militants and civilians. You show no concern for the humanitarian disaster that is Gaza and no interest in what could be going on in the lives of Palestinians that might be fueling this conflict. You feel excessive military action is justified because of fear felt by residents of Sderot, but cannot extend that thinking to deduce that Palestinians have been experiencing that fear to the 10th power for decades, and of course any violence by them is completely unacceptable.

Quote:
You said
Quote:
It is you who want to declare all Palestinians guilty of being terrorists in order to not have to feel the enormity of their plight and to absolve Israel of all responsibility in the situation.


I said all Palestinians are guilty of being terrorists? You read that in what I said? Perhaps you could stretch reeeeeeaally far and try to draw that conclusion from my comments today. Otherwise you're as bad as C.I. in accusing me of what I've said that I didn't say; what I think that I don't think; what I don't know that I know.

I said you want to, not that you do. I think you walk a fine line and are careful with your speech but that you espouse all the same logical arguments that more or less boil down to the fact that you believe all Palestinians are legitimate targets. And I'll repeat that you ignore the enormity of their plight and are blind to the connection between that and the violence.

For someone who clearly has a great interest in this issue and apparently reads a lot about the situation there, how is it that you don't know to what extent Israel controls the lives and movement of the Palestinians? How do you not know that the "security wall" is/was being built on Palestinian land, the effects of the settlements on any possibility of a future Palestinian state, and that Israel regularly demolishes houses of and refuses to issue building permits for Palestinians? I ask these questions but I know the answer.

I posted one op-ed from a Palestinian that wasn't even that controversial in terms of the positions taken. Maybe you could look into what he's saying before reflexively attacking it. He's not a Hamas leader, he's just a Palestinian Human. Perhaps he has a legitimate perspective that you should consider.

And as for the argument that those of us who argue for the Palestinian people are somehow supporting terrorists -- well, what utter bullshit. The fact of the matter is that my tax money goes toward building weapons for Israel that they use to kill Palestinians. It also goes for untold amounts of foreign aid, some of which, for all I know, could be used to build settlements that establish "facts on the ground" designed to prevent a Palestinian state ever. Because of this, I care a great deal about what goes on there and would like to see justice served, and I don't think it's in our interest to blindly accept everything Israel does as right and just. It clearly isn't.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2009 07:38 am
@mysteryman,
I think that you should stop flaming people.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 06:13:17