ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

Advocate, Nobody is advocating the disarming of Israel. It's about providing the Palestinians with democracy; protection of their property, freedom of movement, and equal treatment under its laws.

Nobody would advocate for the disarming of the US. If they did, they would be seen as fools.

What are you talking about? Pals in Israel always had those things. Those outside of Israel had them until after the '67 war. Before that, when Israelis had never set foot in Palestine, the Pals mounted hundreds of attacks on Israel.

Advocate, Nobody is advocating the disarming of Israel. It's about providing the Palestinians with democracy; protection of their property, freedom of movement, and equal treatment under its laws.



Nobody would advocate for the disarming of the US. If they did, they would be seen as fools.

As used in this chapter -

(a) The terms ''arms control'' and ''disarmament'' mean the

identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control,

reduction, or elimination, of armed forces

We wonder whether the international community should propose another: to disarm the United States and all other States of weapons of mass destruction and sophisticated war paraphernalia.

So as you can see, there actually ARE people calling for the US to be disarmed,and the part of the US code I quoted could be read to mean the US to disarm also.

Presidential control of exports and imports of defense articles and services, guidance of policy, etc

mysteryman wrote:

So as you can see, there actually ARE people calling for the US to be disarmed,and the part of the US code I quoted could be read to mean the US to disarm also.

Could you please explain, why definitons from the "ARMS EXPORT CONTROL - Control of arms exports and imports" "could be read to mean the US to disarm"?

Are you really saying that an US-President is going to disarm the US?

Quote:

Presidential control of exports and imports of defense articles and services, guidance of policy, etc

An ultimate goal of the United States is a world which is free

from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of armaments;

in which the use of force has been subordinated to the rule of law;

and in which international adjustments to a changing world are

achieved peacefully. It is the purpose of this chapter to provide

impetus toward this goal by creating a new agency of peace to deal

with the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking

toward ultimate world disarmament

mysteryman wrote:

So as you can see, there actually ARE people calling for the US to be disarmed,and the part of the US code I quoted could be read to mean the US to disarm also.

Could you please explain, why definitons from the "ARMS EXPORT CONTROL - Control of arms exports and imports" "could be read to mean the US to disarm"?

Are you really saying that an US-President is going to disarm the US?

Quote:

Presidential control of exports and imports of defense articles and services, guidance of policy, etc

Walter Hinteler wrote:

mysteryman wrote:

So as you can see, there actually ARE people calling for the US to be disarmed,and the part of the US code I quoted could be read to mean the US to disarm also.

Could you please explain, why definitons from the "ARMS EXPORT CONTROL - Control of arms exports and imports" "could be read to mean the US to disarm"?

Are you really saying that an US-President is going to disarm the US?

Quote:

Presidential control of exports and imports of defense articles and services, guidance of policy, etc

You have to understand that MM is a literalist.

All those calls for the disarmament of the US is just pie in the sky. It'll never happen no matter what nut-case calls for it.

I absolutely agree with you.
FACT: The US spends more on our military than all of Europe combined.
That will not change just because some "foolish" people think their rhetoric has any value.

Who's going to enforce it? DUH!

You are the one that said...
[quote]Nobody would advocate for the disarming of the US

There's no cure for stupid; this world is full of them.

Olmert Warns of End of Israel

Thursday, November 29, 2007 11:57 PM

In unusually frank comments, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert warned in an interview published Thursday that "the state of Israel is finished" if a Palestinian state is not created, saying the alternative was a South African-style apartheid struggle.


The explosive reference to apartheid came as Olmert returned from a high profile peace conference in Annapolis, Md., hoping to prepare a skeptical nation for difficult negotiations with the Palestinians.


Just hours after his return, the Israeli leader received an important boost when police recommended that prosecutors drop an investigation into whether he illegally intervened in the government's sale of a bank two years ago. The threat of indictment in the case cast a cloud over Olmert for months.


While Olmert has long said that the region's demography was working against Israel, the comments published in the Haaretz daily were among his strongest. Israeli officials have long rejected any comparison to the racist system once in place in South Africa.

Under the heading of "Doh...and why the hell did it take you so long to wake up?"

Quote:

Olmert Warns of End of Israel

Thursday, November 29, 2007 11:57 PM

In unusually frank comments, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert warned in an interview published Thursday that "the state of Israel is finished" if a Palestinian state is not created, saying the alternative was a South African-style apartheid struggle.


The explosive reference to apartheid came as Olmert returned from a high profile peace conference in Annapolis, Md., hoping to prepare a skeptical nation for difficult negotiations with the Palestinians.


Just hours after his return, the Israeli leader received an important boost when police recommended that prosecutors drop an investigation into whether he illegally intervened in the government's sale of a bank two years ago. The threat of indictment in the case cast a cloud over Olmert for months.


While Olmert has long said that the region's demography was working against Israel, the comments published in the Haaretz daily were among his strongest. Israeli officials have long rejected any comparison to the racist system once in place in South Africa.

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/olmert_end_of_israel/2007/11/29/53363.html

Can't you post it? Muslim-Israelis, in general, have lives better than Muslims in the rest of the ME.