15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Aug, 2006 03:11 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:

The Arabs are particularly animalistic in their actions. With Israel, there are, necessarily, collateral deaths. But it is beyond revulsion to take two innocent boys and stone them to death.


Of course it is. Let me ask you, was Jenin a 'neccessary collateral' death?

I'll never forget it until the day I die

Cycloptichorn



Were you there? What did you remember [with link]?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Aug, 2006 03:40 pm
McTag wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
Hezbollah and Hamas must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.


whisperology


Ican, Hamas were voted into power in Gaza. They ARE the Palestinians.

Likewise, Hezbollah are very popular in Lebanon and would most likely form a majority party there, given elections soon.

Damned inconvenient, democracy, at times.

So your post, like so many of your other posts, is unhelpful.


I posted: Hezbollah and Hamas must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

I did not post: Lebanon and Palestine must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

So far, in the USA no individual political party is separately armed for defense; only the national government is armed for defense.

I did not post: Hezbollah and Hamas must be disenfranchised to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

www.m-w.com
Quote:
Main Entry: dis·arm
Pronunciation: dis-'ärm, diz-, 'dis-"ärm
Function: verb
Etymology: Middle English desarmen, literally, to divest of arms, from Anglo-French desarmer, from des- dis- + armer to arm
transitive verb
1 a : to deprive of means, reason, or disposition to be hostile <disarmed> b : to win over
2 a : to divest of arms <disarm> b : to deprive of a means of attack or defense <disarm> c : to make harmless <disarm>
intransitive verb
1 : to lay aside arms
2 : to give up or reduce armed forces
- dis·ar·ma·ment /-'är-m&-m&nt/ noun
- dis·arm·er noun

Main Entry: dis·en·fran·chise
Pronunciation: "dis-in-'fran-"chIz
Function: transitive verb
: to deprive of a franchise, of a legal right, or of some privilege or immunity; especially : to deprive of the right to vote
- dis·en·fran·chise·ment /-"chIz-m&nt, -ch&z-/ noun


Damned convenient, is real democracy.

So your post, like so many of your other posts, is unhelpful.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Aug, 2006 11:41 pm
ican711nm wrote:
McTag wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
Hezbollah and Hamas must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.


whisperology


Ican, Hamas were voted into power in Gaza. They ARE the Palestinians.

Likewise, Hezbollah are very popular in Lebanon and would most likely form a majority party there, given elections soon.

Damned inconvenient, democracy, at times.

So your post, like so many of your other posts, is unhelpful.


I posted: Hezbollah and Hamas must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

I did not post: Lebanon and Palestine must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

So far, in the USA no individual political party is separately armed for defense; only the national government is armed for defense.

blah blah blah



As I pointed out, Hamas and Hezbollah carry the popular vote in Gaza and Lebanon, precisely because they attempt to stand up to the Israelis.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 06:30 am
McTag wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
McTag wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
Hezbollah and Hamas must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.


whisperology


Ican, Hamas were voted into power in Gaza. They ARE the Palestinians.

Likewise, Hezbollah are very popular in Lebanon and would most likely form a majority party there, given elections soon.

Damned inconvenient, democracy, at times.

So your post, like so many of your other posts, is unhelpful.


I posted: Hezbollah and Hamas must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

I did not post: Lebanon and Palestine must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

So far, in the USA no individual political party is separately armed for defense; only the national government is armed for defense.

blah blah blah



As I pointed out, Hamas and Hezbollah carry the popular vote in Gaza and Lebanon, precisely because they attempt to stand up to the Israelis.


And just look at how successful they have been in bettering the lives of their fellow country men and women!
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 06:34 am
Quote:
And just look at how successful they have been in bettering the lives of their fellow country men and women!


Unfortunately, for simplistic demonization goals, they have and they continue to do so. Refusal to understand/acknowledge that ain't gonna make solutions either more obvious nor more realistically workable.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 06:37 am
ican711nm wrote:
McTag wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
Hezbollah and Hamas must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.


whisperology


Ican, Hamas were voted into power in Gaza. They ARE the Palestinians.

Likewise, Hezbollah are very popular in Lebanon and would most likely form a majority party there, given elections soon.

Damned inconvenient, democracy, at times.

So your post, like so many of your other posts, is unhelpful.


I posted: Hezbollah and Hamas must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

I did not post: Lebanon and Palestine must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

So far, in the USA no individual political party is separately armed for defense; only the national government is armed for defense.


If you want to make a comparison with the USA, the states in the 1770s would make a better comparison IMO. Not everyone agreed with the secessionists, nor was disarming them possible. And evidently, they did not want to be "protected" or "freed" under the conditions offered.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 06:38 am
In fact, Hamas won a majority in the recent elections precisely because they have long had a highly successful program of delivering social welfare to Palestinians. Of course, this falls below the recognition horizon of the right wing, because it forms no part of Israeli propaganda.

Hezbollah claims to represent the Twelver Shi'ites of the Lebanon. Given sectarian animus among Muslims (little different from that which operates among Christians), there is no good reason to assume that Hezbollah cares if it represents or does any good for Sevener Shi'ites or the Druze. Shi'ites represent roughly 40% of the population of the Lebeanon, with Twelver Shi'ites constituting about 35% of the population. Hezbollah has never attained to as much as 10% of the representation in the Lebanese parliament. There is no good reason to assume that Hezbollah was ever a very popular organization in the Lebanon, since they were not able even to represent politically all of the portion of the Lebanese population which they claimed to represent.

However, the hysterical and futile Israeli response to the Hezbollah raid may well have increased popular support for Hezbollah, which can hardly be considered to have been one of their operational goals. The Lebanese, however, endured a long and anguished civil war before Hezbollah even came into existence, and have shown a praise-worthy judiciousness in their attitude toward their governments and the various political groups and militias in their nation, as well as great resiliance. Therefore, i suggest and hope that the increase in support for Hezbollah will not be great, and that Israelis, despite their best efforts to sh*t in their own nest, will not have done that much damage to the polity of the Lebanon.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 06:46 am
blatham wrote:
Quote:
And just look at how successful they have been in bettering the lives of their fellow country men and women!


Unfortunately, for simplistic demonization goals, they have and they continue to do so. Refusal to understand/acknowledge that ain't gonna make solutions either more obvious nor more realistically workable.


Translation anyone?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 06:57 am
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
Quote:
And just look at how successful they have been in bettering the lives of their fellow country men and women!


Unfortunately, for simplistic demonization goals, they have and they continue to do so. Refusal to understand/acknowledge that ain't gonna make solutions either more obvious nor more realistically workable.


Translation anyone?


Yes:

Despite the best efforts of the right to paint Hamas as wild-eyed, blood-thirsty terrorists, everyone of them, they continue to be of crucial benefit to their fellow Palestinians precisely because of their effective social relief programs. Failing to understand that part of the equation won't help to find a solution to the problems in Palestine/Israel.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 09:56 am
Israel's massive responses to attacks by Hamas and Hezbollah are forcing the controlled Arab populations to realize that the organizations are bad for their health. The controlled populations will probably also understand that the charitable work the organizations perform is window dressing for their real goal, which is to destroy Israel.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:01 am
Advocate wrote:
Israel's massive responses to attacks by Hamas and Hezbollah are forcing the controlled Arab populations to realize that the organizations are bad for their health. The controlled populations will probably also understand that the charitable work the organizations perform is window dressing for their real goal, which is to destroy Israel.


You are living in a complete fantasy world, Advocate.

And why such a stringent supporter of Israel? You know that they aren't the 'good guys' that they are made out to be.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:03 am
Advocate wrote:
..... The controlled populations will probably also understand that the charitable work the organizations perform is window dressing for their real goal, which is to destroy Israel.


Well that's true- no subterfuge is employed, though, so it's not exactly "window dressing".
0 Replies
 
Asherman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:24 am
Set, Do you see Hezbollah as primarily an organization devoted to the social welfare of its constituency, or as an agency devoted to the violent elimination of the State of Israel? Personally, I find it hard to see Hezbollah as a modern day Muslim version of the Tweed Ring or Tammany. It seems to me that their idea of "social work" is as cynical and exploitive as Tammany or Tweed. The difference is that those venerable, patriotic New York political associations worked toward Democratic elective power, whereas Hezbollah's whole purpose for existence is the destruction of a neighboring State. Imagine, Tammany rallying oppressed Irish immigrants to invade and destroy New Jersey. Which comes first the horse, or the carriage?

If Hezbollah has done something right and useful for fellow Muslims, does that excuse their intranscience on the question of accepting Israel's right to exist? They initiated this most recent clash of arms, not Israel. Crossing the border, killing Israeli citizens and kidnapping members of the Israeli military was absolutely an act of war carried out by an organization dedicated to terrorism and not controlled by their host government. What should Israel have done after decades of terrorist attack from Hezbollah? Israel responded with massive force designed to destroy and disrupt Hezbollah's capacity to harm Israel and its citizens. In Hezbollah country, the "socially conscious" and benevolent leadership hid their missiles and bunkers in, or near, hospitals, schools, and mosques. Those dastard Jews didn't play fair, they put as much of their civilian population in bunkers as distant from military targets as possible. The result, in Israel the number of casualties was small, but from Lebanon we were awash in grisly photographs of mangled and maimed children. Obviously the Jews are the heartless murderers of children, while Hezbollah is the victim once again of Israeli aggression. Ah, the wonders of modern media warfare.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 11:36 am
McTag wrote:

...
ican711nm wrote:
Hezbollah and Hamas must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

...
As I pointed out, Hamas and Hezbollah carry the popular vote in Gaza and Lebanon, precisely because they attempt to stand up to the Israelis.


AND, as I pointed out, Hezbollah and Hamas must be disarmed to free the Lebanese and Palestinians, as well as protect the Israelies.

The most effective way for the Palestinians and Lebanese to stand up to the Israelies, is: first for them to stop tolerating those Hamas and Hezbollah in their midst who continually murder and advocate the murder of Israelies, and; second, for them to promote more productive free enterprise competition.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 12:14 pm
Asherman wrote:
Set, Do you see Hezbollah as primarily an organization devoted to the social welfare of its constituency, or as an agency devoted to the violent elimination of the State of Israel?


You have a major disconnect going on here, Ash. I did not at any time suggest or state that Hezbollah is an organization devoted to the social welfare of its constituency. I made the remark that Hamas has long run large and effective social welfare programs, which explains in large measure why they attained the electoral support of a majority of Palestinians. The post you have made is predicated upon an assumption about what i had written which is false.

****************************************

As for Hezbollah, i see it as simply another Lebanese militia, and the "last-man-standing" in the Lebanese milita game. If you go back to read carefully what i wrote, i pointed out that Hezbollah has not attracted the support of even the majority of the Lebanese they claim to represent, the Twelver Shi'ites. Perhaps i ought to have stated in bold face and all in caps what was implicit in that. That is that i don't see Hezbollah as representative of any group in the Lebanon.

When the Lebanese civil war began, before Israel became involved, and while the Shah still sat upon the "Peacock Throne," there was only one discrete and intentionally organized militia in the Lebanon, the Christian Maronite militia. But the Maronite Phalangists were seen, justifiably, as a fascist majority intent on dominating all the other Christians of the Lebanon and the Muslims. Local militia groups, organized around villages or city neighborhoods effectively disrupted the shakey status quo through attacks on the Maronite militia. This lead to the civil war, and the then Prime Minister of the Lebanon (forget his name, anyone interested can go look it up) bascially blackmailed Syria to intervene, because Lebanon was the terminus for imports and exports for Syria. Therefore, Syria intervened on behalf of the Christian, Maronite militia.

Long ago, perhaps in this thread, i provided a break-down of religious confession in the Lebanon, based on information from a site maintained by the Lebanese government, but i'm not going to repeat the exercise. Therefore, very roughly, this is the breakdown: significantly less than 50% of the population are Christian, divided between Maronites, Syriac Christians, Greek Orthodox and all other sects. Among those sects, except for the Greek Orthodox, of course, they are divided between "Catholics" and "Orthodox" depending upon whether they recognize the spiritual supremacy of the Pope or the Patriarch. They don't get along, and the Maronites are nobody's pals, especially because of the Phalange. Of the remaining considerably more than 50%, betwen 5% and 10% are Sunni Muslims, roughly 5% are Druze (whom neither Sunnis nor Shi'ites consider to be Muslim at all), about 5% are Sevener Shi'ties (i've explained this distinction too many times to want to rehearse it), and almost 40% of the entire population are Twelver Shi'ites, the largest single confession in the Lebanon.

The Syrians were never comfortable supporting a Christian militia, and especially one with a murky, possibly fascist past. They began to organize another, counterbalancing militia, the Syrian Socialists (the Syrians were still slitting each others throats within the Ba'athist Arab Socialist Party--Assad had not yet come to power). But as they were centered in the distinctly minority Sunni population, they only ever survived because they were organized, supported and supplied by the Syrians. The Shi'ites remained without a central militia, and no resource to equip and support one--and that refers only to the Twelvers--i don't believe the Sevener Shi'ites ever had a militia of their own. The Druze had no formal militia, but they were suspected of being supported and supplied (they were heavily armed) by their Druze confreres in Israel--the Druze in Israel overwhelmingly support the government.

All of this occurs before the Shah is overthrown, and before Israel invades the Lebanon. After the overthrow of the Shah, the Persians began to develop an anti-Israeli propaganda. This is not surprising, as the Shah's secret police, the SAVAK, were organized, trained and supported by the CIA and Israel's Mossad. After the seizure of the American embassy, the Persians had a lot of documentary evidence that Mossad has supported SAVAK after the Americans had pulled out (late 1950s). That only fueled anti-Israeli sentiment in revolutionary Iran. In 1982, Israel launched Operation Litani, in which they invaded southern Lebanon. This was in response to attacks by the PLO, which had been established in southern Lebanon since being driven out of Jordan in 1970-71. The PLO can't reasonably be seen as the cause of the civil war, but they were a major destabilizing factor, and the mortal enemies of the Maronite militia, who wanted them out of the Lebanon.

In 1982, after the Israeli invasion, the Persian Revolutionary Guard decided to redress the imbalance (as they saw it) in the Lebanon. After the Israeli invasion, and within Israeli controlled territory in southern Lebanon, the Maronites had slaughtered thousands of Palestinians in the refugee camps at Shatilla and Sabra. This may have been the deciding factor with the Persians, who infiltrated the Lebanon, and organized and funded a Shi'ite militia. The Persians are overwhelmingly Twelver Shi'ites, and so they were attempting to build a base with the largest single confessional group in the Lebanon. That was the origin of Hezbollah. Despite claiming to represent the Shi'ites of the Lebanon, they have never captured even as much as 10% of the Lebanese parliament, which means they can't claim the support of more than a quarter of Lebanese Shi'ites, if even that many. But as the largest single group from which to recruit in the Lebanon, and with the withdrawl of support by Syria of the Maronite militia after Shatilla and Sabra, and the collapse of the Sunni militia--the "Syrian Socialists"--this left the Hezbollah militia as the last truly effective militia in the Lebanon. I have no specific knowledge that Hezbollah carries out significant social support programs in the Lebanon, and have never made such a claim.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 12:23 pm
I didn't find the Lebanese government page which i had found before, but here is the religious breakdown of the Lebanon at the CIA Fact Book's Lebanon page:

Muslim 59.7% (Shi'a, Sunni, Druze, Isma'ilite, Alawite or Nusayri), Christian 39% (Maronite Catholic, Greek Orthodox, Melkite Catholic, Armenian Orthodox, Syrian Catholic, Armenian Catholic, Syrian Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Chaldean, Assyrian, Copt, Protestant), other 1.3%

Note that this does not break down percentages within Muslims and Christians, but i do recall that Shi'ites are around 40% of the population.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 12:45 pm
The real reason for the success of Hamas in the last election is the incompetence and corruption in the PLO.

There are major strikes going on in Palestine related to the nonpayment of wages to government workers since Hamas took control. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 12:53 pm
You display your ignorance. The ruling faction prior to the electoral victory of Hamas was Fatah, which is one of the factions which formed the Palestine Liberation Organization. All of Fatah is (or once was--the PLO hardly exists any longer) part of the PLO--not all of the PLO was comprised by Fatah. You can't expect your comments to be taken seriously if you make mistakes as clumsy and ill-informed as that.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 12:59 pm
I bet a lot of palestinians in Gaza are having buyers remorse these days.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 01:01 pm
Could be . . . time will tell . . . and Fox "News" will make something up if they think no one is looking . . .
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 10/07/2024 at 12:28:13