9
   

Contradictions in the Bible...

 
 
material girl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 10:22 am
yitwail wrote:
wandeljw wrote:

In my opinion, because the very definition of faith is belief without proof.


wandel, the dictionary agrees with you:

Quote:
1. Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
2. Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.



To people with faith-Do you look both ways before you cross the road?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 10:22 am
Setanta wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
It is also the greatest source of money to help the less fortunate etc. etc.


You just love to throw things like this out there without evidence. Can you demonstrate that this is true, or is it just a religionist's conceit?


Perhaps this is too sweeping. I can only vouch for my Church. Monies gave been provided for the hurricane disasters in the U.S. Disasters in Asia. Donations to Africa etc. etc. etc. This is not conceit....this is fact.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 10:37 am
Conceit lay in the contention that it were the greatest source . . . Hooters gave large sums of money for hurrican relief in the US, and when it was revealed that some people had abused government credit cards to buy champagne, Hooters stepped in and picked up that bill.

Shall we therefore decide that Hooters is an organization as charitable and morally correct as your church? Should we tout the employment of busty young women in skimpy outfits?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 10:39 am
Setanta wrote:
Conceit lay in the contention that it were the greatest source . . . Hooters gave large sums of money for hurrican relief in the US, and when it was revealed that some people had abused government credit cards to buy champagne, Hooters stepped in and picked up that bill.

Shall we therefore decide that Hooters is an organization as charitable and morally correct as your church? Should we tout the employment of busty young women in skimpy outfits?


If that is your pleasure. The bible seems to have little to say on this matter.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 10:41 am
I see . . . and if the bible has nothing to say on a topic, you're lost for a decision, huh?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 10:42 am
Setanta,
If you can show how this is relevent to the topic, I will be happy to answer.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 11:04 am
material girl wrote:
yitwail wrote:
wandeljw wrote:

In my opinion, because the very definition of faith is belief without proof.


wandel, the dictionary agrees with you:

Quote:
1. Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
2. Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.



To people with faith-Do you look both ways before you cross the road?


Question
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 11:08 am
wandeljw wrote:
material girl wrote:
yitwail wrote:
wandeljw wrote:

In my opinion, because the very definition of faith is belief without proof.


wandel, the dictionary agrees with you:

Quote:
1. Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
2. Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.



To people with faith-Do you look both ways before you cross the road?


We have faith. We are not stupid. You seem to have faith confused with blind stupidity. There is a difference, you know.

Question
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 11:09 am
It did some things which curbed the greed of kings and lesser nobles.

It demanded their spiritual allegiance and often got it in the name of a higher power without which we may still be on a weevilled loaf a day.

Who knows.

How would you have gone about transforming feudalism into a scientific society.

The mere fact that the Gospels were a sacred text was sufficient to mitigate the worst effects of kings. Admittedly not always (See the auction catalogue of Madame de Pompadour's knick-knacks.)
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 11:11 am
I seem to have messed up on the quoting. Apologies to wandeljw. The Question was his. The words were mine. Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 11:17 am
Intrepid wrote:
I seem to have messed up on the quoting. Apologies to wandeljw. The Question was his. The words were mine. Embarrassed


It's okay, Intrepid. I basically didn't understand the point of material girl's question. I agree with your answer, but only material girl can tell us why she asked the question in the first place.

Your question did not seem to pertain to the issue, material girl.
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Jul, 2006 10:36 pm
wandeljw wrote:
I just have a general comment regarding proof. Faith means believing in something where you have no proof. Even the most rigorous of scientists will admit that not everything can be proven or even understood.


Thank you wandel!

Now... I'm still trying to figure out how in the heck I missed all this! Holy crap!
0 Replies
 
material girl
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 01:54 am
Intrepid wrote:
wandeljw wrote:
material girl wrote:
yitwail wrote:
wandeljw wrote:

In my opinion, because the very definition of faith is belief without proof.


wandel, the dictionary agrees with you:

Quote:
1. Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
2. Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.



To people with faith-Do you look both ways before you cross the road?


We have faith. We are not stupid. You seem to have faith confused with blind stupidity. There is a difference, you know.

Question


Then whats the difference?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 04:51 am
I don't think you have the capacity to understand it.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 05:24 am
If the question is, "What's the difference between faith and stupidity?", even asked tongue-in-cheek (which it doesn't appear to be), I agree with Intrepid about the questioner's discernment.
0 Replies
 
material girl
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 05:27 am
Intrepid wrote:
I don't think you have the capacity to understand it.


Ive never been so patronized in my life.

Its a shame you dont feel as tho you have the ability or want to educate me.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 05:30 am
material girl wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
I don't think you have the capacity to understand it.


Ive never been so patronized in my life.

Its a shame you dont feel as tho you have the ability or want to educate me.


Well, don't get the vapors. Especially so soon after slandering everyone with faith.
0 Replies
 
material girl
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 05:38 am
snood wrote:
material girl wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
I don't think you have the capacity to understand it.


Ive never been so patronized in my life.

Its a shame you dont feel as tho you have the ability or want to educate me.


Well, don't get the vapors. Especially so soon after slandering everyone with faith.


When you write slander do you mean libel.

I was merely pointing out the facts I have observed that contradict a religion.
I have not yet been given evidence that faith works 100%
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 05:52 am
Quote:
I have not yet been given evidence that faith works 100%


Well, you gotta admit that's a far cry from suggesting faith and stupidity are synonymous.
And, yes, dear - since it was a written statement, it was more libel than slander. So astute of you.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 06:23 am
Intrepid wrote:
Setanta,
If you can show how this is relevent to the topic, I will be happy to answer.


You're hilarious--how has any of the drivel with which you've clogged this thread been relevant to the topic of contradictions in the bobble?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/17/2024 at 11:59:41