Setanta wrote:snood wrote:Oh bug off, Setanta - you troll my threads as much as ever you accuse me of doing. You stick your prodigious nose into whatever conflict I have, and take the opposite side like a little bitch.
I'm sure you know what it means to be a little bitch from personal experience--it does not describe me. Keep up the good work, boy, you'll get yourself banned again.
Quote:You and Lash have been stalking me for over a month, booby trapping evey thread I started.
You started a thread about redlining, and apparently didn't even know that it was called redlining, or that it has been well-known and well-discussed for years. Both Lash and i reponded, wtihout a single comment about you personally, and on topic. So you felt the need to attack Lash, even though her comment was directly related to Slappy's post. I have no regrets at all about telling you just how shitty your behavior is toward her.
When you got childish and whiney about it, i went away and left you to wallow in the mess you'd made in your own diaper.
Quote:I used to have some speck of respect for you, but you have no shame about slurring, then accusing someone else of it. Take your criticism and shove it. I can count on one hand everyone I have any conflict with on A2K - and not use all the digits. Can you say the same?
timberland doesn't need your defense, and neither does Lash, but you do it because you have something against me. and you don't even have the balls to admit that.
I wouldn't want your respect, because i have none for you. What i have against you is your vicious and puerile attacks on other members based soley upon your perceptions of their personal defects. In the case of the Big Bird and me, the defect you see is that we have "attacked" religion. In the case of Lash, it's because--as you made clear in a series of unsolicited PMs--you think she's a racist.
But you don't have the balls to admit that publicly.
There seems to be a 'breathing space' in all of the little firefights I have, except with you and lash, Setanta.
I have p-ssing contests with Frank Apisa, but then we have weeks where we can exchange thoughts without firing shots. I have differences with timberland, and dyslexia, and cjhsa, and a couple of others, but none of those relationships (for lack of better term) seems as poisoned as that with you and Lash.
Setanta, you seem to really have something against me that goes pretty deep.
You say its because I viciously attack those who attack religionists. I could say you don't lack at all in vicious attacks yourself, but I don't think you would have any of it.
I "have the balls" to admit anything I've done, but I have the feeling that you would find some exception to something else with no time to waste.
Let's see - I asked you in a PM if Lash is a racist because of the depth of dislike she has for me, and you said that you think she has those tendencies (I think you made reference to conversations in which she talked of her black "homies", or some such) - or do you deny telling me that?
The truth is, I'm afraid, that you and Lash won't take "yes"
or "no" for an answer from me. I am in the same irredeemable category for you that you two have put Arella Mae in - you two will never let things go with her, or me.
Now, I expect that you'll reply to the effect that this is all in my mind, and that you have no interest in answering me at all, except to not let me get away with any "special pleading" for religionists.
But there is something very unhealthy about the way you simply cannot let the hostility toward me go. It's not good, man.
I said earlier that these forums would be very drab without the spice you and some others provide, and I meant that.
But if you and Lash and I never exchange the kind of going-for-the-jugular darts that
all three of us have ever again, I wouldn't miss that at all.
