0
   

Thoughts on gun control

 
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:12 pm
It does seem a bit of a oxymoron when speaking of guns, bows and arrows and killing.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:21 pm
snood wrote:
Yeah, about time someone dealt with those pesky Cape Buffalo and Warthogs. They're a damn menace to civilisation...



Cape buffalo avoid the area where I live. Word gets out.....
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:25 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Unbelievable Shocked

OK: u can be SWEET to the robbers if u want to.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:38 pm
gungasnake wrote:
Here's another stray thought for the benefit of the anti-gunners here...

There actually are pistols which you could hit things with at 100 yards, but dealing with them pretty much defeats the purpose of pistols. You'd need a wheelbarrow or a knapsack or briefcase to carry the things around with.

What about the ordinary pistol which the ordinary criminal or the ordinary citizen who gets one of these concealed carry permits might buy? What are the chances of hitting anything with it? The answer is that from twenty or thirty feet away the chances are reasonable, but it gets worse very quickly from there.

In particular, in any sort of a duel at 50 - 100 yards
between a man with a (normal) pistol and a man with a modern compound bow, the man with the pistol is basically dead.

Again, just speaking for myself here,
I find it hard to concieve of a defensive engagement
from criminal depredation at much more than arm 's length.
David
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 12:42 am
Personally, watching this thread descend into absurdity, I really gotta wonder just how much actual practical experience, pistol or long gun, modern high-power center fire or replica black powder, or bow, compound or recurve, some of the more enthusiastic participants in this discussion really have. Much of what's gone on here most recently comes just about to the level of comic book/video game reality.

Now, while knowingly falling into the comic book/video game reality vein, I'll mention that in my actual experience, a Ruger Redhawk will take out a '58 Buick Roadmaster at 100 yards, with factory loads. I will admit, however, the Buick downrange was old and rusty, and was neither moving nor answering fire. Still, I suspect had that not been the case, the results would not have been materially different.

And if you think that's something, you oughtta see what a standard issue M2 .50cal machinegun will to to a 2½ ton truck at 700 yards ... lay a good, accurate 15-20 round burst and you'll get about the same effect-on-target as can be achieved with a 106mm recoiless rifle - though to be fair, neither of those should be considered personal side arms.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 06:12 am
It's okay, timber. You're not the first to believe himself somehow elevated for being studied in the art of killing.

You obviously need as many reasons as you can get to keep looking down your nose at most people.

And it's your loss if you can't see the absurdity in waxing so poetic over how efficiently one can kill.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 06:22 am
Here's something that can add a little extra exitement to your range time. Very Happy

http://www.tannerite.com/
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 06:23 am
snood wrote:
It's okay, timber...

You obviously need as many reasons as you can get to keep looking down your nose at most people.


Isn't that just precious?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 06:31 am
Timber, if you kill a Buick Roadmaster, you gotta eat it. Non of this pussy havin it stuffed for the den.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 06:37 am
cjhsa wrote:
snood wrote:
It's okay, timber...

You obviously need as many reasons as you can get to keep looking down your nose at most people.


Isn't that just precious?


XOXXOO
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 06:56 am
Who would want to kill this?

http://www.motormint.com/ProductImages/fullsize/57BUIC.jpg
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 07:41 am
You have to put yourself back as a kid Intrepid> When I was 5 or 6 I was scared of cars like this. They were menacing, evil looking things to a kid whose imagination went into OD at the slightest whiff of a Snickers (I loved Snickers), and they made em goddam huge back then. See the evil smirk this car wore, a happy yet menacing face. My dad had the Oldsmobile version which, although sporting a "dummed down" look, it still had a face of a deranged Bozo the Clown (I hated clowns also).These cars must be killed.
However, along with my philosophy of "if you kill it, you must eat it",I never went about doing in 56 Buick Roadmasters or Olds 98'slI just kept careful note of their residences and gave them lots of room.

For some reason Chevies and Fords were , in my mind, benign. They were like cows, big dumb and passive. Sure there were hopped up 56 Chevy Hardtops , but they were more like Swiss Cows with earrings. I learned early that certain types of girls preferred the spaciousness of a Chevy without all the early attempts at countour seating and arm rests. By the time I owned a first car, the 56 Chevy was already a classic.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 07:45 am
PS, you could tell that the Roadmaster was a really special Buick because it had "4" Holes in the sides, while all the cheaper ones only had 3.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 08:22 am
snood wrote:
It's okay, timber. You're not the first to believe himself somehow elevated for being studied in the art of killing.

You obviously need as many reasons as you can get to keep looking down your nose at most people.

And it's your loss if you can't see the absurdity in waxing so poetic over how efficiently one can kill.

snood, you really oughtta have somebody take a look at that - seems your problem there is getting worse.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 08:24 am
timberlandko wrote:
snood wrote:
It's okay, timber. You're not the first to believe himself somehow elevated for being studied in the art of killing.

You obviously need as many reasons as you can get to keep looking down your nose at most people.

And it's your loss if you can't see the absurdity in waxing so poetic over how efficiently one can kill.

snood, you really oughtta have somebody take a look at that - seems your problem there is getting worse.


Hmmm.... only if you go in for a look at your delusions of grandeur.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 08:33 am
snood wrote:
timberlandko wrote:
snood wrote:
It's okay, timber. You're not the first to believe himself somehow elevated for being studied in the art of killing.

You obviously need as many reasons as you can get to keep looking down your nose at most people.

And it's your loss if you can't see the absurdity in waxing so poetic over how efficiently one can kill.

snood, you really oughtta have somebody take a look at that - seems your problem there is getting worse.


Hmmm.... only if you go in for a look at your delusions of grandeur.

Sure have captured your fancy, haven't I? Go right ahead and enjoy your puerile stalking game - don't bother me none, and I'm told by some folks they really enjoy watching you foaming at the keyboard
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 09:43 am
Just because I'm in the same thread at the same time doesn't mean anyone's "stalking" you, hero. and there are an equal amout of folks who get kicks at your know it all omniscience.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 09:47 am
snood, what's happening?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 09:49 am
Timber has helped many, many people here at A2K, particularly with his expertise in resolving computer glitches. I believe helping others is what A2K is truly about at the root level, not trash talking.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 09:49 am
That's hardly fair, although i don't expect fairness from Snood. Personally, i like to poke trollish people with a variety of sticks on a variety of topics. The Big Bird, however, carefully chooses the battles in which he is willing to engage. That silliness about "know it all omniscience," apart from being rather naively redundant, is simply not a charge you're going to be able to make stick--the Big Bird is far less active and in far fewer topics, even than Snood--who can't resist the impulse to play pitbull with anyone who has ever criticized the religious. I've seen Snood stalk folks on a regular basis--with Lash being his favorite target.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.23 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 08:33:09