0
   

Did you have a Spiritual Awakening?

 
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:23 pm
cryptic- it's too easy and makes too much sense simply to say - yeah, I got the joke - I was yankin your chain?

I don't get that. You get some satisfaction from appearing mysterious?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:26 pm
It's not mysterious.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:27 pm
Excuse me, tangent -
quoting Lash - Statistics class--over forever--June 29, 2006--the day mathematical-type things disappear from my milieu.




And the rains came down...
tension flooding away.






ok, back to arguing..
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:28 pm
No, not mysterious intentionally. It just struck my fancy to make that observation, because so many people quote it as though they really think it could happen.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:32 pm
Well, gee, edgar (whom I virtually never or maybe possibly once ever disagreed with on some of these matters) some words are very small. Words could happen.
Besides,
I think some monkeys are smartish.

All Ball...
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:33 pm
Laughing Laughing Cool

osso!! Numbers and functions and asymptotes and probabilities are evaporating fom my poor tired haid. I am so blissful.

My world will be a whirling gale of Literature and Creative Writing..... <floats away on a cloud...>
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:33 pm
I see I've posted off course again.


Carry on, nurses.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:36 pm
Lash wrote:
It's not mysterious.


What - frikkin-ever.

Thanks, edgar.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:41 pm
You consider that personal?

"It's not mysterious" is personal toward you? Explain how.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:42 pm
Edgar spoke for himself, and I edited my post. Nevermind, Lash.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 09:52 pm
snood
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:36 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lash wrote:

It's not mysterious.


snood wrote:

Lash, how do you propose you and I (for instance) avoid getting into personal tit-for-tats?
If this is an outcome to be desired (and my understanding was that it was, for you and I), I thought we'd achieve it by directing our comments toward the subject matter of the thread.

It appears to me that the last posts you offered here have had not much other motive but to needle me. Are we still going to avoid getting into that, or are we only going to avoid it when you feel like avoiding it?
____________________________________

For those who didn't see it, the previous copy is the post I responded to.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 10:06 pm
Like I said - nevermind.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 10:17 pm
snood wrote:
Lash wrote:
It's not mysterious.


What - frikkin-ever.



While you're neverminding that, nevermind this.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 10:30 pm
As I see it, a true "spiritual awakening" (e.g., enlightenment) is something the beneficiary would not be aware of. Therefore, I see no point in discussing the topic.
0 Replies
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 10:51 pm
Nature is my religion and I do get what might be called spiritual awakenings at times when I see something so exquisitely beautiful that it takes all my senses and fills them with life and light. With nature though, there is no religion in the punishment sense of the word--heaven or hell--nature isn't moral or demanding to be worshipped, it just is. That is all I need.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jun, 2006 10:55 pm
Very Happy
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jun, 2006 04:49 am
Lash wrote:
snood wrote:
Lash wrote:
It's not mysterious.


What - frikkin-ever.



While you're neverminding that, nevermind this.


You seem to have a point to make in your posts here, Lash. It seems to be something about me. I love to talk about myself as much as the next person, and I'd love to engage you on whatever it is you're trying to say with your posts here - can you state it clearly?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jun, 2006 07:12 am
It's really not that mysterious. I am reading the thread and responding based on my opinion of what I read, or my own experiences.

What part don't you understand?
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jun, 2006 07:45 am
Diane wrote:
Nature is my religion and I do get what might be called spiritual awakenings at times when I see something so exquisitely beautiful that it takes all my senses and fills them with life and light. With nature though, there is no religion in the punishment sense of the word--heaven or hell--nature isn't moral or demanding to be worshipped, it just is. That is all I need.


Me too Smile
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jun, 2006 09:20 am
Diane wrote:
I do get what might be called spiritual awakenings at times when I see something so exquisitely beautiful that it takes all my senses and fills them with life and light.


Oh thank you, Di. I am always happy when I am the occasion of someone being spiritually awakened.

Unfortunately...sometimes it causes me to stop being spiritually awake...or "awake" at all.

Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/20/2025 at 02:44:39