As Robert DeNiro said: You talkin to me? You talkin to me?
I don't need to quote anybody, but, Yes dip. I am talking to you, even though I find it odious. There is a whole crap load of stuff that folks don't understand, but even the dim know that lack of oxygen can cause problems. But thanks anyway, if you have any more pearls of wisdom that have nothing to do with this thread, please dash off a note to Dr. Gott, he could use a good laugh. By the way, don't mix bleach with ammonia, you might pass out and never wake up.
Let me know if you need any more safety tips.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Robert DeNiro said: You talkin to me? You talkin to me?
As I stated before, I'm talking to you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Robert DeNiro said: You talkin to me? You talkin to me?
If I were to describe the President as a half-wit and a moron, and to add that it's a great pity that John Wilkes Booth didn't live today because he shot the wrong President...would anyone find those comments unseemly or unpatriotic or some such?
blatham wrote:If I were to describe the President as a half-wit and a moron, and to add that it's a great pity that John Wilkes Booth didn't live today because he shot the wrong President...would anyone find those comments unseemly or unpatriotic or some such?
No, but somebody might direct the Secret Service to your unassuming shop for a sit-down. Chafee's not the prez.
-----
But on a related note:
President Bush assassinated in new TV docudrama
There is little doubt that Coulter is a plagairist. The following shows that she is a flat-out liar regarding the media and the Democrats.
Wed, Aug 30, 2006 5:29pm EST
Send to a friend Print Version
Coulter: Terrorists killed in Iraq are "described in the media as 'Iraqi civilians' "
In her August 23 column, right-wing pundit Ann Coulter claimed that "terrorists" in Iraq who are killed by the U.S. military are "described in the media as 'Iraqi civilians,' even if they are from Jordan, like the now-dead leader of al-Qaida in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi." In its most recent Human Rights Report, the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq found that 5,818 Iraqi civilians were killed between May 1 and June 30; the report added that "[w]omen, children and vulnerable groups, such as minorities, internally displaced and disabled persons continue to be directly affected by the violence."
Coulter did not provide any example of a media report that described Zarqawi as a "civilian."
As Media Matters for America noted, Coulter's August 23 column also repeated the false claims that Democrats "oppose the National Security Agency listening to people who are calling specific phone numbers found on al-Qaida cell phones and computers" and "oppose the Patriot Act."
From Coulter's August 23 column:
This year's Democratic plan for the future is another inane sound bite designed to trick American voters into trusting them with national security.
To wit, they're claiming there is no connection between the war on terror and the war in Iraq, and while they're all for the war against terror -- absolutely in favor of that war -- they are adamantly opposed to the Iraq war. You know, the war where the U.S. military is killing thousands upon thousands of terrorists (described in the media as "Iraqi civilians," even if they are from Jordan, like the now-dead leader of al-Qaida in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi). That war.
--Mediamatters.com
Ticomaya wrote:blatham wrote:If I were to describe the President as a half-wit and a moron, and to add that it's a great pity that John Wilkes Booth didn't live today because he shot the wrong President...would anyone find those comments unseemly or unpatriotic or some such?
No, but somebody might direct the Secret Service to your unassuming shop for a sit-down. Chafee's not the prez.
Up to date on the lady's collumn, I see. I wondered who would be. True, Chafee is not the president, though how that might be relevant here isn't apparent.
blatham wrote:If I were to describe the President as a half-wit and a moron, and to add that it's a great pity that John Wilkes Booth didn't live today because he shot the wrong President...would anyone find those comments unseemly or unpatriotic or some such?
You would be OK with the half wit and moron part, even Joe Scarborough devoted a segment on MSNBC titled "Is Bush an Idiot", and he lamented the fact that Bush is not intellectually curious. Joe is not some leftist, he held office in Florida as a Republican.
However, since we are still a country with voting privileges, if we decide to actually vote, folks like Bush will either remain or be replaced by the outcome of elections. I don't want elected officials shot in order to make a point because the point being made is that democracy is in trouble.
Saves time and trouble for everyone, Red.
Welcome to A2k
Cycloptichorn
blatham wrote:Ticomaya wrote:blatham wrote:If I were to describe the President as a half-wit and a moron, and to add that it's a great pity that John Wilkes Booth didn't live today because he shot the wrong President...would anyone find those comments unseemly or unpatriotic or some such?
No, but somebody might direct the Secret Service to your unassuming shop for a sit-down. Chafee's not the prez.
Up to date on the lady's collumn, I see. I wondered who would be. True, Chafee is not the president, though how that might be relevant here isn't apparent.
I'm confident it's at least as relevant as the question I was responding to.
blatham wrote:glitterbag wrote:blatham wrote:glitterbag wrote:As I stated before, I'm talking to you.
Don't.
Point taken.
Thanks.
You do know that I wasn't addressing you, things get confused here fro time to time but I wasn't getting in your face, it was somebody else's face.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brain Damage Is Linked to Heart Failure
Scans show problems with vital areas that control heart functions, study says
By Ed Edelson
HealthDay Reporter
MONDAY, Aug. 22 (HealthDay News) -- Heart failure, the organ's inability to pump blood properly, is as much a matter of the brain as the heart, a new study suggests.
The research, which describes the brain damage seen in people with heart failure, was done by Ronald L. Harper, distinguished professor of neurobiology at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Mary A. Woo, an associate professor of nursing at UCLA.
"We got together to do imaging studies," Harper said. "Our first paper in 2003 showed that heart-failure patients have a great deal of brain injury -- tissue loss in the regions of the brain that control blood pressure and heart rate."
BernardR wrote:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brain Damage Is Linked to Heart Failure
Scans show problems with vital areas that control heart functions, study says
By Ed Edelson
HealthDay Reporter
MONDAY, Aug. 22 (HealthDay News) -- Heart failure, the organ's inability to pump blood properly, is as much a matter of the brain as the heart, a new study suggests.
The research, which describes the brain damage seen in people with heart failure, was done by Ronald L. Harper, distinguished professor of neurobiology at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Mary A. Woo, an associate professor of nursing at UCLA.
"We got together to do imaging studies," Harper said. "Our first paper in 2003 showed that heart-failure patients have a great deal of brain injury -- tissue loss in the regions of the brain that control blood pressure and heart rate."
Duh........how many times are you going to post this old information, chic?
One of the provisions of the Patriot Act
