0
   

Ann Coulter Attacks 9/11 Widows

 
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 04:40 pm
blatham wrote:
You'll want to check out this video up top... poor Ann. Imagine, someone speaking over her...interrupting her...it is so unkind...so liberal.

http://daoureport.salon.com/



Unbelievable, I haven't watched Fox news in a couple of years, maybe I should start with this Kristen Powers on there. Is she normally that good?

(I couldn't make out the one on C&L too well but I watched it here
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 04:44 pm
Oh my God. Bear got the virus......is there a doctor in the house, we need Henny Youngman vaccine stat.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 07:09 pm
revel wrote:
blatham wrote:
You'll want to check out this video up top... poor Ann. Imagine, someone speaking over her...interrupting her...it is so unkind...so liberal.

http://daoureport.salon.com/



Unbelievable, I haven't watched Fox news in a couple of years, maybe I should start with this Kristen Powers on there. Is she normally that good?

(I couldn't make out the one on C&L too well but I watched it here


This is the funniest bit of news I've seen in a long long time. Hilarious and encouraging. Finally, the bitch meets her match. How did this happen? Where were the guard dogs at Fox? Yippee!

"Things are going swimmingly in Afganistan." Amazing. Bold faced stupidity. Laughable..........and she got a good laugh from the other participants. Where was Hannity? Did he go to the John?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 07:21 pm
I have a clip floating around somewhere of Colmes beating up on her a few weeks back. I'll see if I can't find it.

aha

http://movies.crooksandliars.com/ColmesCoulterLiar.wmv

maybe here

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/02/28.html#a1740

Quote:
Colmes asks for her condemnation of a quote from a Republican who likened Dean to an Al Qaeda brand terrorist.

Coulter, after initially dodging the question altogether, in pure wing nut fashion responds, "I refuse to respond to your characterization of the facts because you lie." (Nevermind that it's a FRIGGIN' QUOTE!!)

- DEAD SILENCE -

Furious, Colmes cranes his head in a fashion I've never seen and asks, "ARE YOU CALLING ME A LIAR?"

Coulter: (quivering laughter) Come on, you can't be serious.

Colmes: (Stares intently, looking DEAD serious)

I have never seen someone stop Coulter in her tracks so effectively. She glances toward Hannity for support, he remains silent. Coulter whithers into dust and proves, once again, just how hypocritical, how absolutely spinelessly hypocritical the Right has become.


Funny stuff

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 07:44 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
I have a clip floating around somewhere of Colmes beating up on her a few weeks back. I'll see if I can't find it.

aha

http://movies.crooksandliars.com/ColmesCoulterLiar.wmv

maybe here

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/02/28.html#a1740

Quote:
Colmes asks for her condemnation of a quote from a Republican who likened Dean to an Al Qaeda brand terrorist.

Coulter, after initially dodging the question altogether, in pure wing nut fashion responds, "I refuse to respond to your characterization of the facts because you lie." (Nevermind that it's a FRIGGIN' QUOTE!!)

- DEAD SILENCE -

Furious, Colmes cranes his head in a fashion I've never seen and asks, "ARE YOU CALLING ME A LIAR?"

Coulter: (quivering laughter) Come on, you can't be serious.

Colmes: (Stares intently, looking DEAD serious)

I have never seen someone stop Coulter in her tracks so effectively. She glances toward Hannity for support, he remains silent. Coulter whithers into dust and proves, once again, just how hypocritical, how absolutely spinelessly hypocritical the Right has become.


Funny stuff

Cycloptichorn


wow, what a bad summary of that interview. Did you bother watching the video? Anne holds herself up quite well, as is expected.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 07:51 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
I have a clip floating around somewhere of Colmes beating up on her a few weeks back. I'll see if I can't find it.

aha

http://movies.crooksandliars.com/ColmesCoulterLiar.wmv

maybe here

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/02/28.html#a1740

Quote:
Colmes asks for her condemnation of a quote from a Republican who likened Dean to an Al Qaeda brand terrorist.

Coulter, after initially dodging the question altogether, in pure wing nut fashion responds, "I refuse to respond to your characterization of the facts because you lie." (Nevermind that it's a FRIGGIN' QUOTE!!)

- DEAD SILENCE -

Furious, Colmes cranes his head in a fashion I've never seen and asks, "ARE YOU CALLING ME A LIAR?"

Coulter: (quivering laughter) Come on, you can't be serious.

Colmes: (Stares intently, looking DEAD serious)

I have never seen someone stop Coulter in her tracks so effectively. She glances toward Hannity for support, he remains silent. Coulter whithers into dust and proves, once again, just how hypocritical, how absolutely spinelessly hypocritical the Right has become.


Funny stuff

Cycloptichorn


wow, what a bad summary of that interview. Did you bother watching the video? Anne holds herself up quite well, as is expected.


Absolutely amazing, McG that you can cling to this perspective. Not only is she half baked and just plain silly, but she also looks like paranoid giraffe with darting eyes. However, no one can help how they look. I wouldn't even notice if she weren't so unbelievably deluded.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 08:07 pm
My bias is better then yours. Razz
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 08:40 pm
So sez you................. Laughing
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 08:54 pm
revel wrote:
blatham wrote:
You'll want to check out this video up top... poor Ann. Imagine, someone speaking over her...interrupting her...it is so unkind...so liberal.

http://daoureport.salon.com/



Unbelievable, I haven't watched Fox news in a couple of years, maybe I should start with this Kristen Powers on there. Is she normally that good?

(I couldn't make out the one on C&L too well but I watched it here


It seems she was a replacement for combes (sp?). I'm not very familiar with the fox crowd, though I try to get a taste most days of what O'Reilly is up to. I found the link to that video from Alterman's column, I think.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 09:12 pm
sp - Alan Colmes

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 08:54 am
blatham wrote:
revel wrote:
blatham wrote:
You'll want to check out this video up top... poor Ann. Imagine, someone speaking over her...interrupting her...it is so unkind...so liberal.

http://daoureport.salon.com/



Unbelievable, I haven't watched Fox news in a couple of years, maybe I should start with this Kristen Powers on there. Is she normally that good?

(I couldn't make out the one on C&L too well but I watched it here


It seems she was a replacement for combes (sp?). I'm not very familiar with the fox crowd, though I try to get a taste most days of what O'Reilly is up to. I found the link to that video from Alterman's column, I think.


So she was just a replacement. Think I'll stick to various web sites who watch fox so I don't have to. I'm glad that I had a chance to see that clip though.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 09:32 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
sp - Alan Colmes

Cycloptichorn


tah.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 10:05 am
Quote:
So she was just a replacement. Think I'll stick to various web sites who watch fox so I don't have to. I'm glad that I had a chance to see that clip though.


Olberman on msnbc ran the clip last evening.

She's really a despicable individual. Her techniques have their corollary in Joe McCarthy and Joe Goebbels. And, of course, in the Amsterdam redlight whores sitting, legs descended, in their windows.

But it's interesting to watch what she does.

First, disregard facts ("Afghanistan is going swimingly"). As her goals are entirely and extremely partisan, she can't acknowledge any fact which might work against such partisan goals.

Second, disruption through over-talking or changing subject. An orderly and clear discussion moving logically must be thwarted whenever it gets near a fact or logical conclusion which might jeopardize the propaganda point she's pushing.

Third, use of logical fallacies, most obviously the ad hominem. This too works in the service of disruption.

Four, always attack and do it loudly. The effect is to disrupt and intimidate.

Five, never back down on any significant point. Utilize any means available to achieve this. This one and the previous two points are the main tricks that bullies attempt. If she was to honestly answer a question as to why she has this policy of never backing down, I suspect she would answer that it would be a sign of weakness and once you demonstrated any weakness, then you open yourself up for sustained attack. Of course, this heads in the opposite direction of discovering or forwarding truth. One wouldn't want to have an MD whose fundamental intellectual process involved never admitting his medical ideas had error.

Six, never allow yourself to be seen as "losing face". Much of the above relates to this goal, and so does her constant "laughing" and "lightheartedness" and hair swishiing. "I remain unmarked, unbruised, unbeaten. I am too mercurial" is the intended suggestion. Just Wonders used to imitate this trick here with the ubiquitous "LOL" in her posts.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 11:49 am
Ticomaya wrote:
Interesting that her/his first post at this site was a reply to Glitterbag concerning acid reflux.

Then 11 posts later she discovers "what the cat drug up here."

Drama queen indeed.



Tico, I missed the remark about acid reflux....I remember (at least I think I did this) asking A2K folks if they ever had to have the surgery to correct the hiatal hernia which sometimes causes reflux. After that, my remarks showed up on SB but not by KAK, it was someone else who is a moderator and has rewritten my questions or responses from time to time to suit himself. I had to complain to Kevin to get that to stop. So, my apologies to KAK, I don't think dramaqueen is KAK. But I have a much better idea who it really is now.

I don't want anyone to deviate from the tread about this stuff between drama and me. Please don't waste anymore time, I don't care what DQueen has to say or allege. But I do thank everyone for the support. GB
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 01:43 pm
Olbermann gave his "Worst Person[s] Award" to the operators of the San Francisco zoo who named their petting-zoo horse "Coulter." He said this is a slander against the horse.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200608250005
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 01:45 pm
Ann Coulter meets her match, and on Fox no less.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/25/coulter-ends-segment/


This is fun to watch.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2006 08:58 am
blatham -- I enjoyed your Saturday morning post about the speaking/debating techniques of the right. It sounded like a description of the way my former husband handles himself! I always said his main problem was having been born into a Republican family!
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2006 10:29 am
blatham wrote:
Quote:
So she was just a replacement. Think I'll stick to various web sites who watch fox so I don't have to. I'm glad that I had a chance to see that clip though.


Olberman on msnbc ran the clip last evening.

She's really a despicable individual. Her techniques have their corollary in Joe McCarthy and Joe Goebbels. And, of course, in the Amsterdam redlight whores sitting, legs descended, in their windows.


You hate her, don't you Bernie? Why don't you refer to her Adam's Apple, or say something about her resembling a horse, or something, like so many of the rest of her leftist critics?

Quote:
But it's interesting to watch what she does.

First, disregard facts ("Afghanistan is going swimingly"). As her goals are entirely and extremely partisan, she can't acknowledge any fact which might work against such partisan goals.


As opposed to leftists, who are competely open to the possibility that they might be wrong?

Quote:
Second, disruption through over-talking or changing subject. An orderly and clear discussion moving logically must be thwarted whenever it gets near a fact or logical conclusion which might jeopardize the propaganda point she's pushing.


Absolutely hilarious that you say this. If you watch the clip again, you will note that the persons talking over her are the leftists on the panel. She couldn't get a word in edge-wise, which is why she reacted the way she did.

Quote:
Third, use of logical fallacies, most obviously the ad hominem. This too works in the service of disruption.


You mean like referring to people as "Amsterdam redlight whores sitting, legs descended, in their windows"? Is that kind of ad hominem you are complaining of?

Quote:
Four, always attack and do it loudly. The effect is to disrupt and intimidate.


Again, the only effort at loud intimidation on the clip in question was made by the leftists, of whom it's clear you have no complaint.

The most amusing thing about this is your continued hypocrisy, blatham. You are completely oblivious, one must assume, to the fact that you are so often guilty of what you criticize others for.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2006 11:37 am
Quote:
Again, the only effort at loud intimidation on the clip in question was made by the leftists, of whom it's clear you have no complaint.




Quote:
This is a partial transcript from "Hannity & Colmes," August 24, 2006, that has been edited for clarity.

KIRSTEN POWERS, GUEST HOST: There are just 75 days left until Americans elect a new House and a new Senate. According to the latest FOX News poll, likely voters consider Iraq the most important issue for the midterm elections. So will the first Tuesday in November be a referendum on the war in Iraq? And what will be the result?

Joining us now is author of "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," Ann Coulter, and Democratic strategist Michael Brown.

Thanks for being with us.

Ann, so why don't you give us your predictions on what's going to happen in the midterm elections?

ANN COULTER, CONSERVATIVE AUTHOR: I don't know.

POWERS: What do you think is going to be the biggest issue?

COULTER: Unlike Morris, I don't like to give predictions. No, it absolutely should be in Iraq. It should be the war on terrorism, not just Iraq. That is part of the war on terrorism.

But no, of course, I mean, we have billions of angry fanatics who want to destroy America, slit our throats, you know, kidnap Americans, blow up planes. Of course that is the most important issue. And, I mean, the fact that Democrats aren't very good on the national security issue, I think, is indicated by the fact that they consider it unfair to talk about national security.

POWERS: Michael, so if Iraq is going to be the central issue, as Ann says, it looks like Democrats are probably going to be picking up a lot of seats, don't you think?

MICHAEL BROWN, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: Yes, I do think. I know Ann doesn't want to make a prediction. She can't, because her forecast don't look too good. But for Democrats, it clearly looks wonderful.

I mean, frankly it wasn't just the Iraqi poll number. You just look at those top three issues, the economy and gas prices, all have to do with the failed policy in the Middle East. And it clearly is a correlation between it.

So, yes, obviously Democrats are very optimistic, but 75 days is a long time. We've got a lot of work to do. We can't take anything for granted. Clearly, we see an opening. But these policies have just failed, they're just wrong, and they're going to pay the price in November.

POWERS: Well, the other issue really is that now we're seeing in the poll that came out yesterday, The New York Times/CBS poll, that Americans are saying they don't think that there's a link between terrorism and Iraq. And, Ann, I suspect that you don't agree with that.

But how do you think Republicans are going to deal with that? It seems like Americans are starting to question that.

COULTER: Right. I think by asking the question I ask in the title of my column today, what part of the war on terrorism do they support? This idea that Iraq is distracting from the war on terrorism is really the oddest thing I've ever heard, but that has clearly been the talking point from the media and the Democrats for a while.

It would be more credible if the Democratic Party supported any other part of the war on terrorism. But, no, they're against the Patriot Act. They want to shut down Guantanamo. They're against the NSA listening to phone calls from people calling numbers found on Al Qaeda computers. They're against profiling at airports. I mean, what part of fighting terrorism do they support, other than, you know, denouncing Wal-Mart?

HANNITY: That's a good line, Ann.

Let me go to Michael Brown. Michael, I want to ask you two yes or no questions. Yes, do you agree with Howard Dean, the leader of your party, that Ned Lamont is the future of your party? Do you agree with that statement, yes or no?

BROWN: Well, clearly, as...

HANNITY: Yes or no?

BROWN: Yes, I know you...

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: Question two. Here we go. I want to know if you agree with John Murtha, the No. 1 campaigner now for the Democratic Party, your guy. John Murtha said that instead of deterring terrorism, American policies are fostering it. Do you agree with that, yes or no?

BROWN: Absolutely yes. And, frankly, for the end of Ann's question that she had, clearly the Republicans in the Bush administration have not been able to sell that the Iraqi war is connected with the War on Terror.

HANNITY: Wait a minute. Let's get to the...

BROWN: The American people are speaking, and they're going to speak in November.

HANNITY: You are saying ?- wait a minute. Let's put emphasis on this.

BROWN: I said absolutely yes.

HANNITY: You are telling America tonight that America...

BROWN: You don't have to repeat the question. I said, "Absolutely yes."

HANNITY: ... is causing terrorism. That's what it said.

BROWN: Not America. Not America. The Bush policies. The Republican Bush policies, not America.

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: So did we cause what happened in Spain and Bali? Did we cause what happened in Russia? Did we cause the first Trade Center attack? Did we cause the embassy bombings? Did we cause the Khobar towers?

BROWN: No, no, clearly everything is not done in a vacuum. You can go back in time all that we want. We can go back to the Reagan administration, too. The question is: What's happening today in the world, and what have our policies done to foster that hatred towards our country?

HANNITY: You know something, Ann Coulter...

BROWN: There are more countries now that hate the United States than ever before in the history of our...

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: Go ahead. You blame America. This is...

BROWN: I'm not blaming America. I'm blaming the Bush policies and what they have done to this government.

HANNITY: You are saying that we ?- our policies foster ?- Ann Coulter, this is the problem. The party that's weak on national defense...

BROWN: We're not weak. We're weak because we disagree with the policies?

HANNITY: ... excuse me Michael, Michael, wait a minute. Ann Coulter, the party that's weak on national defense, that doesn't want the Patriot Act, the NSA program, the data mining program, that wants to confer rights on enemy combatants, the party that's always been weak on defense...

BROWN: Sean, that's just wrong. It's not...

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: ... now blames America for the series of attacks that's taken place around the world. That should be the issue of this campaign.

COULTER: And that list illustrates that Michael really does have a point. Yes, the terrorists are mad at us, and they'd be much happier with the policies of the Democrats. Yes, that's true. If you want to make the terrorists like us...

(CROSSTALK)

BROWN: The policies haven't worked.

POWERS: We have to cut out for a second, you guys. We'll be right back.

BROWN: It hasn't worked.

POWERS: We'll have more with Ann and Michael after the break.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

HANNITY: As we continue on "Hannity & Colmes," we continue now with our guests, author of the No. 1 New York Times best seller "Godless," of course, that's Ann Coulter, and Democratic strategist Michael Brown.

All right, Michael, here's where we stand with your party. When the Patriot Act was killed by the Democrats, Harry Reid bragged, "We killed the Patriot Act." We know that you're against the NSA data mining. We know that you're against the NSA surveillance program.

So the question is: Where does the Democratic Party ?- what will you do if you're elected to power to make our country safer in the War on Terror? Specifically what do you ?- what will your party support?

BROWN: Well, first of all, specifically, I have to correct some of the facts that you have a little wrong. We are in favor of some pieces of the litany of the list that you just mentioned. It's not that we disagree with it, but certain things about these particular bills you send up we don't agree with. And so you try to pin us...

HANNITY: You voted to kill the Patriot Act. You're against data mining, and you're against surveillance. So what does the Democratic Party stand for to make the country safer? I ask you again.

BROWN: First of all, I wanted to correct your facts, because your facts weren't accurate.

HANNITY: All right, you voted to kill the Patriot Act...

(CROSSTALK)

BROWN: But now I will answer...

HANNITY: You're against surveillance, and you're against data mining.

BROWN: But now I will answer ?- pieces of that.

HANNITY: Where does your party stand?

BROWN: Second of all, I will answer your question. The party stands on where this administration ?- let's go back to the year 2000.

HANNITY: Specifically. Give me a specific, Michael.

BROWN: I'm going to give you specifics, Sean, but I have to give you some backdrop to it. The Bush administration, during their election campaign...

HANNITY: You're talking about Bush.

BROWN: ... said they were going to ?- Bush said they were going to...

HANNITY: What does that have to do with what you will stand ?- where do you stand?

BROWN: Because I'm talking about what they ran on in the year 2000.

HANNITY: What will you do if elected? I don't care about Bush.

BROWN: They ran on putting...

(CROSSTALK)

BROWN: ... together the best foreign policy team in this country's history.

HANNITY: And what will you do, specifically? Tell America tonight.

BROWN: And all it's done ?- what Democrats will do which is different is engage with people and talk to people.

HANNITY: Michael, you'll engage with people? Wow.

BROWN: And keep people at the table and have some dialogue. You have to do diplomacy...

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: You'll engage with people. That's your answer? You'll engage with people. Amazing.

BROWN: War should be the last resort. Conflicts should be the last resort. The Bush policies haven't worked, Sean.

HANNITY: We'll talk to Usama bin Laden, that's what we'll do.

BROWN: The American people are speaking, and you don't want to listen. It's almost like you disagree with the American people.

POWERS: Ann, let's talk about Usama bin Laden. How about let's kill Usama bin Laden? How about let's find Usama bin Laden? You're talking about how, you know, Democrats don't want to do things on terrorism, which I actually will in a second go ahead and list the things they want to do, but how about the fact we invaded Iraq, when, you know, over in Afghanistan everything was falling apart? And the fact that we let Usama bin Laden get away, and the president said he doesn't even think about him, he doesn't care about him.

BROWN: What happened to "mission accomplished"?

POWERS: What about that?

COULTER: I look forward to hearing that list.

POWERS: OK, you will in a second.

COULTER: But as for catching Usama, it's irrelevant. Things are going swimmingly in Afghanistan.

POWERS: No, they're not.

COULTER: I mean, it's like a fading movie star now.

BROWN: "Swimmingly"?

POWERS: Things in Afghanistan are going horribly. But this is interesting, Usama bin Laden is irrelevant. The person, the mastermind behind the Al Qaeda attacks on the United States is completely irrelevant. Is that what you're saying?

COULTER: Right, it was handed to Bill Clinton twice.

POWERS: Oh, it's Bill Clinton's fault.

COULTER: And Bill Clinton said no...

POWERS: Yes, because I think that actually George Bush was president in 2001.

COULTER: I know you're trying to imitate Alan Colmes, but at some point he does let me answer.

POWERS: Yes, OK. Let's go ?- Michael, why don't we talk about the things that the...

COULTER: OK, well, good night! It was nice being here.

(CROSSTALK)

POWERS: ... Democrats actually arguing about the fact that all of the...

COULTER: Sean?

POWERS: ... Republicans have voted against all the things the...

COULTER: I think I can leave.

POWERS: ... Democrats have brought up, like increasing funding for border security, increasing funding for port security...

COULTER: I think I can leave now.

POWERS: ... increasing funding for airline security. I mean, isn't that true, Michael?

HANNITY: Hang on, Ann.

BROWN: Real homeland security starts at home. And as long as the Republicans continue to cut the budget relative to homeland security, these kind of things are going to continue. You're exactly right with your question. Remember, all of these things are getting cut and slashed to be able to pay for the Iraqi war. We're forgetting about the War on Terror.

And let's keep in mind the War on Terror is just not just a foreign war. We have homeland folks here that want to cause our government harm, too. We have to watch out for the Timothy McVeighs of the world, as well as folks in different parts of the world. So let's keep that in mind. This is not one kind of person we're fighting against.

HANNITY: We've got to run.


source

video

Now what were you saying about the only loud voice on there? Maybe the leftist are just finally learning to fight fire with fire, about time in my opinion as long as what they say is correct, unlike the loud voices of the far right.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2006 12:42 pm
Here is a montage of Coultergeist video from that day and an earlier interview with Brenda Buttner, an outrageously biased one in which Buttner astoundly sets up Coultergeist:

Quote:

BUTTNER: Well, you do a great job in your editorial of -- kind of listing it all out, and when you do, it's very interesting to see -- they're really good at saying what they're against, aren't they?


From media matters:

Quote:
Your World guest host Brenda Buttner invited Coulter to discuss her "great job" of bashing Dems; later on Fox, Coulter bristled over more challenging questions
Summary: On Your World, discussing her latest column, Ann Coulter repeated numerous false claims to assert that Democrats do not support the Bush administration's fight against terrorism. However, hours later on Hannity & Colmes, when she was challenged on her claim that Osama bin Laden "was handed to Bill Clinton twice," Coulter abruptly cut short her appearance on the show.
While interviewing right-wing pundit Ann Coulter on the August 24 edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto, guest host and Fox News senior business correspondent Brenda Buttner invited Coulter to elaborate on the "great job" she had done, in her most recent column, of bashing Democrats for not supporting the Bush administration's fight against terrorism. Later that day, in stark contrast to her interview on Your World, Coulter abruptly cut short her appearance on the August 24 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes after Democratic strategist and Fox News political analyst Kirsten Powers, who was guest co-host, challenged Coulter's false assertion that former President Bill Clinton turned down the opportunity to capture Osama bin Laden.

In her August 23 column -- "What Part of the War on Terrorism Do They Support?" -- Coulter repeated the false claims that Democrats "oppose the National Security Agency listening to people who are calling specific phone numbers found on al-Qaida cell phones and computers" and "oppose the Patriot Act." Introducing Coulter on Your World, Buttner stated: "You do a great job in your editorial of ... listing it all out, and when you do, it's very interesting to see -- they're really good at saying what they're against, aren't they?" Buttner later appeared to concur with Coulter's false assertion that Democrats are "against every part of the war on terror," saying: "You've said it well. The problem is that the [Bush] administration doesn't always go out there and sell this. It doesn't always go out there and say, 'What are the Democrats for in this war on terror?' " Buttner then asked Coulter: "Do you think the getting out there and selling themselves and fighting against the Democrats -- that finally we're going to get the Republicans out there to fight?"

However, as the weblogs Think Progress and Crooks and Liars noted, hours later on Hannity & Colmes, Coulter found it difficult to participate in a discussion of the Democrats' position on terrorism when challenged. Coulter asserted that things are going "swimmingly" in Afghanistan, even though a British military commander said the situation in Afghanistan is "close to anarchy," as Think Progress noted. When Powers later challenged Coulter's claim that bin Laden "was handed to Bill Clinton twice," a claim Media Matters for America has previously debunked, Coulter unexpectedly ended her participation in the segment.




Transcript of Buttner interview available at media matters linked above.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/06/2026 at 09:28:44