Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:42 am
neologist wrote:
Just because Rex sometimes seems to be bailing with a sieve does not mean the boat is not filling with water.


Pure horsie poop . . . but that last line, that's an hilarious zinger . . .
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:45 am
neologist wrote:
Actually Rex is right about Jehovah and Jesus not being one and the same. And his is correct in saying Satan is the god of this world.

There are many in the bible called gods. Some even worship their bellies.

Just because Rex sometimes seems to be bailing with a sieve does not mean the boat is not filling with water.


I am convinced in the perfection of the word of God.

We have everything to gain and nothing to lose.

I am going down with the ship... :wink:
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:47 am
Check the air in your water wings, Set.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:49 am
Naw, i went to the lake with the dogs early today . . . you know, mid-day sun, mad dogs and Englishmen . . . all that . . .
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:50 am
Setanta wrote:
neologist wrote:
Just because Rex sometimes seems to be bailing with a sieve does not mean the boat is not filling with water.


Pure horsie poop . . . but that last line, that's an hilarious zinger . . .


Set, your camel dung view of the Bible, I am sure has more holes than a sieve. Two can play toss the insults meant to draw attention away from the necessary time needed to comprehend my post.

Set immediately responded showing he did not STUDY my post.

Jas 1:19
Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath:
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:52 am
timberlandko wrote:
snood wrote:
Yeah, belief/psychosis....same thing....


wotta piece'a work

Straw man there, snood - typing very slowly here ... do try to follow along;

Some religionists - notably but not exclusively religionists of fundamentalist persuasion, Christian and otherwise - express their apologetics in such manner as to display their particular religious belief set as fully meeting the qualifications of delusional psychosis. Not all, but many - and those many are well represented here. If it walks like a duck ...


You call it a strawman, then you go on to substantiate what I was saying - that to you, those who hold strong beliefs in deities (religionists)and those who are afflicted with psychosis are about indistinguishable.

You are so arrogant you are almost a caricature. And a piece'a work.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:55 am
You're right, Rex, i did not study your post . . .

I have no interest in "studying" the hilariously confused drivel you post here. You are to only person to whom you make sense. Don't blame the rest of us for an unwillingness to dive into the cess pools of incoherence with which you typically regale us.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:58 am
Snood, that's a lie on your part. That is not what the Big Bird said--he very specifically qualified his remarks.

But i'm not surprised to see you pit bull behavior toward someone who levels any criticism at all against any religionist.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 10:59 am
Setanta wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Setanta wrote:
RexRed wrote:
If you want to converse intelligently with me please start reading and studying my posts.
I have taught this TWO GOD thing several times here on A2K


Ah, the stench of arrogant hubris . . . why should anyone consent to be "taught" anything by you, especially in view of the nonsensical character of your babbling?


Another one who apparently does not STUDY my posts...

I had to STUDY the words of my teachers until I understood them... SO DO YOU.


NO I DON'T.

You are not my teacher--i'd commit myself to a maison des alienés before i'd consent to being taught anything by so severely confused an individual as you.


I would prefer not to teach your lousy indignant attitude anyway.

I am not your door mat either.

When your mind is closed you are UNTEACHABLE.

You have much to learn...
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:08 am
Setanta wrote:
You're right, Rex, i did not study your post . . .

I have no interest in "studying" the hilariously confused drivel you post here. You are to only person to whom you make sense. Don't blame the rest of us for an unwillingness to dive into the cess pools of incoherence with which you typically regale us.


Your loss Set, not mine.

Prove me wrong?

You haven't got the intellectual power to read and understand my post it is over your pea brained head. Let alone the smarts to debate me.

I WILL CHALLENGE YOU ANY DAY TO A DEBATE ON THE BIBLE. We will see who is the teacher!

When you can't PROVE me wrong BIBLICALLY you resort to childish insult. This just tells me, I WIN, YOU LOSE!

Is my logic too much for your innate insanity Set? Reconsider that asylum...
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:08 am
I don't have lice, so i'm not lousy.

I find you hilarous rather than an offense to my dignity, so i am not indignant (although, of course, if you had the power to see yourself as others see you, you might offend your own dignity).

Of the much that everyone undoubtedly has to learn, there is nothing which you are able to teach.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:18 am
Setanta wrote:
Snood, that's a lie on your part. That is not what the Big Bird said--he very specifically qualified his remarks.

But i'm not surprised to see you pit bull behavior toward someone who levels any criticism at all against any religionist.


You haven't leveled criticism Set, you have leveled insult.

Criticism would be quoting a scripture that contradicts DIRECTLY what I have proposed...

You have resorted to horsie poop insults rather than well educated and constructive criticism.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:20 am
Setanta wrote:
I don't have lice, so i'm not lousy.

I find you hilarous rather than an offense to my dignity, so i am not indignant (although, of course, if you had the power to see yourself as others see you, you might offend your own dignity).

Of the much that everyone undoubtedly has to learn, there is nothing which you are able to teach.


You are unable to learn...
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:22 am
You're just behaving like a spoiled child who has been denied his wishes . . . you have no basis upon which reasonably to make such a judgment.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:24 am
Setanta wrote:
You're just behaving like a spoiled child who has been denied his wishes . . . you have no basis upon which reasonably to make such a judgment.


The word of God is my "basis"... (maybe you do listen)

Jer 2:13 For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:24 am
RexRed wrote:
Setanta wrote:
Snood, that's a lie on your part. That is not what the Big Bird said--he very specifically qualified his remarks.

But i'm not surprised to see you pit bull behavior toward someone who levels any criticism at all against any religionist.


You haven't leveled criticism Set, you have leveled insult.

Criticism would be quoting a scripture that contradicts DIRECTLY what I have proposed...

You have resorted to horsie poop insults rather than well educated and constructive criticism.


As usual, you can't even follow the thread of the conversation. Snood was objecting to what the Big Bird had written, not what i had written.

While we're at it though, spewing "scripture" is not evidence of education. Parrots can be taught to say the same things over and over again . . .
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:27 am
Setanta wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Setanta wrote:
Snood, that's a lie on your part. That is not what the Big Bird said--he very specifically qualified his remarks.

But i'm not surprised to see you pit bull behavior toward someone who levels any criticism at all against any religionist.


You haven't leveled criticism Set, you have leveled insult.

Criticism would be quoting a scripture that contradicts DIRECTLY what I have proposed...

You have resorted to horsie poop insults rather than well educated and constructive criticism.


As usual, you can't even follow the thread of the conversation. Snood was objecting to what the Big Bird had written, not what i had written.

While we're at it though, spewing "scripture" is not evidence of education. Parrots can be taught to say the same things over and ove again . . .


I did not just parrot the scriptures I REASONED them and you parroted insults back...
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:29 am
RexRed wrote:
Setanta wrote:
You're just behaving like a spoiled child who has been denied his wishes . . . you have no basis upon which reasonably to make such a judgment.


The word of God is my "basis"... (maybe you do listen)

Jer 2:13 For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.


You continue to puke scripture--it proves nothing. Of course, you have succeeded in destroying the thread. You've turned it from a discussion of "Bible v. Science" into a pulpit which all about you and your silly theology.

You're an egomaniac on top of being an inventor of peerless nonsense.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:29 am
Setanta wrote:
RexRed wrote:
If you want to converse intelligently with me please start reading and studying my posts.
I have taught this TWO GOD thing several times here on A2K


Ah, the stench of arrogant hubris . . . why should anyone consent to be "taught" anything by you, especially in view of the nonsensical character of your babbling?


This was your intelligent BIBLICAL response that you used to disprove my reasoning...
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Jul, 2006 11:31 am
To disprove "reasoning," some reasoning needs to have taken place to begin with--and that is never the case with the drivel you puke all over a thread.

I have not and never will assert that anything can be proven by "biblical" means, other than the idiocy of those who believe it so. It is an absurdity to suggest that i would attempt to prove anything from a biblical source, other than that it is nonsense.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bible vs. Science
  3. » Page 51
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/12/2025 at 09:41:37