Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 01:49 pm
Lightwizard,

If you don't understand the transition of the Old Testament (Mosaic laws) to the New Testament (Covenant of Grace) then I would imagine that would be your perspective of it.
0 Replies
 
megamanXplosion
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:29 pm
Zipp City US of A wrote:
The problem with science is that it keeps finding it's own self wrong. The proplem with the Bible is people keep mis-interrrupting it with their own mis-understandings.


I prefer the humility of scientists over the ignorant certainty of fools.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:31 pm
Look who's accusing anyone else of hyperventalating and frothing at the mouth. Your proposal sucks. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:35 pm
Arella Mae wrote:
Lightwizard,

If you don't understand the transition of the Old Testament (Mosaic laws) to the New Testament (Covenant of Grace) then I would imagine that would be your perspective of it.


That has nothing to do with what I stated. You haven't read and understood what I have stated. You're offering a convenient diversion using the typical theological rationalization. Don't buy it.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:36 pm
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:

Rex...I defy you to show anything in your supposed refutation of the passage I cited that actually shows the god of the Bible does not consider homosexual acts to be an abomination worthy of death.

Where.

You might just as well have cited "The meek shall inherit the Earth" ....because you have not actually refuted the passage...you have merely avoided it.

The god of the Bible clearly states that homosexual activity is an abomination.

Wake the fuk up!

Stop pretending that you have refuted the passage.

What you have done...very clearly to everyone but you...is to twist logic in an attempt to make the passage seem to say something other than what it says.

That was my point. Thank you for once again showing that my point was correct.

Yes, I will continue to use the passage...because it allows me to allow you to show I am correct in this matter.


Frank, for the 80 millionth time "There are two Gods of the Bible.

Could you repeat that to yourself three times? There are two Gods of the Bible, There are two Gods of the Bible, There are two Gods of the Bible.

2Co 4:4
In whom the god [theos] of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

Comment:
Which God is yours the God of law OR the God of liberty?

1Co 1:20
Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

Comment:
You are obsessed by the God of law and you act as if I should be.

But I'm not.

Anything that exalts itself against the knowledge of Christ is not from the TRUE GOD.

Moses was deficient spiritually, this is why he saw things legally and WITHOUT LIBERTY.

Frank if Moses was such a perfect man "of the God of the Bible" why is he not permitted to enter the promised land? YOU HAVE NO ANSWER FOR THAT EITHER.

Your mind refuses to distinguish and discern spiritually the one true God.

Why? So without ANY God you can sin without impunity or conscience. You intentions are less that honerable.

You figure the only way to liberty is to toss the whole thing.

WRONG! What of the holy spirit and eternity?

Mr 3:29
But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:

Comment:
You are oblivious to issues like WHY THERE IS A NEW TESTAMENT if the old testament was just all hunky dory. Your interpretation has NO answer for that.

Heb 8:7
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.

Comment:
THE GOD OF THE BIBLE IS TWO GODS....

You think your interpretation of the OT is the accepted one and you are closed to any other interpretation of the scriptures.

You think I am twisting the meaning and I am just seeing the scope of the word. I see the complete story.

I see man (Adam) who sinned and gave dominion to the devil I see this dominion being MIXED with the God of the OT. I see the one true God revealed in the New Testament...

Ro 6:9
Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.

Comment:
This is why God will ask for sacrifice of animals and then LATER tells people he never required these sacrifices and they were an abomination to him. The prophets could not discern spirits. (Just as you cannot or will not discern spirits)

1Co 12:10
To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:

Comment:
Christianity is not confessing our sin for salvation

It is confessing the saviour from sin.

Ro 10:9
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

Comment:
NONE of these principles you understand.

You look at the old testament God and SEE "the God of the Bible" instead of a result of the Gods of the Bible.

Look at Job, why was God and the devil so chummy buddies? YOU HAVE NO ANSWER FOR THIS! Because you do not understand TWO GODS.

You fall back on erroneous theological interpretations. YOU have a twisted meaning of the Bible due to not studying it YOURSELF. You remain fixated on what others have taught you.

You are COMPLETELY oblivious to THE SPIRIT and what it means to us.

1Co 2:13
Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.

Comment:
Your OT logic is that everything is God because Moses said it was, Well Moses "thought" it was God, just as YOU DO (then you reject this God)...

The Bible is not incorrect about Moses. You cannot understand that the Bible is showing that Moses WAS fallible. The Bible is not wrong... Moses was wrong. God WARNED Moses that the LAW would be a burden (several times). For some reason this cannot click in your head. Moses saw the world legally because he was not complete spiritually.

Col 2:10
And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:

Comment:
If Moses was so perfect spiritually than why did Jesus need to come "save" the world? YOU HAVE NO ANSWER FOR THIS EITHER FRANK!

Because the devil had an advantage over God.

It was the power given to the devil by Adam.

Adam gave the devil "dominion" over the earth. Dominion was Adams to Give because of free will and because dominion over the earth was Adams. Dominion is a KINGDOM... the kingdoms of the world. These kingdoms are where laws are made. The devil offered Jesus the kingdoms of the world if he would bow down and worship him. How could the devil make such a claim if he did not have the POWER of the kingdoms (dominion) of the world? You are arguing the Bible with someone who knows what it means.

Lu 16:16
The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it

Comment:
YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW THE BIBLE

Let alone the ONE true God of the Bible OR the false God Frank...

Your blindness is the same blindness that Moses suffered from.

LAW Versus LIBERTY

They cannot both occupy the same mind.

Ro 8:3
For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

Comment:
You magnify the God of the OT and you consider the NT God silly... Your motives Frank are not wholesome.

So really the problem is not with the Gods of the Bible but your rank self worshiping arrogance.

This is not twisted logic this is the logic of the BIBLE.
Prove to me the LORD of MOSES was the ONE true God of the NT!
How about some scriptures to back that up? You have NONE!

You don't like this logic so you twist it to fit your hatred of God.

The LORD of the OT was not always what he seemed... You should be proud (sarcasm) to be among those who do not understand this.

Well you are hating the right God, and you are hating the wrong God.

Would I trade being gay for your ignorance of God? Not for all the cheese in Wisconsin.

The law was the schoolmaster until the spirit. Where there is liberty there can be law. Without law there is no sin.

Ga 3:24
Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.

Ga 3:25
But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

Ro 3:20
Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Comment:
All the laws are contained in one law... TO LOVE GOD...

Ro 10:4
For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

Comment:
You hate the GOD of the Bible Frank, so you cannot even follow one law (to love God) let alone all the rest having to do with what "liberty" represents.

How can the OT God and NT God be the same if God "never changes".

Mal 3:6 For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

Comment:
Either God changed or God was never in the LAW. God has always been in the spirit. The true will of Jehovah was obscured by the overlapping of usurped human dominion.

Do not hack and slash my post and answer to only the few statements that do not tip your hand...

I will repost the parts you cut out and ask you why you did not respond to them.

I am getting tired of your idiocy
Why don't you, "wake the fuk up"!

Eph 5:14
Wherefore he saith, Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light.

Acts 7:30-41
30 And when forty years were expired, there appeared to him in the wilderness of mount Sina an angel of the Lord in a flame of fire in a bush. 31 When Moses saw it, he wondered at the sight: and as he drew near to behold it, the voice of the Lord came unto him,
32 Saying, I am the God of thy fathers, the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. Then Moses trembled, and durst not behold.

Comment:
Now what ANGEL was in the burning flame of fire Frank?

How about if you start reading this book for a change.

Abraham Isaac Jacob all saw God the same way?

The DEVIL almost convinced Abraham to slay his son... Had Abraham done that Jesus Christ would never have been born!

Do you really think God would play with our future like that?

The LORD (DEVIL) caused the "great flood" and the LORD (True GOD)saved Noah.

The LORD Giveth (True GOD) and th LORD (DEVIL false God) taketh away...

Ro 1:17
For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

Ga 3:23
But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.

Comment:
I could go on and on proving my point with scriptures...

You have no CLEAR scrptures to prove WHO the God of the Bible is Frank... Only speculation built upon speculation and error built upon error.

You are a follower of followers Frank.


As I said, Rex...please continue to post these rants...because they do much, much more to show how convoluted, twisted, and tortured your logic is in your attempts to make the Bible say other than what it says.

To suppose two gods in order for you to be right is hilarious.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:36 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
Look who's accusing anyone else of hyperventalating and frothing at the mouth. Your proposal sucks. Laughing


Well give is some consideration anyway. Smile

Time will tell how well you have listened.

1Co 2:9
But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:38 pm
Arella Mae wrote:
Zipp City US of A wrote:
The problem with science is that it keeps finding it's own self wrong. The proplem with the Bible is people keep mis-interrrupting it with their own mis-understandings.


Amen to that!

Frank,

First, notice the ID change and respect that please.


Okay, Arella!

Quote:
Second, even the dimmest of light bulbs can offer some light. :wink: [/color]


True! :wink:

Provided it is on, that is! Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:39 pm
Lightwizard Wrote:

Quote:
That has nothing to do with what I stated. You haven't read and understood what I have stated. You're offering a convenient diversion using the typical theological rationalization. Don't buy it.


It doesn't? Shocked Let's see, if you don't have an understanding of something then it's logical that you may not have the correct perception of it. That's not a true statement?

Frank,

No matter what, you can still be a hoot and a half! Laughing
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:41 pm
By the way...

...as I have explained on hundreds of occasions...

...whenever I am talking about the "god of the Bible"...

...I am talking about the god Jesus worshipped!


THE GOD JESUS WORSHIPPED!!!!


That is the god I say thinks homosexual behavior is an abomination worthy of instant death.

THE GOD JESUS WORSHIPPED!!!!

THE GOD JESUS TOLD YOU FOLKS HAD TO BE HONORED AND OBEYED.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:42 pm
Arella Mae wrote:

Frank,

No matter what, you can still be a hoot and a half! Laughing [/color]


Just having a good time tweeking the theists for a while, Arella. I've been spending all my time tweeking the atheists lately...and I didn't want you fine folks to feel overlooked.

Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:53 pm
Frank,

I know, you are an equal opportunity tweeker! Laughing I know which God you are referring to Frank. I honestly do.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 02:55 pm
Frank knows I am not an atheist. I am a scientist in my background of working with plastics, glass, fiber optics, lighting theory, lighting design, et al. If that's too much for some to comprehend and discount it to patting myself on the back, I wouldn't compare that to lauding oneself for the empty triviality about how good looking and sexually attractive they are. I am inclined toward's Aristotle's concept of a God and am sure than no human being is able to understand what kind of intelligence The Great Mover can be identified with. It certainly. for me, has nothing to do with human intelligence.

Science is wise enough to be able to refind and correct himself. Unfortunately, fundamentalist religious heads have little room for that kind of change. They are being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the 21st Century and they may feign that they are adaptable and can cope but they are frightened by the prospect of their theology slipping away into eternity.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 03:01 pm
Er...Rex....

What are the names of the two gods of the Bible?

(Sister Julie Phillip, my theology teacher, would be horrified by such multi-deism.)

Joe(ps. See the First Commandment to Moses)Nation
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 03:04 pm
Lightwizard Wrote:

Quote:
...It certainly. for me, has nothing to do with human intelligence.


http://www.smileys.ws/smls/yahoo/00000035.gif
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 03:08 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
Er...Rex....

What are the names of the two gods of the Bible?

(Sister Julie Phillip, my theology teacher, would be horrified by such multi-deism.)

Joe(ps. See the First Commandment to Moses)Nation


1. Hargar the Horrible
2. Carnac the Magnificent
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 03:12 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
Joe Nation wrote:
Er...Rex....

What are the names of the two gods of the Bible?

(Sister Julie Phillip, my theology teacher, would be horrified by such multi-deism.)

Joe(ps. See the First Commandment to Moses)Nation


1. Hargar the Horrible
2. Carnac the Magnificent


A great big... :wink: ...to both youse guys.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 03:19 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:


As I said, Rex...please continue to post these rants...because they do much, much more to show how convoluted, twisted, and tortured your logic is in your attempts to make the Bible say other than what it says.

To suppose two gods in order for you to be right is hilarious.


Two Gods, that is what THE WORD says. Not just me.

I did not just rant on with my "own" logic but I backed up what I believe with clear simple "scripture".

Where is your scripture to contradict anything I have proposed?

Your whole premise rests on six scriptures.

"Almost" everything else written in the new testament contradicts your premise.

I am not saying this to show you you are wrong, I am showing this to show you the Bible is teaching CLEARLY a new covenant and that Jesus Christ REVEALS the one true "God".

1Jo 1:5
This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.

Comment:
Once this "grace" of God is explained then you cannot read the NT without finding it everywhere.

This "GRACE" has for the most part been lost in today's religion. This is the ideology we are at war with. And you are not part of the solution you are equally part of the conundrum.

Eph 2:5
Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)

Comment:
What works can a dead man do to please God Frank?

Ro 8:8
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

Eph 2:8
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:


Comment:
Frank, you think the way you do in light of the numerous scriptures that reveal the actual TRUTH?

I submit, maybe you don't want to KNOW God.

You are "guessing" Frank

I love you as a brother in Christ Frank and I would (if this is all true) hate for you to suffer damnation.

In the NEW covenant there is only one "unforgivable" sin..

That is to deny the one true God!

When you deny God you deny new birth/holy spiritual "seed" and seed is permanent and eternal. What spiritual seed do you have Frank. Everyone receives one or the other in the course of their lifetime. If they are too young to decide they are sanctified by their parents belief ot that of the "State" (liberty).

1Co 12:3
Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.

Comment: You cannot corrupt the spirit within. You cannot manifest spirit without it present within. Manifestation of the spirit is a "witness" of it's presence within. This witness is proof of one's eternal life.

When your earthly father put earthly seed in you, he put it in you for life. As long as you live he will always be your biological father.

When God puts spiritual seed into you he "creates" it in you for eternal life.

This seed is a "gift" and is not worked for or a wage.

So, a new born believer of God has no more "Christian character" after the new birth than before they were born of spiritual seed. But they now have a means of "power" if they choose to learn to operate and manifest it.

Peace with God
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 03:24 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
Joe Nation wrote:
Er...Rex....

What are the names of the two gods of the Bible?

(Sister Julie Phillip, my theology teacher, would be horrified by such multi-deism.)

Joe(ps. See the First Commandment to Moses)Nation


1. Hargar the Horrible
2. Carnac the Magnificent


1) The God of this world
2) The one true God

Holy spirit must be present within a believer to even discern the difference.

1Co 2:14
But the natural man [body and soul] receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 03:27 pm
It's amazing to me that you drag yourself away from the mirror long enough to read the Bible and quote scripture.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Jul, 2006 03:29 pm
(It also must be a real nuisance for your friends to try and see through the lipstick prints all over that mirror).
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bible vs. Science
  3. » Page 30
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/16/2025 at 03:59:40