1
   

Are people really victim when it comes to beign raped?

 
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Thu 18 May, 2006 10:27 pm
Snood -
You say,
"And I am also clear that all flirtation isn't innocent."

Of course some flirtation is lusty and means it. What has that to do with rape?

Possibly (going along in your direction) some portion of the teaser flirts want to be overcome, in part to excuse them re their ethical backgrounds.
These may be some confused women, or men, as the case may be. Still...
no means no.
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Thu 18 May, 2006 10:31 pm
snood wrote:
You all sound as if you think there's no such thing as a prick tease.

Not that it justifies rape, or anything like that, but all this "it's relative to the culture, and the perspective" stuff seems to deny that there are women who get twisted kicks.


That's a seperate discussion which should most certainly exclude the word 'rape' from the title. Do you agree?

I can say honestly, I am sensitive about this topic.

Rape and PrickTeasers are two seperate issues. I know PussyTeasers too, btw.
Smile
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Thu 18 May, 2006 10:37 pm
ossobuco wrote:
Snood -
You say,
"And I am also clear that all flirtation isn't innocent."

Of course some flirtation is lusty and means it. What has that to do with rape?

Possibly (going along in your direction) some portion of the teaser flirts want to be overcome, in part to excuse them re their ethical backgrounds.
These may be some confused women, or men, as the case may be. Still...
no means no.


That isn't my "direction" - that's all between your ears. If you stopped preaching and being righteously indignant needlessly for a minute you might be able to see that. Can you comprehend that both may be true (some flirtation is not innocent and no means no), and that I made the point because it seemed germaine at the time? Is it possible that I undertand that rape is wrong, but that I made the point that all flirtation is not innocent, because I saw it as relevant to the discussion? And if the answer is yes, you think you can stop blathering "still no means no", as if you're instructing some slow third grader?
0 Replies
 
sakhi
 
  1  
Thu 18 May, 2006 10:38 pm
snood wrote:
sakhi wrote:
snood wrote:
Not that it justifies rape, or anything like that, but all this "it's relative to the culture, and the perspective" stuff seems to deny that there are women who get twisted kicks.


You seem to just want to believe that there are women who get "twisted kicks" and are "asking for rape" with their actions.

Would you argue the same way with murder? Does anyone want to be murdered? robbed? No. Example: there are some women who'd wear a diamond necklace so that other people look at it and drool and wish they could lay their hands on it. But she doesn't want to be robbed of it.

Likewise, there may be women who'l do a lot of things to command male attention, or to even incite lust. But she is not asking for rape.



If I "seem to believe" anyone is "asking for rape" to you, because I insist on being clear that some provocation is intentional, then that is your one-dimensional thinking, and not my problem. I am crystal clear that there is no justification for forcing oneself on someone. And I am also clear that all flirtation isn't innocent.


You haven't answered the other questions in my previous post.

A woman is entitled to "incite lust" either intentionally or unintentionally. Either way, she still retains the right NOT to be raped. Even if you can *prove" that woman ABC purposefully incited lust in the men around her, she still cannot be blamed even to the smallest degree, if a rape happens to her.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Thu 18 May, 2006 10:52 pm
from Snood -
That isn't my "direction" - that's all between your ears. If you stopped preaching and being righteously indignant needlessly for a minute you might be able to see that. Can you comprehend that both may be true (some flirtation is not innocent and no means no), and that I made the point because it seemed germaine at the time? Is it possible that I undertand that rape is wrong, but that I made the point that all flirtation is not innocent, because I saw it as relevant to the discussion? And if the answer is yes, you think you can stop blathering "still no means no", as if you're instructing some slow third grader?


1) if that's not your direction, I still think it's an understandable point of view and was trying to speak to it.

2) I easily see some flirtation is not innocent and no means no, give me a break.

3) I can learn to appreciate that you made that point to bring it up for airing, that all flirtation is not innocent.

Am I blathering?

I don't happen to think of you as a slow third grade learner, Snood, and I often agree with you and have said so from time to time. Perhaps you haven't memorized the times I did, and more of those agreements were silent.

I guess I wouldn't like No Means No chanted at me either. But, it happens to come up from time to time at crucial moments.

Are you thinking I am talking to you as a potential rapist? World wide web and all its accompaniment...
You have me dead wrong on that - if you go there. I don't think you do.
But I can imagine someone going there.


I speak as a woman who said no to no avail, once, long ago. Nothing to do with you or most readers, but still, the concept of no and no is not all so understood, and I want it to be.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Thu 18 May, 2006 11:15 pm
Well, I understand it, and I am not a rapist. And I have experienced some mean spirited sexual teasing. So maybe the intensity all comes from the respective baggage we both carry.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Thu 18 May, 2006 11:29 pm
All right, snood. I'll agree I carry serious baggage.
Perhaps we can talk and shuffle some suitcases verbally.

I guess that would be here at a2k, unless we can all meet shewolf and crew sometime.




***
I suppose I should add that my baggage doesn't mean I don't get all happy about men. Or at least some of them.
I'm approaching 65 (yaaaaack!!!!). Chances for any of us at this age tolerating each other more than three days is dim.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 04:03 am
ossobuco wrote:
All right, snood. I'll agree I carry serious baggage.
Perhaps we can talk and shuffle some suitcases verbally.

I guess that would be here at a2k, unless we can all meet shewolf and crew sometime.




***
I suppose I should add that my baggage doesn't mean I don't get all happy about men. Or at least some of them.
I'm approaching 65 (yaaaaack!!!!). Chances for any of us at this age tolerating each other more than three days is dim.


Common ground! I still get all happy about women.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 06:45 am
ossobuco wrote:
I'll add that I don't know that most rapes are premeditated. Perhaps those are the statistics for reported, researched rapes.


Reported, yes.

Rapes that aren't reported can't be researched.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 07:07 am
Noddy24 wrote:
As for all these hypothetical women dancing naked, sorely tempting [..] men.....

Not all too hypothetical.

Noddy24 wrote:
What about the situation at Duke? Are exotic dancers "asking" to be assulted and raped?

A) I dont think anyone here spoke of anyone "asking" to be assaulted and raped, I believe that is misstating (and twisting) the point that was being made.

References to situations like Chai Tea, Soz or I have brought hardly puts those who make them in the category of saying "they were asking to be raped", and implying so is rather vile.

B) In their case there is no question of looking to attract sex in the first place and that is clear to all concerned from the start; they are looking to make money for a pre-agreed, concretely defined act, and the act is not sex. So no comparison even with the point that was made here (which was itself already not of the "asking for rape" variety)

Noddy24 wrote:
Are nurses "asking" for rape because they "like" to care for naked men?

Huh? That's not even a parallel anymore, thats just out in leftfield.

I dont think I actually disagree all that much on anything with those of you who word the strictest interpretation; I do think posts like this are not being entirely honest in responding to the questions/issues that are raised.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 07:10 am
I didnt know that either, Bella. I knew that by far most rapes are by someone close, and often by the partner ... I was kind of deducing that most must not have been premeditated either. That is disturbing (I mean, extra disturbing).
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 07:23 am
I can't remember where I learned that. I wish I could so I could cite it.

But by premeditated, it's meant that the rapist doesn't just find themselves doing it. Most date rapists don't just start raping. They thought about it before the date even began or at the very least, while the date was taking place. Probably more the "I am going to have sex tonight...she says she doesn't want it but she really does" scenario but rape is rape. (I know, we've determined that)

I think that the word throws people off. How much time does there need to be before the crime for it to be premeditated?

Definition:
Quote:
pre·med·i·ta·tion (prē-mĕd'ĭ-tā'shən)
n.
The act of speculating, arranging, or plotting in advance.
Law. The contemplation of a crime well enough in advance to show deliberate intent to commit the crime; forethought.


The length of time is debatable but it can be argued that even if one thinks about rape and then does it, it is a premeditated crime.

Again, we are getting into legal stuff that I don't understand 100%. Maybe Debra can shed some light on this?
0 Replies
 
Heeven
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 07:57 am
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 08:38 am
Good post Heeven and thanks for sharing. Working at a rape crisis center does give you quite a different perspective on things, doesn't it? Often, you are the only one that person has told. And from the responses of many here (not just this post but others in the past), you definitely can see why someone would be hesitant about admitting a rape.


Heeven wrote:

However, when a woman blatantly and physically comes onto a man, she does share some responsibility for HER actions. You just cannot treat people like this and think that is okay.


Absolutely. But do her actions cause the rape? Would he have raped her regardless? Maybe, maybe not. The man who rapes is the only one who controls whether or not he rapes someone. That's why I can't agree with the victims responsibility thing. It's like getting into an argument with someone, very heated, and you say "I could just kill you". You may want to hurt them but you don't. If you do shoot and kill them, was it their fault for "making" you do it?

Heeven wrote:


I think when people say it's not about sex, they mean that sexual gratification isn't the number one reason men rape. A man can get sex from lots of places. Rape is a power struggle. It's getting off on the power, not the sex.

In fact, sometimes the rapist doesn't even ejaculate in the victim.

I will agree that date rape can definitely start out mostly about sex. But I think that the "I can't stop" of date rape stems from the "This girl owes me now" syndrome. The whole idea of she led me on and now she owes me. Which to me, is more about ego and dominance than sex.

Again, good post Heeven.
0 Replies
 
Heeven
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 09:19 am
Bella Dea wrote:


Heeven wrote:

However, when a woman blatantly and physically comes onto a man, she does share some responsibility for HER actions. You just cannot treat people like this and think that is okay.


Absolutely. But do her actions cause the rape? Would he have raped her regardless? Maybe, maybe not. The man who rapes is the only one who controls whether or not he rapes someone. That's why I can't agree with the victims responsibility thing. It's like getting into an argument with someone, very heated, and you say "I could just kill you". You may want to hurt them but you don't. If you do shoot and kill them, was it their fault for "making" you do it?


I was talking about a woman taking stock of herself moreso than an actual legal responsibility for what happened to her. I most certainly do not believe that a woman, who behaves (in my opinion) in an outrageously lewd and lacivious way and all but jumps the mans bones intent on the sexual act and then skitters away at the last minute laughing at the poor feeble man, is asking to be raped. Rape is wrong, wrong, wrong. My point is rather in line with what Snood was getting across - some women do behave rather digracefully and, while not asking to get raped, can certainly display rather disingenuous character flaws.

No-one 'deserves' to be raped, beaten, robbed, murdered, etc. No-one intentionally sets out to have these things happen to them. No-one displays their wares calling on others to do them wrong. Unfortunately they are things that do happen and they are always the fault of the violator not the violatee (is that a word?).

The item of women being prick-teasers (some women, not many I hope but a few here and there) is a character flaw. Yes it is inflammatory to men and yes it could lead to frustration and violence. Does it mean the woman shares responsibility for the rape? No. Does it mean the woman should learn some self-respect? Yes.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 09:23 am
Heeven wrote:
Does it mean the woman shares responsibility for the rape? No. Does it mean the woman should learn some self-respect? Yes.


I agree with you 100%

And if this is what others are trying to say, I agree with you as well.
0 Replies
 
Heeven
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 09:31 am
I think thats exactly what Snood was saying. It's not the fact that we all don't think that rape is 100% wrong - I think we all do agree on that one but it is quite true that we have to be open to all peoples feelings in the matter that not everyone behaves perfectly correctly.

Ah, that's one of the beautys of A2K. I learn something valuable every day (or every other day)!
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 09:52 am
thanks, Heeven.
0 Replies
 
Heeven
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 10:17 am
Just noticed the author of the thread never came back to comment. Does she know the debate she started?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Fri 19 May, 2006 10:18 am
How odd . . . personally, i assumed the author was male . . .
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/10/2025 at 12:51:50