Bill O'Reilly caught lyin' again.

snood wrote:

McGentrix wrote:
snood wrote:
JustanObserver wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
O'reilly is no match for the vacuous entertainment found on broadcast television.

I wholeheartedly agree.

Unless you meant that the "vacuous entertainment found on broadcast television is no match for O'Reilly", in which case... I don't.

Yeah - you know McGentrix.

He couldn't resist the unwieldy, backhanded try to get in a word of support... O'Reilly's a man after McG's own widdle bitty heart.

You must have deep into that compost pile you call a brain to get that one snood. I bet you are very proud of yourself for coming off as a complete moron though.

I was not supporting O'Reilly, I was denigrating the public that watches American Idol and the other crap found on broadcast TV. Is that you? I bet you are a regular voter, aren't you.

Yeah, I know ,
McG - you don't even care about those talking heads like Hannity, Limburger and O'Reilly... your whole raison d'etre posting on this thread was to make a comment on the mentality of the general tv viewing public.... I believe you, I really do....

I watch approx. 8 hours of tv a week. None of them involve the talking heads you have listed.

But, instead of making this about me, snood, why don't you try to speak to the topic of the thread, as I was doing.

0 Replies

McGentrix wrote:

snood wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
snood wrote:
JustanObserver wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
O'reilly is no match for the vacuous entertainment found on broadcast television.

I wholeheartedly agree.

Unless you meant that the "vacuous entertainment found on broadcast television is no match for O'Reilly", in which case... I don't.

Yeah - you know McGentrix.

He couldn't resist the unwieldy, backhanded try to get in a word of support... O'Reilly's a man after McG's own widdle bitty heart.

You must have deep into that compost pile you call a brain to get that one snood. I bet you are very proud of yourself for coming off as a complete moron though.

I was not supporting O'Reilly, I was denigrating the public that watches American Idol and the other crap found on broadcast TV. Is that you? I bet you are a regular voter, aren't you.

Yeah, I know ,
McG - you don't even care about those talking heads like Hannity, Limburger and O'Reilly... your whole raison d'etre posting on this thread was to make a comment on the mentality of the general tv viewing public.... I believe you, I really do....

I watch approx. 8 hours of tv a week. None of them involve the talking heads you have listed.

But, instead of making this about me, snood, why don't you try to speak to the topic of the thread, as I was doing.

No, you weren't, nimrod. The thread is about O'Reilly being caught in a lie. You wanted to talk about vapid tv and its viewers. But, no matter - O'Reillys a demagogueing bully and a liar, and you're a loyal lemming- like fan - watch him or not, you showed up here to deflect criticism from him. Now that you want to lie about your motivation is right in character.

Speak to the topic? I'd be glad to talk about other lies O'Reillys been caught in, but - you don't watch him, so you can't really comment on that, outside of blind partisan jabber, huh?

0 Replies

I didn't figure you could stop snood.

0 Replies

McGentrix wrote:

I didn't figure you could stop snood.

You flatter yourself, McG - you're just so consistently wrong that it actually saves you from total uselessness as a participant - it makes you amusing as hell.

Anyway, in deference to the launch post subject matter, here are some other lies of gasbag O'Reilly:

"I understand working-class Americans" is one of O'Reilly's recurring lines. "I'm as lower-middle-class as they come". His father, he says, "never earned more than $35,000 a year in his life". In reality, while the O'Reillys were not rich, the father was a fairly well-paid oil company executive, and $35k then would be roughly $100,000 a year today. The O'Reilly kids went to private schools, and O'Reilly's father paid his tuition to a private college.

"I'll tell you what. I've been in combat. I've seen it, I've been close to it... and if my unit is danger, and I've got a captured guy, and the guy knows where the enemy is, and I'm looking him in the eye, the guy better tell me. That's all I'm gonna tell you. The guy better tell me. If it's life or death, he's going first." O'Reilly was never in the military.

On CBS' Late Show with David Letterman, Bill O'Reilly resurrected his false claim that a Wisconsin elementary school banned the singing of the Christmas hymn "Silent Night," erroneously attributing the school's changed lyrics to political correctness. In fact, the new lyrics were merely part of a 1988 Christmas play called The Little Tree's Christmas Gift. Later in the interview, Letterman admonished O'Reilly, asserting, "I have the feeling about 60 percent of what you say is crap."

An O'Reilly lie about Christmas:
O'REILLY: "In Saginaw, Michigan, the township opposes red and green clothing on anyone. [Laughing] In Saginaw Township, they basically said, anybody, we don't want you to wear red or green. I would dress up head to toe in red to green if I were in Saginaw, Michigan."
False. Saginaw township issued a statement flatly denying this ridiculous accusation and noting that the township hall has red and green christmas lights on it as well.

...there are others - dozens of others. The man is a lying sack of excrement. And those who try to defend him, either straight-up -with some courage, or surreptitiously and chickehsh*t like McG, aren't any better.

0 Replies

McGentrix wrote:

I didn't figure you could stop snood.

Appears you were right. Laughing

0 Replies

SierraSong wrote:

McGentrix wrote:
I didn't figure you could stop snood.

Appears you were right.

Actually, he replied with yet more examples of O'Reilley's lies, so it's appreciated. He added substance to the thread. Unlike the both of you, who in this instance are just making childish comments to get in the last word.

Anyway, we should just keep posting other examples of Bill's B.S. here...I'm sure it would make for an impressive list.

0 Replies

Yes, and because, for some unknown reason, Fox channel is viewed by so many gullible viewers, O'Reilly must be stopped. Who does he think he is telling so many lies, Bill Clinton?

I watched his program for four weeks. I did not miss a single one of his programs and he never ever approached the real truth. He always twisted it to his own ends.

Despite his unexplained high ratings, O'Reilly needs lessons in communication.

If he read up on one of the master communicators of the last century- William Jefferson Clinton--he would learn how to communicate truth.

When Bill Clinton was pressed about his use of Marijuana as a student at Oxford, he truthfully commented--But I didn't inhale.

When Bill Clinton was asked he claimed that "fellatio was not a form of "Sexual relations within the meaning given the term for purposes of the deposition"

Bill Clinton claimed that he "had not been really alone with Lewinsky because there had always been other people in the vicinity"

Bill Clinton claimed that he had only received one or two gifts from Lewinsky when she had given him some thirty gifts.

It may very well be that I am mistaken. Perhaps O"Reilly has indeed read of the "evasions" practiced by the former president of the United States and has decided to imitate him.

Alas, it seems that O'Reilly is not as good a liar as Clinton since Clinton, who may very well be psychotic, actually believes he was telling the truth at all times.

0 Replies

blatham wrote:

Such a putz.

Yes, Bill Clinton is a putz. A tiny toad, but a putz never-the-less.

0 Replies

Quote:

O'Reilly is not as good a liar as Clinton since Clinton,

Could this be, because of the difference between "lace-curtain" Irish and "shanty Irish"?

0 Replies

SierraSong wrote:

McGentrix wrote:
I didn't figure you could stop snood.

Appears you were right.

snood's ego is far to large to allow him to stop.

0 Replies

The alleged size of his ego has nothing to do with it. Why should he stop? He's discussing the topic of the thread, unlike the right wing ranters who are here to whine about the subject being discussed at all.

0 Replies

BernardR wrote:

Who does he think he is telling so many lies, Bill Clinton?
...
If he read up on one of the master communicators of the last century- William Jefferson Clinton--he would learn how to communicate truth.

B-B-B-B-B-BUT CLINTON!

Seriously, what the f*ck? I wonder why some people are SO desperate that they have to throw Clinton into EVERY argument, no matter how unrelated.

This thread is about Bill O'Reilly. It has nothing to do with Clinton. It's not Clinton related, it's not about some policy that Clinton influenced, nor is related to anything Clinton said.

It absolutely REEKS of desperation when he's used as a strawman in threads completely unrelated to him. Get over it already, for Chrissakes.

0 Replies

It's his schtick.
Every post I read from him/her drops the C-bomb.
Probably a disgruntled righty incognito inflaming the rightist cause.

0 Replies

He knows five things to talk about: Clinton, the Kennedys, genetics, Albee, and beastiality. Somehow, they are all related to everything else, and they all must be brought up as often as possible in as many threads as possible when they seem to pertain as little as possible to everything else.

Frankly, I'm already bored.

(Did I do the "mean guy" thing okay? I've never really tried it before. But, like, really...)

0 Replies

smog wrote:

He knows five things to talk about: Clinton, the Kennedys, genetics, Albee, and beastiality. Somehow, they are all related to everything else, and they all must be brought up as often as possible in as many threads as possible when they seem to pertain as little as possible to everything else.

Frankly, I'm already bored.

(Did I do the "mean guy" thing okay? I've never really tried it before. But, like, really...)

Mean Guy Scoresheet
(scored on a 1-5 scale)

1)ruthlessness - 4
2)originality of insult - 4
3)clarity - 5
4)timeliness - 5

Score - 4.5!!!!!!!!

.....very respectable, for a first timer....

0 Replies

Ya gotta wonder about a network that lets this guy keep his show on....

Those are the lies he's been caught in.

And he's appearing on a purportedly new-oriented network.

It drags down the reliability of the entire network.

Drew (Fair and Balanced my tookus) Dad

0 Replies

If everyone here complaining would just stop watching him, his ratings would probably go down LOL.

Oh, and if every talk show that lied to its listeners was shut down, Airhead America would have been gone long ago (probably why it's on its last legs now).

This is sour grapes no matter how you try to spin it.

0 Replies

Those who feel that President Clinton must never ever be mentioned when the subject of lying comes up are really not familiar with Presidentail Historians and their writings.

The name of FDR is regulary invoked when the subject of the New Deal is mentioned.

Nixon is almost always included in any discussion of Presidents who have been impeached.

Carter is regulary listed when the names of Presidents who have caused economic chaos are noted.

Anyone who thinks that President Clinton is not among the most egregious liars of all time really has not kept up with their reading. I will be happy to supply numerous instances.

As I said- It may well be that O'Reilly got his penchant for lying because he read what the master( Clinton) did. But O'Reilly will never be able to match Clinton's litany of lies.

For those who are aggrieved when Clinton's name is invoked, I promise never to mention his name again when lying is discussed if there are no other comparisions made of politicians with each other.

0 Replies

That's OK, Bernard. You can be tiresome and repetitious any time you want. You have the right to do that here...

0 Replies

Mr. Smog: I am very much afraid that you have either been misinformed or have not read as widely as you should. Just for you, sir, I will keep a log on the topics I discuss and when appropriate, will advise you.

I hope that will be helpful!!!

I love your name. Do you bear that name because you are in any way interested in "global warming". If so, I would be happy to discuss that interesting topic with you. Then, you can add another topic to your list.

0 Replies

Bill O'Reilly caught lyin' again.

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know