Tony Snow Prediction

I am certain that Mr. Snow's press sessions will not reveal any conservative bias on his part. The job requires that he communicate the Administration's positions on the issue.

HOUSTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush has long opposed making English the country's national language, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said on Friday, the day after the Senate voted to do so.

Q I know you said the administration wouldn't take a position on every amendment related to the Senate's dealing with the immigration legislation, but do you have a view on its treatment of the English language amendment?

MR. SNOW: As you know, there were actually a couple of amendments that came up yesterday, an Inhofe amendment and also a Salazar amendment. And what has come out of that is a description of English as the national language. And I think -- and we have supported both of these. So the answer is the administration -- as the President has said, one of the things that you want to make sure is that when at the end of a path, people who wish to become American citizens are ready for that, that they have a command of the English language. And I think both of these amendments are consistent with that stated presidential desire.

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

Dlowan to the rescue of her fellow tool!

Bi-po presented a diatribe. Do you really want to tell us it was a cohesive argument? Please feel free to defend an promote his tripe.

If you actually have a position which you would like to advance, how about posting it in your words rather than resorting to tiresome cut and paste productions.

Your ineffectual and boring clap-trap serves little purpose. Seize the issue, if you can, and engage in an intellectual debate.

Come on....

Ah...and you, of course, showed the way to a better and more gracious level of debate.

Not a more gracious level of debate, only a more cogent one.



Oddly enough, Finn, and I know this is a novelty for your world view, I actually told the truth.

I have no knowledge of this Snow fella, though I am suspicious of him as a tool of the current administration.

Well of course you would be, and since BiPo attacked him he must be a tool!

I am interested if you are able to, on a rational basis, assert whether he is a journalist of note, or a spineless lackey.

So it is your position that this argument:

"If he wasn't a lying sack of **** this morning he will be by Monday morning. Job requirement."

Requires a detailed and rational response?

You APPEARED to be defending him in that whatever the hell it was you deposited.....are you doing so?

Do you think him a person of journalistic repute?


If not, why so enbiled?

As a matter of fact I do think him a person of journalistic repute, and if you spent 10 minutes doing simple google research, you would find this, far more so that Bi-Po's calumny, to be the case.

What cause my bile ducts to flow is#1 the rampant and vulgar expressions of pathetic ex-hippies, and #2 the inane support they receive from lock-step Liberals.

Ah Finn honey, I don't think you love me.

Here is the position I advance. Tony Snow has spoken about your daddy bush like he was ****.... which he is as far as I'm concerned and then takes a job as his chief defender and mouthpiece. I smell pussy. Sell out pussy. There are many who will put it more graciously, but none more accurately.

If you don't like it or me that changes nothing although it does crush my self esteem and make me want to cry. Have a nice day sweetie.

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

If you actually have a position which you would like to advance, how about posting it in your words rather than resorting to tiresome cut and paste productions.

I believe her position is, according to the first post, that Snow is already a lying sack of **** and that no great transformation will take place before Monday.

WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY TONY SNOW: Whether it passes or not, as you know, Terry, there have been a number of cases where civil rights matters have risen on a number of occasions, and they've been brought up for repeated consideration by the United States Senate and other legislative bodies...

Q You mentioned civil rights. Are you comparing this to various civil rights measures which have come to the Congress over the years?

MR. SNOW: Not -- well, these -- it --

Q Is this a civil right?

MR. SNOW: Marriage? It actually -- what we're really talking about here is an attempt to try to maintain the traditional meaning of an institution that has maintained one meeting for -- meaning for a period of centuries. And furthermore --

Q And you would equate that with civil rights?

MR. SNOW: No, I'm just saying that I think -- well, I don't know. How do you define civil rights?

Q It's not up to me. Up to you.

MR. SNOW: Okay. Well, no, it's your question. So I -- if I --

Q (Chuckles.)

MR. SNOW: I need to get a more precise definition.

blueveinedthrobber wrote:

Ah Finn honey, I don't think you love me.

Here is the position I advance. Tony Snow has spoken about your daddy bush like he was ****.... which he is as far as I'm concerned and then takes a job as his chief defender and mouthpiece. I smell pussy. Sell out pussy. There are many who will put it more graciously, but none more accurately.

If you don't like it or me that changes nothing although it does crush my self esteem and make me want to cry. Have a nice day sweetie.

Clearly nothing can crush your self-esteem as, presumably, you read your own posted tripe and proceed.

Snow has criticized Bush. There is no question of that. I suppose this translates to speaking about him "like he was a ****," in your 7th grader's scatological world. More mature worldviews might appreciate that supporting an individual, in general, doesn't preclude criticism on occasion. Of course Bi-Po/Peter Pan has no use for anything approaching "mature."

It is interesting that you and your ilk jump on Bush appointments for their perceived inability to challenge the positions of The Boss, and then jump on those who have. One would imagine that you folks would be welcoming Tony Snow, but then one would also have to imagine that there was any consistency to your arguments.

Where would A2K be without the pithy graffiti of Bi-Po?

"I smell pussy. Sell out pussy."

Indeed, there is no grace in these comments, but accuracy?

Bi-Po, you may, indeed, be an expert on the various odors of the American pussy, but you know shite about much else.

I am appalled that Tony Snow "Stumbled" when asked to defend his conception of "civil rights" and had the temerity to ask for a more precise definition.

He should review the statements of the greatest orator in American History who would, of course, give him ideas as how to stay out of trouble.

I am speaking, of course, of William Jefferson Clinton who brilliantly responded to the charge that he had smoked Marijuana at Oxford, that while he had tried Marijuana , he hadn't "inhaled".

Finn's comment that left wingers criticized Snow although they did not know much about them, clearly reveals the knee jerk reactions of the left wing. Anything that is within the Bush Administration is, prima facie, inoperable in any way.

What are you talking about? You know that they don't allow people with human characteristics into Raleigh. You can't know what human characteristics are. I was in North Carolina once. Most of the state reminded me of the scene from Deliverance. Sub normal men and women with highly retarded banjo playing children!

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

blueveinedthrobber wrote:

Ah Finn honey, I don't think you love me.

Here is the position I advance. Tony Snow has spoken about your daddy bush like he was ****.... which he is as far as I'm concerned and then takes a job as his chief defender and mouthpiece. I smell pussy. Sell out pussy. There are many who will put it more graciously, but none more accurately.

If you don't like it or me that changes nothing although it does crush my self esteem and make me want to cry. Have a nice day sweetie.

Clearly nothing can crush your self-esteem as, presumably, you read your own posted tripe and proceed.

Snow has criticized Bush. There is no question of that. I suppose this translates to speaking about him "like he was a ****," in your 7th grader's scatological world. More mature worldviews might appreciate that supporting an individual, in general, doesn't preclude criticism on occasion. Of course Bi-Po/Peter Pan has no use for anything approaching "mature."

It is interesting that you and your ilk jump on Bush appointments for their perceived inability to challenge the positions of The Boss, and then jump on those who have. One would imagine that you folks would be welcoming Tony Snow, but then one would also have to imagine that there was any consistency to your arguments.

Where would A2K be without the pithy graffiti of Bi-Po?

"I smell pussy. Sell out pussy."

Indeed, there is no grace in these comments, but accuracy?

Bi-Po, you may, indeed, be an expert on the various odors of the American pussy, but you know shite about much else.

I know a pissy old grump when I meet one... and I know how to rile 'em up for my amusement and the amusement of others.