1
   

Tony Snow Prediction

 
 
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 04:52 pm
If he wasn't a lying sack of **** this morning he will be by Monday morning. Job requirement.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 3,440 • Replies: 94
No top replies

 
astromouse
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 06:04 pm
If??????
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 06:10 pm
Them Iranians are training intercontinental ballistic missiles on your grannie's house as we speak.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 06:10 pm
Yep, this walking hairdo of a puppet nobody fits what they needed extremely well. He will defend their lies with his hack journalistic smarm-charm to the bitter end.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 May, 2006 01:41 am
Re: Tony Snow Prediction
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
If he wasn't a lying sack of **** this morning he will be by Monday morning. Job requirement.


What an intelligent and coherent criticism of Mr Snow!

Actually this is a perfect example of how tools like bi-po can be relied upon to vomit forth the stinking shite of their "party."

Bi-Po the 60's iconoclast, and yet he so readily succumbs to the rhetoric of the swine who would fiddle with his strings.

Poor Bi-Po believes that he has independently planted a stake in the ground.

Yeah....right.

Bi-po can't help himself but follow the tirades of the ineffectual firebrands who suggest that old farts might recapture their youth and make a difference,

Making a difference. This is the ultimate outcome of the wild-assed Lefties. How sad is it that they make no difference at all?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 May, 2006 02:14 am
Well, speaking of vomit, that was sure an example.

But, better, for your health anyway, Finn, if not the world's, out that in.

Whoa! That **** must be dissolving your innards, as well as your brain.


Now...for anyone willing to engage in actual discussion, as opposed to whatever the hell that was.

I looked at this and, not having followed Snow, I cannot comment on it.



Can anyone rationally dispute, with evidence, these comments?


Media Matters for America
Fri, Apr 21, 2006 8:47pm EST


Even more Tony Snow falsehoods
Summary: Media Matters for America documented a number of Tony Snow's false or misleading claims when it was reported that he was on the shortlist for the position of White House press secretary. Following are numerous additional claims advanced by Snow in print and on the air.

Speculation that the Bush administration will tap Fox News' Tony Snow to succeed Scott McClellan as White House press secretary has intensified in recent days. The New York Daily News reported on April 20 that Snow "is emerging as the front-runner to replace McClellan," and an April 21 New York Times article disclosed that he is "in negotiations for the job." Snow is a syndicated columnist, host of Fox News Radio's The Tony Snow Show, and co-hosts Fox News' Weekend Live with Brian Wilson.

Media Matters for America documented a number of Snow's false or misleading claims when it was reported that he was on the shortlist. Following are numerous additional claims advanced by Snow in print and on the air.

Warrantless domestic surveillance
Suggested Democrats objected to Bush's warrantless spying because they think the "government should not be able to listen to Al Qaeda": While speaking to Fox News political analyst Bob Beckel, Snow suggested that "Democratic opposition" to the warrantless domestic surveillance program arose from the belief that "the government should not be able to listen to Al Qaeda people talking to American citizens." Further, Snow claimed that the lack of additional domestic terrorist attacks was "a sign of [the program's] success." As Media Matters has noted, this false claim was first made by White House senior adviser Karl Rove during an address to the Republican National Committee at its winter meeting and was quickly spread as a talking point by numerous conservatives. But, contrary to Rove and Snow's assertion, no national Democratic figure -- member of the Democratic leadership in Congress, Democratic governor, or Democratic Party official -- has said that the United States should not be intercepting calls suspected to involve Al Qaeda. Moreover, Snow's claims about the program's effectiveness are not supported by the evidence.
Claimed that Carter and Bush both authorized warrantless surveillance of U.S. citizens: Snow asserted that former President Jimmy Carter had "signed an executive order that authorized the attorney general to approve electronic surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence information." Snow went on to claim that this represented "exactly what the president is doing." But Snow ignored a crucial difference: Carter, unlike Bush, prohibited such surveillance of U.S. citizens. Indeed, Carter's order specifically required the attorney general to certify that the surveillance will not contain "the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party." [Fox News' Weekend Live, 12/24/05]
Claimed that the FISA probable cause standard kept the FBI from inspecting Moussaoui's laptop: Snow said that FBI agents in possession of Zacarias Moussaoui's laptop "decided not to go ahead and look at the contents because they ... had no definite proof that the guy was a terrorist" and, therefore, couldn't meet the probable cause standard necessary for a warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). But Snow ignored the bipartisan finding by the Senate Judiciary Committee that the investigators had possessed sufficient evidence but that FBI attorneys had applied a too-stringent standard for establishing probable, preventing the investigators from petitioning the court for authorization. [Fox News' Weekend Live, 12/24/05]
Claimed that 2002 FISA review court opinion allowed for warrantless domestic surveillance: Snow stated that a 2002 opinion (In re: Sealed Case No. 02-001) by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review "says the president's inherent authority allows him" to eavesdrop on the international communications of U.S. residents. But the claim misrepresents the 2002 decision, in which the court said only that the president has inherent authority to conduct foreign intelligence surveillance without a warrant. The court did not rule on the question of whether a president has the constitutional authority to spy on people in the United States without a warrant, in apparent violation of FISA.

CIA leak investigation
Falsely claimed that Wilson said Cheney had sent him to Niger: Snow claimed in his July 15, 2005, column that former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV said he "had been dispatched by [Vice President] Dick Cheney to conduct a secret mission to Niger." In fact, Wilson never claimed that Cheney sent him on the trip. To the contrary, he wrote in his July 6, 2003, op-ed in The New York Times that the CIA requested he go on the mission "so they could provide a response" to questions raised by Cheney regarding allegations that Iraq had attempted to purchase uranium from the African country.
Claimed that Intel Committee "discovered" that Plame recommended Wilson for the Niger mission: In his July 15, 2005, column, Snow further claimed that the Senate Intelligence Committee, in its 2004 "Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq," "discovered that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, did indeed recommend him for the trip" to Niger. But the committee did not officially conclude that she had been responsible for Wilson's assignment. Media Matters previously noted that Snow had falsely asserted that Wilson said his wife "wasn't covert for six years" before she was exposed as a CIA operative by syndicated columnist Robert Novak.

Terrorism
Falsely accused Clinton of rejecting bin Laden offer: Snow advanced the discredited claim that Sudan had offered to "hand over" Osama bin Laden to the United States in the 1990s, but that the Clinton administration responded, "Nah, don't want to do it." But this claim is derived from an August 11, 2002, article on right-wing news website NewsMax that distorted a speech Clinton made in 2002. Indeed, the bipartisan 9-11 Commission found (page 3) "no reliable evidence to support" the claim that Sudan offered bin Laden to the United States and determined that, based on Clinton's testimony, in "wrongly recounting a number of press stories he had read," Clinton had "misspoken" in his 2002 speech. [Fox News' Weekend Live, 2/25/06]
Claimed botched CIA attack on Ayman Al-Zawahiri "was a success": Snow claimed the January 13 CIA drone attack in western Pakistan targeting top Al Qaeda official al-Zawahiri "was a success." Further, Snow and guest Richard Miniter both claimed the attack "knocked off four to five key Al Qaeda" figures. In fact, the strike reportedly killed at least 18 civilians, sparking widespread Pakistani condemnation and protests. Initially, U.S. officials claimed that, at minimum, some high level Al Qaeda officials were among those killed in the attacks, but this claim was never officially confirmed. A January 20 Financial Times report (subscription required) noted: "Pakistani intelligence official confirmed the identities [of alleged Al Qaeda officals] were made on the basis of intelligence information and not 'facts gathered through DNA tests or any other means.' " [Fox News' Weekend Live, 1/21/06]
Deemed Gitmo "the most humane prisoner-of-war facility in history": In a June 15, 2005, column, Snow wrote that the Pentagon's military detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, "may be the most humane prisoner-of-war facility in history."

Immigration
Called immigrants rights protestors "idiots": In response to Republican strategist Linda Chavez's claim that the flying of Mexican flags by Mexican-Americans at a 1994 protest led to the passage of California's controversial Proposition 187, Snow said, "So, to quote the famous movie Napoleon Dynamite --'idiots.' " [Fox News' Weekend Live, 4/1/06]

From the December 24, 2005, edition of Fox News' Weekend Live:

SNOW: Shortly after its [FISA's] passage, your then-president, Jimmy Carter, signed an executive order that authorized the attorney general to approve electronic surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence information without a court order and then, subject to having the attorney general sign off. That's exactly what this president is doing, corrrect?

[...]

CHAVEZ: The president has the inherent authority under the Constitution. There have been a series of Supreme Court rulings. There's been a most recent ruling by 2002 of the FISA appeals court.

SNOW: It was the FISA court -- something called In re: Sealed Case 2002 [sic], where it says the president's inherent authority allows him to do this.

[...]

SNOW: As a matter of fact, when they seized the laptop of Zacarias Moussaoui, FBI agents decided not to go ahead and look at the contents because they were afraid they couldn't establish probable cause because they had no definite proof that the guy was a terrorist.

From the January 21 edition of Weekend Live:

SNOW: What seems also odd about this is that the tape was released just about a day after it became perfectly obvious that the CIA strike -- the Predator strike in western Pakistan -- was a success.

MINITER: A great success.

SNOW: They not only -- they not only hit a place where Zawahiri had met earlier with [Abu Faraj] al-Libbi -- who has since fallen into American clutches -- but also, it knocked off four to five key Al Qaeda guys.

MINITER: Right, including the head of the Kunar Province operations, which is the main battleground in Afghanistan against U.S. forces at the moment. And their top bomb maker and poison gas maker. You know, it's a great hit from the "war on terror" perspective. Also, they werevery careful to wait until the sun had set, because, by that time, the meal would have been put down, and men and women eat separately in that part of Pakistan, so the Predator waited, hoping to avoid civilian casualties -- a point that gets lost in all this coverage.

SNOW: Well, it does get lost in the coverage mainly because people don't -- you know, they don't understand the end of the eye -- they don't understand any of that stuff.

[...]

SNOW: Bob, let me ask you a different question. On the surveillance front: You've got a bin Laden tape -- there've been people saying the government should not be able to listen to Al Qaeda people talking to American citizens. What does that do politically to the Democratic opposition to the surveillance plan, if anything?

BECKEL: Well, first of all, I'll tell you, it obviously says more -- I don't -- if you've got a surveillance plan -- I haven't seen one single thing come out of this surveillance plan. I would assume, by now, that somebody in the administration --

SNOW: But, wait a minute, is that not a sign of success? If you have surveillance and you don't have crime, that would seem to be a sign of success.

From the February 25 edition of Weekend Live:

SNOW: You know also that some of those people who were lunching with bin Laden offered to hand him over -- to serve as the go-between between the government of Sudan and the U.S. -- during the Clinton years. And the Clinton administration said, "Nah, don't want to do it." So, it's an interesting tale.

From the April 1 edition of Weekend Live:

SNOW: Give me your response to sort of pro-immigrant groups that are doing rallies like this and waving Mexican and other flags -- are they doing more harm than good to their cause?

CHAVEZ: They're doing a lot of harm. And, in fact, back in 1994, when California considered an anti-immigrant provision -- Proposition 187 -- that was -- that initiative was actually going down in the polls. It was ahead a week before the election by only one point, then 70,000 Mexican-Americans took to the streets flying Mexican flags and -- guess what? -- it won by 59 percent. So, these folks would do a whole lot better if they would only fly the Red, White, and Blue.

SNOW: So, to quote the famous movie Napoleon Dynamite --"idiots."

—J.K. & J.M.
Comments (21) Show



http://mediamatters.org/items/200604220001


There's a video there, BTW.



Here are some Snow archives, for anyone interested:


http://www.townhall.com/columnists/tonysnow/archive.shtml





Some Snow comments on Bush, from before.


Now, of course, the press Secretary's job is to make the boss look good....still, they are kinda interesting:


Tony Snow On President Bush: ‘An Embarrassment,’ ‘Impotent,’ ‘Doesn’t Seem To Mean What He Says’

[UPDATE: Also see what Tony Snow has to say on the issues.]

Fox News’ Tony Snow is expected to be named White House Press Secretary. Here’s some of what he’s had to say about the President:

– Bush has “lost control of the federal budget and cannot resist the temptation to stop raiding the public fisc.” [3/17/06]

– “George W. Bush and his colleagues have become not merely the custodians of the largest government in the history of humankind, but also exponents of its vigorous expansion.” [3/17/06]

– “President Bush distilled the essence of his presidency in this year’s State of the Union Address: brilliant foreign policy and listless domestic policy.” [2/3/06]

– “George Bush has become something of an embarrassment.” [11/11/05]

– Bush “has a habit of singing from the Political Correctness hymnal.” [10/7/05]

– “No president has looked this impotent this long when it comes to defending presidential powers and prerogatives.” [9/30/05]

– Bush “has given the impression that [he] is more eager to please than lead, and that political opponents can get their way if they simply dig in their heels and behave like petulant trust-fund brats, demanding money and favor — now!” [9/30/05]

– “When it comes to federal spending, George W. Bush is the boy who can’t say no. In each of his three years at the helm, the president has warned Congress to restrain its spending appetites, but so far nobody has pushed away from the table mainly because the president doesn’t seem to mean what he says.” [The Detroit News, 12/28/03]

– “The president doesn’t seem to give a rip about spending restraint.” [The Detroit News, 12/28/03]

– “Bush, for all his personal appeal, ultimately bolstered his detractors’ claims that he didn’t have the drive and work ethic to succeed.” [11/16/00]

– “Little in the character of demeanor of Al Gore or George Bush makes us say to ourselves: Now, this man is truly special! Little in our present peace and prosperity impels us to say: Give us a great man!” [8/25/00]

– “George W. Bush, meanwhile, talks of a pillowy America, full of niceness and goodwill. Bush has inherited his mother’s attractive feistiness, but he also got his father’s syntax. At one point last week, he stunned a friendly audience by barking out absurd and inappropriate words, like a soul tortured with Tourette’s.” [8/25/00]

– “He recently tried to dazzle reporters by discussing the vagaries of Congressional Budget Office economic forecasts, but his recitation of numbers proved so bewildering that not even his aides could produce a comprehensible translation. The English Language has become a minefield for the man, whose malaprops make him the political heir not of Ronald Reagan, but Norm Crosby.” [8/25/00]

– “On the policy side, he has become a classical dime-store Democrat. He gladly will shovel money into programs that enjoy undeserved prestige, such as Head Start. He seems to consider it mean-spirited to shut down programs that rip-off taxpayers and mislead supposed beneficiaries.” [8/25/00]


http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/25/snow-on-bush/
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 May, 2006 02:28 am
Dlowan to the rescue of her fellow tool!

Bi-po presented a diatribe. Do you really want to tell us it was a cohesive argument? Please feel free to defend an promote his tripe.

If you actually have a position which you would like to advance, how about posting it in your words rather than resorting to tiresome cut and paste productions.

Your ineffectual and boring clap-trap serves little purpose. Seize the issue, if you can, and engage in an intellectual debate.

Come on....
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 May, 2006 02:40 am
Some more interesting material that I should be interested to hear commented upon rationally


Snow repeated falsehoods, offered new one in attempt to rebut Media Matters
Summary: On his radio show, Fox News host Tony Snow made false claims while attempting to rebut items on Media Matters' April 19 list of "the many falsehoods of Tony Snow."
On the April 20 broadcast of his Fox News Radio show, host Tony Snow made several false claims while attempting to rebut items from Media Matters for America's April 19 list of "numerous false and misleading claims advanced by Snow as a Fox News commentator." But in responding to the points, read by assistant Sean McGrane (ph), Snow repeated his previous false or misleading claims. In one case, as a result of a misreading by McGrane, Snow made a new false claim about former CIA operative Valerie Plame.

Snow's assistant misread the first item on Media Matters' list. Media Matters wrote that "Snow falsely asserted that former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV said his wife, Valerie Plame, 'wasn't covert for six years' before she was exposed as a CIA operative by syndicated columnist Robert Novak." But when McGrane read it on the air, he incorrectly said that Media Matters had accused Snow of claiming that Plame herself had said she wasn't covert. From the April 20 broadcast of The Tony Snow Show:

McGRANE: Snow falsely asserted that former ambassador Joe Wilson and his wife, Valerie Plame -- that Plame said "wasn't covert for six years" before she was exposed as a CIA operative.

Snow responded, "Uh, no. That's not what I said. But I did say she was not covert when she was exposed because she had not been on foreign soil for six years." But the claim that "she had not been on foreign soil for six years" is also rebutted by the evidence. As Media Matters has previously noted, evidence indicates that Plame engaged in CIA business abroad between 1998 and 2003, even if she was not stationed abroad. An October 8, 2003, Washington Post article suggested that Plame remained undercover "in recent years" as an "energy consultant," while actually serving as a weapons-proliferation analyst for the CIA. She was known by friends and neighbors as someone who "traveled frequently overseas," according to the Post article. Moreover, on September 29, 2003, CNN national security correspondent David Ensor stated in a report: "All I can say is, my sources tell me that this [Plame] is a CIA operative. This is a person who did run agents. This is a person who was out there in the world collecting information."

Snow repeated his false claim -- also flagged in the April 19 Media Matters item -- that evolution is not scientifically testable. Saying that "we're gonna get nerdy here for a moment," Snow asserted, "If you study the philosophy of science ... you have to be able to conduct like a test-tube experiment. You have to be able to falsify something. The theory of evolution may fit a whole string of facts. But can you do something that demonstrates that apes turned into men? The answer is no, you can't. You can't conduct that experiment. It's humanly impossible. So as a consequence, it's going to remain interesting, it'll remain speculative." He then stated that, similarly, "[y]ou don't have the intelligent-design test tube." As Media Matters noted when it first documented this claim by Snow, the theory of evolution has, in the process of its acceptance by the scientific community, been subject to extensive testing and rigorous scrutiny. Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences (National Academies Press, June 1999), documents more evidence in support of evolution -- such as physical and embryonic similarities among seemingly divergent species. The book also refutes Snow's assertion that evolutionary theory "isn't verifiable or testable." From Science and Creationism:

Evolutionary theory explains that biological diversity results from the descendants of local or migrant predecessors becoming adapted to their diverse environments. This explanation can be tested by examining present species and local fossils to see whether they have similar structures, which would indicate how one is derived from the other. Also, there should be evidence that species without an established local ancestry had migrated into the locality. Wherever such tests have been carried out, these conditions have been confirmed.

Snow also repeated his false criticism in response to Media Matters' claim that "Snow peddled the baseless Republican National Committee talking point that 2004 presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) had blamed U.S. troops for the explosives looted from the Al Qaqaa military installation following the invasion of Iraq. Snow said, '[T]he Kerry campaign is not criticizing the president here. They're criticizing our troops.' " Snow said "the whole point" was that Kerry said "they're [the administration] guilty of malfeasance by letting the weapons get away. Well, you can't say that I'm criticizing the fact that the weapons got away and not criticize the people who let the weapons get away, in your opinion. You can't say that George Bush was standing right there."

But, as Media Matters noted, Kerry did in fact blame the administration and not the military personnel who were there: "After being warned about the danger of major stockpiles of explosives in Iraq," Kerry said, "this administration failed to guard those stockpiles -- where nearly 380 tons of highly explosive weapons were kept."

As the October 25, 2004, The New York Times reported, the administration was repeatedly warned about Al Qaqaa being left unguarded -- but did nothing about it:

The International Atomic Energy Agency publicly warned about the danger of these explosives [at Al Qaqaa] before the war, and after the invasion it specifically told United States officials about the need to keep the explosives secured, European diplomats said in interviews last week. Administration officials say they cannot explain why the explosives were not safeguarded, beyond the fact that the occupation force was overwhelmed by the amount of munitions they found throughout the country.

From the April 20 broadcast of Fox News Radio's The Tony Snow Show:

McGRANE: And, then, finally -- well, two quick ones if we have time. Media Matters lists the many falsehoods of Tony Snow.

SNOW: Oh yeah, I love this one. I love this one.

McGRANE: You want to hear a couple of your falsehoods? Or is that --

SNOW: Yeah, actually -- because I've actually -- what's happened is, the creative readers of that site have actually been thoughtful enough to cut and paste the entire thing for me.

McGRANE: Oh, really?

SNOW: Yeah, so --

McGRANE: The vast list of your falsehoods.

SNOW: The vast list of falsehoods. So let's, yeah, let's hear some of those, and then we're gonna take a break and I will share with you some of the emails too.

McGRANE: "From his statement that evolutionary theory is a 'hypothesis' to his defense of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, Media Matters for America has documented numerous false and misleading claims advanced by Snow as a Fox News commentator" --

SNOW: Wow. That's dangerous. Let's hear them.

McGRANE: -- including "Snow falsely asserted that former ambassador Joe Wilson and his wife, Valerie Plame -- that Plame said 'wasn't covert for six years' before she was exposed as a CIA operative."

SNOW: Uh, no. That's not what I said. But I did say that she was not covert when she was exposed because she had not been on foreign soil for six years.

[...]

McGRANE: "Snow put forward numerous falsehoods to argue that 'evolutionary theory, like intelligent design, isn't verifiable or testable. It's pure hypothesis.' "

SNOW: Yeah, well, here's --

McGRANE: Don't they call it the theory of evolution?

SNOW: Well, here's the deal. In science -- if you study the philosophy of science -- we're gonna get nerdy here for a moment. You have to be able to conduct like a test-tube experiment. You have to be able to falsify something. The theory of evolution may fit a whole string of facts. But can you do something that demonstrates that apes turned into men? The answer's no, you can't. You can't conduct that experiment. It's humanly impossible. So as a consequence, it's gonna remain interesting, it'll remain speculative. Similarly with an intelligent design. I mean, intelligent design says, there's a design behind everything. Well, yeah, OK, we seem to have natural laws and all that that seem to vindicate it, but, you can't prove it. You don't have the intelligent-design test tube. That's all I was saying.

McGRANE: "Snow peddled the baseless RNC talking point that 2004 presidential candidate John Kerry had blamed U.S. troops for the explosives looted from the Al Qaqaa military installation following the invasion of Iraq. Snow said, '[T]he Kerry campaign is not criticizing the president here. They're criticizing our troops.' "

SNOW: OK, well, John Kerry says that they're guilty of malfeasance by letting the weapons get away. Well, you can't say that I'm criticizing the fact that the weapons got away and not criticize the people who let the weapons get away, in your opinion. You can't say that George Bush was standing right there, that was the whole point. Here's -- that's pretty weak stuff.

McGRANE: Yeah, there's not a whole lot here. I hope maybe they're saving their best stuff for if you do decide to do it.

SNOW: Somebody's going to read through all these columns, they're going to find out -- Remember, you said this about the president? I'll just have to say, yeah, sure do.

McGRANE: You can blame -- blame that on [producer] Griff [Jenkins].



http://mediamatters.org/items/200604210001



Original criticisms from Media matters:

The many falsehoods of Tony Snow
Summary: Media Matters for America presents a compilation of false and misleading claims advanced by Tony Snow -- a Fox News Radio host, Fox News guest host and commentator, and former speechwriter to President George H.W. Bush -- who is reportedly being considered by the White House to replace outgoing press secretary Scott McClellan.
The White House is reportedly considering Fox News' Tony Snow to replace outgoing White House press secretary Scott McClellan. White House officials recently spoke with Snow "to see if he would be interested in the job," according to The New York Times. Snow is the host of Fox News Radio's The Tony Snow Show, a regular commentator and guest host on Fox News, and a former speechwriter to President George H.W. Bush.

From his statement that evolutionary theory is a "hypothesis" to his defense of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, Media Matters for America has documented numerous false and misleading claims advanced by Snow as a Fox News commentator:

Snow falsely asserted that former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV said his wife, Valerie Plame, "wasn't covert for six years" before she was exposed as a CIA operative by syndicated columnist Robert Novak.
Snow put forward numerous falsehoods to argue that "[e]volutionary theory, like ID [intelligent design], isn't verifiable or testable. It's pure hypothesis."
Snow claimed that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the "most liberal justice in American history," despite evidence to the contrary.
Snow peddled the baseless Republican National Committee talking point that 2004 presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) had blamed U.S. troops for the explosives looted from the Al Qaqaa military installation following the invasion of Iraq. Snow said, "[T]he Kerry campaign is not criticizing the president here. They're criticizing our troops."
Following President Bush's lead, Snow distorted Kerry's stated desire to reduce terrorism to a "horrible nuisance." Snow claimed Kerry had "called terrorists a nuisance."
Snow backed Swift Boat Veterans for Truth's attacks on Kerry, falsely claiming, "[T]here has been no documentary contradiction of the Swift Boat stuff."
Snow falsely defended Bush from probing questions regarding his National Guard service.



You need to go to the url to follow links to quotes:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200604190003

Criticisms re his facts on Plame:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200604190003

Snow on evolution:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200508120008

More:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507040002


http://mediamatters.org/items/200411020004


http://mediamatters.org/items/200411020004


http://mediamatters.org/items/200410130005


http://mediamatters.org/items/200410120007



http://mediamatters.org/items/200409100001


Hmmmm....

http://mediamatters.org/items/200604250008
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 May, 2006 02:46 am
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
Dlowan to the rescue of her fellow tool!

Bi-po presented a diatribe. Do you really want to tell us it was a cohesive argument? Please feel free to defend an promote his tripe.

If you actually have a position which you would like to advance, how about posting it in your words rather than resorting to tiresome cut and paste productions.

Your ineffectual and boring clap-trap serves little purpose. Seize the issue, if you can, and engage in an intellectual debate.

Come on....



Ah...and you, of course, showed the way to a better and more gracious level of debate.



Oddly enough, Finn, and I know this is a novelty for your world view, I actually told the truth.


I have no knowledge of this Snow fella, though I am suspicious of him as a tool of the current administration.


I am interested if you are able to, on a rational basis, assert whether he is a journalist of note, or a spineless lackey.


You APPEARED to be defending him in that whatever the hell it was you deposited.....are you doing so?

Do you think him a person of journalistic repute?


If not, why so enbiled?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 May, 2006 04:16 am
Ah Finn honey, I don't think you love me. Crying or Very sad

Here is the position I advance. Tony Snow has spoken about your daddy bush like he was ****.... which he is as far as I'm concerned and then takes a job as his chief defender and mouthpiece. I smell pussy. Sell out pussy. There are many who will put it more graciously, but none more accurately.

If you don't like it or me that changes nothing although it does crush my self esteem and make me want to cry. Have a nice day sweetie.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 May, 2006 04:35 am
PS I like the idea of seizing an issue and engaging in intellectual debate....too bad the jerk offs in bushco have never taken your advice.... we might not be in the fix we're in today :wink:
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 May, 2006 04:53 am
Dear Mr. Finn D'Lemming

I offer this as a perfect example of the outcome of one of bushcos intellectual debates and seizing of matters at hand..... Laughing

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12652460/
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 May, 2006 04:57 am
edgarblythe wrote:
Them Iranians are training intercontinental ballistic missiles on your grannie's house as we speak.


the laughs on them... grannie's already in heaven.... with 72 Chippendale Dancers
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 May, 2006 05:27 am
The running gag re Snow's appointment relates to whether or not the White House will be awarding him back-pay.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 May, 2006 01:16 am
I didn't know President Bush was Finn d' Abuzz's father? Why is Finn then wasting time posting on these threads? Or is the last poster just blowing smoke?

If Snow is as bad as dlowan says he is, I am sure that he will help President Bush as much as Sandy Berger helped President Clinton. But maybe Snow won't get caught stealing. Berger must really have been stupid.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 May, 2006 01:19 am
The idea that back-pay would be given to Mr.Snow is, of course, ludicrous. It has been clearly documented that Mr. Clinton did not give any back pay to Hillary when she handled the abortive "health reform" debacle.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 May, 2006 05:06 am
Quote:
Why is Finn then wasting time posting on these threads?

This begs a related question.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 May, 2006 07:50 am
BernardR wrote:
I didn't know President Bush was Finn d' Abuzz's father? Why is Finn then wasting time posting on these threads? Or is the last poster just blowing smoke?
If Snow is as bad as dlowan says he is, I am sure that he will help President Bush as much as Sandy Berger helped President Clinton. But maybe Snow won't get caught stealing. Berger must really have been stupid.


Thank you for that question Captain Literal.... remember there are no stupid questions...... no really.... honestly.....
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 May, 2006 07:55 am
Of course Finn is his son. Only those genes could produce some of his responses.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 May, 2006 08:05 am
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

If you actually have a position which you would like to advance, how about posting it in your words rather than resorting to tiresome cut and paste productions.


I believe her position is, according to the first post, that Snow is already a lying sack of **** and that no great transformation will take place before Monday.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Tony Snow Prediction
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/24/2024 at 03:15:06