Walter Hinteler wrote:ebrown_p wrote:squinney wrote:
You persist in making statements that indicate I'm not compassionate, understanding and am racist / do not want diversity. That's ridiculous. The people of Dulfar...
You are making statements that indicate you are not compassionate.
You want to punish people I care about by insisting on uprooting their lives. You want to give spouses the choice of either leaving lives and careers or breaking up their families. You want to pull kids from school and send kids who have grown up here and are Americans in every way except a sheet of paper to what is to them a foreign country.
You are willing to do these things because either they or their parents broke the law by crossing a border or overstaying a visa. Even though you accept that when Americans break the law, it is sometimes a good thing to offer compassion and understanding.
We are not talking about people in Darfor (although I would love to be able to help). We are talking about people who are living with us and working for us.
But the Senate Bill is offering the border security.
If you care about border security then you will support the Senate bill. If you care about punishing people who you resent being here you will support blocking it.
Where does the above indicate what you conclude as being a logic of it, Foxfyre?
eBrown has said that Squinney (and I) lack compassion because we do not agree with his opinions on the best way to deal with illegal immigration.
I was simply showing how this kind of logic can be used conversely.
The difference is I don't pretend to know eBrown's mind, wishes, or motives and take what he has posted at face value. He however, like some others, seems to have some kind of clarvoiyant powers into the minds of others that those who disagree with him lack.
And then there are those who just wish to cast aspersions on others and make no effort whatsoever to substantiate their opinions. Those I can mostly ignore, however.