50
   

What should be done about illegal immigration?

 
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 10:33 am
Thomas wrote:
So I take it your answer to my question is: "Yes, I would find it acceptable if Albuquerque confined German immigrants to the back of its buses."

That's interesting.


Language barriers and culture differences aside, I cannot in my wildest imaginations figure out how you possibly extracted that from anything I said.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 10:34 am
Thomas wrote:

That's interesting.


But actually she always follows that general line - mostly more politely circumscribing it, though.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 10:38 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Thomas wrote:

That's interesting.


But actually she always follows that general line - mostly more politely circumscribing it, though.


If you are going to deal in ad hominems, Walter, please be more specific. Exactly how do I do that?
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 10:41 am
Foxfyre wrote:
Thomas wrote:
So I take it your answer to my question is: "Yes, I would find it acceptable if Albuquerque confined German immigrants to the back of its buses."

That's interesting.


Language barriers and culture differences aside, I cannot in my wildest imaginations figure out how you possibly extracted that from anything I said.

It flows quite naturally from your rhetorical question: "What fundamental right is there to sit in any particular place on a bus?", your assertion that citizenship makes a difference, and the fact that German immigrants are citizens of Germany, not America. (I should probably have made that clearer in my hypothetical. In fact, I should have used a German tourist.)

Moreover, a look into the 14th Amendment should convince you that the equal protection of the law is not confined to citizens. The amendment reads in relevant part: "[N]or shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Note: "person", not "citizen".
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 10:44 am
Foxfyre wrote:

If you are going to deal in ad hominems, Walter, please be more specific. Exactly how do I do that?


Nothing at "ad hominem" - I just think that you indeed have a great talent to write a 'weaker' form of what you actually think.

My opinion, based on what I read .... and, of course, admittingla how I read it.

I'm most certainly not as religious as you are, but as a Christian I can't tolerate a couple of things, neither here (and that's where I'm predominantly active) nor elsewhere (which I can't change but only discuss).
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 10:47 am
Additionally to the 14th Amendment - see Thomas' response above - the USA have signed and ratified treaties which say different.

And actually that's what they always critised in other countried, see e.g. the annual State Department's reports about it.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 10:54 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:

If you are going to deal in ad hominems, Walter, please be more specific. Exactly how do I do that?


Nothing at "ad hominem" - I just think that you indeed have a great talent to write a 'weaker' form of what you actually think.

My opinion, based on what I read .... and, of course, admittingla how I read it.

I'm most certainly not as religious as you are, but as a Christian I can't tolerate a couple of things, neither here (and that's where I'm predominantly active) nor elsewhere (which I can't change but only discuss).


And for you to assume, say, or speculate on what "I actually think" as opposed to what I say is not ad hominem? You certainly have a different definition of ad hominem than I do.

I don't see what being Christian or not has to do with powers to determine the mind of another. My opinion is that I have no power to say what 'you really think" as opposed to what you actually say. I also think that is a pretty good principle to follow.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 10:59 am
Okay, you are right.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 11:05 am
Thomas wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Thomas wrote:
So I take it your answer to my question is: "Yes, I would find it acceptable if Albuquerque confined German immigrants to the back of its buses."

That's interesting.


Language barriers and culture differences aside, I cannot in my wildest imaginations figure out how you possibly extracted that from anything I said.

It flows quite naturally from your rhetorical question: "What fundamental right is there to sit in any particular place on a bus?", your assertion that citizenship makes a difference, and the fact that German immigrants are citizens of Germany, not America. (I should probably have made that clearer in my hypothetical. In fact, I should have used a German tourist.)

Moreover, a look into the 14th Amendment should convince you that the equal protection of the law is not confined to citizens. The amendment reads in relevant part: "[N]or shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Note: "person", not "citizen".


It doesn't flow naturally at all. I don't have the right to demand a particular seat on a bus and neither do you as a German tourist. And neither does somebody here illegally. I think I made it clear that I would consider it very bad manners to send Germans or any other tourists to the back of the bus as a matter of policy. Where any legalities would come in there, I'm not sure, but you could be right that our courts would rule in your favor if you pushed the issue. Where I objected was in your assumption that I would think it was okay. I did not say that, imply that, or leave any question about that.

The 14th amendment does not protect illegals in all cases however. In your earlier example of requirements for your green card, you are not automatically entitled to all benefits of U.S. citizenship. Also, the U.S. government cannot deport me however, as a U.S. citizen just because I break the law. The government, however, can immediately deport an illegal whether or not he breaks the same law I broke. So there are exceptions to 'equal treatment' between citizens and non citizens.

The bottom line, according to Findlaw, is that everybody in the same circumstances is entitled to equal protection under the law; not necessarily that everybody is treated the same in all circumstances.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 11:09 am
ebrown_p wrote:
This argument is a political battle between two groups of Americans... those who are promoting law and order and harsh penalties, and those who are asking for understanding, compassion and a respect for diversity.....

But your side can't even get HR4437 passed. It is not the "illegals" (who can't even vote) who are stopping this bill, it is the fact that many Americans want their country to be a place of compassion and understanding.

You and I have apparently have different views of what values America should hold to, and this means that we will have the political struggle that we are now engaged in...



You persist in making statements that indicate I'm not compassionate, understanding and am racist / do not want diversity. That's ridiculous. The people of Dulfar are being murdered by the thousands. How about if it were 12 million of them coming into the US without any knowledge of who they are? Would you fight passionately for them to be allowed to stay? And, then 12 million Chinese coming by boatloads and unchecked flight records due to an opressive government? And, 12 million Iraqi's escaping chaos, are you gonna voice your compassion for them so they can all stay?

Is that the only compassionate, understanding and non-racist answer to the problems of the world? Or, would we all be better off dealing with the issues so they can have the lives they dream of in their own country?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 11:27 am
squinney wrote:
ebrown_p wrote:
This argument is a political battle between two groups of Americans... those who are promoting law and order and harsh penalties, and those who are asking for understanding, compassion and a respect for diversity.....

But your side can't even get HR4437 passed. It is not the "illegals" (who can't even vote) who are stopping this bill, it is the fact that many Americans want their country to be a place of compassion and understanding.

You and I have apparently have different views of what values America should hold to, and this means that we will have the political struggle that we are now engaged in...


You persist in making statements that indicate I'm not compassionate, understanding and am racist / do not want diversity. That's ridiculous. The people of Dulfar are being murdered by the thousands. How about if it were 12 million of them coming into the US without any knowledge of who they are? Would you fight passionately for them to be allowed to stay? And, then 12 million Chinese coming by boatloads and unchecked flight records due to an opressive government? And, 12 million Iraqi's escaping chaos, are you gonna voice your compassion for them so they can all stay?

Is that the only compassionate, understanding and non-racist answer to the problems of the world? Or, would we all be better off dealing with the issues so they can have the lives they dream of in their own country?


Well said, Squinney. Our focus and emphasis should be on encouraging the rest of the world to come up with a system or systems that would promote peace, freedom, prosperity, and opportunity for the people wherever they are. The U.S. could take in all the world's poor, but in the process would lose the very qualities that make people want to be here. I can't see how that would benefit anybody.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 12:20 pm
In my opinion, if the GOP is sunk in November, it will be because the House caved in and mostly accepted the Senate bill as presented. Right now there is no indication the House is prepared to cave though.

May 26, 2006, 9:08 a.m.
Temporary MadnessSOURCE
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 12:26 pm
The first sentence from Fox's post, above:
The Senate isn't serious about enforcing the nation's immigration laws.

That's been my message all along; the congress and our government hasn't taken responsibility for illegal immigration. That's the crux and bottom line on this issue.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 12:27 pm
All the laws congress makes on illegal immigration doesn't amount to a hill of beans until they enforce what they make into law.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 12:28 pm
All they're doing now is producing phart.
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 12:28 pm
The Minutemen are serious. Right now, they're busy building part of the fence.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 12:58 pm
squinney wrote:

You persist in making statements that indicate I'm not compassionate, understanding and am racist / do not want diversity. That's ridiculous. The people of Dulfar...



You are making statements that indicate you are not compassionate.

You want to punish people I care about by insisting on uprooting their lives. You want to give spouses the choice of either leaving lives and careers or breaking up their families. You want to pull kids from school and send kids who have grown up here and are Americans in every way except a sheet of paper to what is to them a foreign country.

You are willing to do these things because either they or their parents broke the law by crossing a border or overstaying a visa. Even though you accept that when Americans break the law, it is sometimes a good thing to offer compassion and understanding.

We are not talking about people in Darfor (although I would love to be able to help). We are talking about people who are living with us and working for us.

But the Senate Bill is offering the border security.

If you care about border security then you will support the Senate bill. If you care about punishing people who you resent being here you will support blocking it.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 01:12 pm
If we use your logic eBrown we will have to conclude:

a) You want as many illegals to move here as want to move here
b) You don't want the government to do anything to stop them or do anything but welcome them with open arms when they come
c) You don't mind that hard working people who have played by the rules all their lives are, against their choice, having to support many of the illegals who get here
d) You don't mind that hospitals close emergency room and deny everybody emergency care because they can no longer afford to provide free services for so many
e) You don't care that all students suffer from so many special needs kids who can't speak any English being admitted to the schools to receive a free education
f) You don't care that 40 to 60% of the prison populations of the border states are made up of illegals who have committed serious crimes
g) You don't care if a few terrorists slip across the border along with ordinary people
h) You don't mind if a few more tons of illegal drugs are brought into the country and peddled to your kids
i) It's okay with you that wages are artificially depressed in industries where large numbers of illegals are working
j) You don't care if the United States becomes just another overpopulated, under resourced third world country unable to take care of its own people, much less able to help out others in time of need.
k) You don't care that those who have played by the rules to immigrate legally are punished while illegal activity is rewarded.

Or maybe you don't want all this, but just don't want to see that everybody here wants the best solutions and are looking for the best way to accomplish them. Making negative personal assumptions about those with whom you disagree simply is not useful or constructive to the debate.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 01:20 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
If we use your logic eBrown we will have to conclude:

a) You want as many illegals to move here as want to move here
b) You don't want the government to do anything to stop them or do anything but welcome them with open arms when they come
c) You don't mind that hard working people who have played by the rules all their lives are, against their choice, having to support many of the illegals who get here
d) You don't mind that hospitals close emergency room and deny everybody emergency care because they can no longer afford to provide free services for so many
e) You don't care that all students suffer from so many special needs kids who can't speak any English being admitted to the schools to receive a free education
f) You don't care that 40 to 60% of the prison populations of the border states are made up of illegals who have committed serious crimes
g) You don't care if a few terrorists slip across the border along with ordinary people
h) You don't mind if a few more tons of illegal drugs are brought into the country and peddled to your kids
i) It's okay with you that wages are artificially depressed in industries where large numbers of illegals are working
j) You don't care if the United States becomes just another overpopulated, under resourced third world country unable to take care of its own people, much less able to help out others in time of need.
k) You don't care that those who have played by the rules to immigrate legally are punished while illegal activity is rewarded.

Or maybe you don't want all this, but just don't want to see that everybody here wants the best solutions and are looking for the best way to accomplish them. Making negative personal assumptions about those with whom you disagree simply is not useful or constructive to the debate.

Unsubstantianted hyperbole to the max. This above screed resounds of "the commies are coming if not already hiding under your bed."
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 01:32 pm
Please feel free so show your documentation where any of the scenarios listed have not happened. I don't expect anyone to prove what eBrown does or does not want despite his many attempts to assert what others do or do not want.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 06/28/2025 at 09:14:19