50
   

What should be done about illegal immigration?

 
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 08:13 pm
You mean reside illegally?
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 09:29 pm
Avatar ADV wrote:
But an illegal immigrant is starting from a completely different position - that the law should, in fact, be ignored whenever it's inconvenient.


I think it has to do with a hell of lot more than inconvenience. Being poor is certainly inconvenient, but that's an understatement. And I think it's fairly safe to say that most illegal immigrants come because they are poor and there isn't really a way to come here legally when you don't have any money.

But that doesn't have a lot to do with the point you were making about schools, which after all, would be valid even if the immigrants were legal, right? So let's frame this debate for what it is. We have a problem dealing with the influx, period. Let's not pretend to be all up in arms because somebody walked across a line when somewhere it's written that they're not allowed to.
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 09:41 pm
Avatar ADV wrote:
The cost of fire protection doesn't radically increase with more immigrants, legal or non. Nor police protection, really, any more than an increase in population on the same part of the socio-economic scale (which is to say, dirt poor).


Right, police and fire protection, along with courts, parks, sanitation, and food safety and health inspections are considered population-based programs and generally provide services to a whole group or community.

Studying the fiscal costs of immigration, the National Academy of Sciences uses the term "congestible goods", showing that when the population increases (much like adding a lot of kids to the school system) and service remains fixed, a program will become "congested".

The remedy would be adding more police and firefighters, much like the schools would have to add more teachers to keep pace with a large influx of immigrants.
0 Replies
 
Avatar ADV
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 May, 2007 11:34 pm
Right, but while you can just add another firefighter, it's harder to just add teachers (and to a lesser extent, police officers.) Specifically, you don't just need another warm body - you need another warm body who speaks Spanish, which is substantially more expensive.

Teaching (and police work, and a whole lot of other government services) become more difficult when people don't speak the language. It's even more difficult when you're dealing with people who can't give you basic information - like "where do you live"?

The idea that illegal immigrants don't do certain things because they're poor is only half correct. A big part of the problem is that they have trouble investing in the expenses that make people able to take care of themselves, more or less - precisely because of their illegal status, they simply can't spend money on things where they might need to resort to the judicial system in order to gain the benefits. So an illegal immigrant would, in some ways, be stupid to pay for car insurance - there's no guarantee that it would pay them even if they did, and every chance that instead of paying them, their company would just call up Immigration and say "hey, these guys need to be deported". Same for health insurance. Same for retirement savings. Even something as simple as getting a bank account is pretty tricky if you're working off forged ID papers...

Legal immigrants don't have that problem - they have legitimate ID, no reason to hide from people, access to the judicial system, access to jobs that allow them to move up in life. The government gets to know that hey, there's this guy there, which is useful for all sorts of applications, from allocating expenses to being able to phone his next of kin if he turns up dead in an alley somewhere.

In a very real way, it would help significantly if we had the same number of immigrants each year, but all of them legal, instead of some legal and some other amount illegal. This is one of the reasons amnesty would genuinely have a positive effect - granted that we're not going to deport them all, it's actually quite counterproductive to have a huge illegal population sitting around.

Negative effect of amnesty, of course, is the encouragement to the next batch - "come on and hang on until there's enough of you to force another amnesty", and this ain't the first one in that cycle. If I had any confidence that we'd actually get our heads together on border security, I'd say it's worth it - it's a whole lot less disruptive to catch an illegal immigrant at or near the border, rather than wait until they've settled down.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 08:05 am
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 08:28 am
Avatar ADV wrote:
But an illegal immigrant is starting from a completely different position - that the law should, in fact, be ignored whenever it's inconvenient.

I agree an illegal immigrant is starting from a different position. That position would be "you can't play by the rules if the rules say you can't play." That's why I detest poor Mexicans illegaly immigrating about as much as black seamstresses illegally sitting in the middle of the bus in 1955 Montgomery.

The same is not true for Germans, where US immigration rules say "you can play, and here is how to play ...". That's why I, being a middle-class German immigrant and not a poor Mexican immigrant, play by the rules. Because America lets me. There are qualifications unworthy of going into here. But this is the big difference between rules that say you can play and rules that say you can't.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 08:37 am
I have one question to ask. i dont even need you to answer turthfully.

If YOU were born in mexico, would you stay there living in filth, or break a law and swim your ass across a river to a higher standard of living and a government not corrupt beyond belief?

i bet every person that is pro-deportation totally evades the question.

but do you best to keep people from living better lives.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 08:59 am
OGIONIK wrote:
I have one question to ask. i dont even need you to answer turthfully.

If YOU were born in mexico, would you stay there living in filth, or break a law and swim your ass across a river to a higher standard of living and a government not corrupt beyond belief?

i bet every person that is pro-deportation totally evades the question.

but do you best to keep people from living better lives.


If you were born in poverty and there was close by a very rich person living in a mansion. Would you break into his house and set up housekeeping? If you did what would you expect to happen. You would be given squatters rights or get booted out on your ass.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 09:03 am
lol, that is question evasion my friend. what i would do is ROB THAT ************. i dont like starving.

mansion? country? two different things my friend.

I think what would happen is that the person who owned the mansion, would simply ask me to clean his house for under the table wages.
using my creative imagination like you, im sure you understand my reply.

ty for proving me right though.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 09:07 am
au1929 wrote:
Browne
What next should we afford those who arrived in the US like thieves in the night. The benefits of Affirmative Action?


You can be sure that the illegals will include affirmative action as part of their RIGHTS. Further, we shouldn't be surprised when they mount major civil disruption, similar to what the French experienced.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 09:14 am
The term "La Raza" has its origins in early 20th century Latin American literature and translates into English most closely as "the people," or, according to some scholars, "the Hispanic people of the New World." The term was coined by Mexican scholar José Vasconcelos to reflect the fact that the people of Latin America are a mixture of many of the world's races, cultures, and religions. Some people have mistranslated "La Raza" to mean "The Race," implying that it is a term meant to exclude others. In fact, the full term coined by Vasconcelos, "La Raza Cósmica," meaning the "cosmic people," was developed to reflect not purity but the mixture inherent in the Hispanic people. This is an inclusive concept, meaning that Hispanics share with all other peoples of the world a common heritage and destiny.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 09:16 am
THE COMING
U.S.-MEXICO
BORDER WARS

Revealed...A series of falling dominoes: Mexican oil exports grind to a
halt...collapsing the Mexican economy...forcing a surge of Mexicans across
the Rio Grande...setting off a shooting war - with the U.S. Border Patrol
caught in the middle.

It's just one dimension of a New Energy Crisis unfolding around the world,
a crisis that could send oil soaring to $150 a barrel - and beyond. But
here are six strategies that could protect you now...offering gains of
135%...181%...250%...and more!

Dear Informed American:

Imagine a day - not long from now - when Mexico, America's No. 2 oil
supplier, cuts off its oil to the United States. 15.4% of U.S. imports,
simply gone.

As bad as that is for the U.S. economy, it's even worse for Mexico - with
millions of Mexican jobs lost forever.

Then imagine Mexico torn apart by vicious turf wars over its other
precious export commodity - illegal drugs.

Thousands of people die as rival gangs turn entire neighborhoods into
battle zones. Mexican families literally run for their lives, fleeing
their homes, never to return.

Imagine Mexico further torn apart as the loser of the presidential
election refuses to concede ...even "appointing" his own "cabinet" - and
commanding the loyalty of millions of his countrymen, months after the
election was decided. Mexicans panicked by the prospect of civil war look
around for a refuge.

And then...Imagine all of these crises driving millions of Mexicans to
sneak into the United States illegally - overwhelming the numbers already
arriving.

And waiting for them at the border - thousands of self-styled militia
determined to keep them out at all costs.

One day soon, we won't have to imagine. Some of this is reality already,
even if it's not front-page news. And the rest of it is shaping up to be
reality very soon.

Now let me be clear...Mexican President Felipe Calderon won't actually cut
off oil to the United States.

But he might as well...because the day is coming when Mexico will simply
run out of oil to export.

This will absolutely crater Mexico's economy, driving tens of thousands of
desperate people to the U.S. border.

Calderon knows all of this...He just won't say so.
--dailyreckoning.com
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 09:33 am
OGIONIK wrote:
lol, that is question evasion my friend. what i would do is ROB THAT ****. i dont like starving.

mansion? country? two different things my friend.

I think what would happen is that the person who owned the mansion, would simply ask me to clean his house for under the table wages.
using my creative imagination like you, im sure you understand my reply.

ty for proving me right though.


No evasion but a perfect analogy. As for would I act like the theives who came in the night or made an effort to improve conditions in my own country I can not say.
I could never understand how the people in the US were able to create a nation as great as the US,,when those people south of our border could not even create a livable one. Is it the water?
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 09:37 am
au1929 wrote:
If you were born in poverty and there was close by a very rich person living in a mansion. Would you break into his house and set up housekeeping? If you did what would you expect to happen. You would be given squatters rights or get booted out on your ass.

This is a bad analogy to the extent that they are paying for their rent, and working for their pay. Would you be fine if the state simply stopped providing schooling, social security and such, but did let them stay?
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 09:41 am
dyslexia wrote:
The term "La Raza" has its origins in early 20th century Latin American literature and translates into English most closely as "the people," or, according to some scholars, "the Hispanic people of the New World." The term was coined by Mexican scholar José Vasconcelos to reflect the fact that the people of Latin America are a mixture of many of the world's races, cultures, and religions. Some people have mistranslated "La Raza" to mean "The Race," implying that it is a term meant to exclude others. In fact, the full term coined by Vasconcelos, "La Raza Cósmica," meaning the "cosmic people," was developed to reflect not purity but the mixture inherent in the Hispanic people. This is an inclusive concept, meaning that Hispanics share with all other peoples of the world a common heritage and destiny.


The link to that definition is from the FAQ on La Raza's website.

Babelfish translates it (Spanish to English) as "The Race".
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 09:55 am
Thomas
Question, If you owned the mansion would you invite them to stay or toss them out?
As for paying for their stay. That is indeed questionable. Based upon all the burden they place the areas in which they live. In many instances it is negative balance.
What gauls me most of all is that they have the audacity to demand and demonstrate for their "rights". What imaginary rights do they have?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 10:04 am
HokieBird wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
The term "La Raza" has its origins in early 20th century Latin American literature and translates into English most closely as "the people," or, according to some scholars, "the Hispanic people of the New World." The term was coined by Mexican scholar José Vasconcelos to reflect the fact that the people of Latin America are a mixture of many of the world's races, cultures, and religions. Some people have mistranslated "La Raza" to mean "The Race," implying that it is a term meant to exclude others. In fact, the full term coined by Vasconcelos, "La Raza Cósmica," meaning the "cosmic people," was developed to reflect not purity but the mixture inherent in the Hispanic people. This is an inclusive concept, meaning that Hispanics share with all other peoples of the world a common heritage and destiny.


The link to that definition is from the FAQ on La Raza's website.

Babelfish translates it (Spanish to English) as "The Race".


La Raza (Mexican Spanish IPA: [la ˈrasa]; Castillian Spanish IPA: [la ˈraza]) is a Spanish-language phrase which, while literally translated as "the race", is more often used as a synonym of "el pueblo" or "la gente", both of which mean "the people".
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 10:22 am
Interesting; sorry I have no Spanish. Although gente (Italian) or gens (French) appear to be related to "la raza", they're obviously different words, whereas "race" is the same word, etymologically speaking.

Is the connotation similar to the German "das Volk"? Same word as the English "folk" but different idea.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 10:35 am
Spanish to German:

la raza = der Menschenschlag (where the German word probably translates, for lack of a better word, to something like "race" in English)(the German word "Rasse" would be the literal translation of the English word "race")

la gente = das Volk


seriously, I think there is really no good term in English for the Spanish word "raza"
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 May, 2007 11:57 am
language is always interesting to those who are rigidly anal. Sometimes americans go to a garage sale but never to buy a garage.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.55 seconds on 09/02/2025 at 11:09:10