I'm very serious, unless you work for the U.N. or perhaps schooled offshore, no citizen of the USA would call central America "middle America". Middle America refers to the heartland, always has. When Bush won his second term, the uber-liberal coastal brats held up their "**** Middle America" signs like the chimps they are.
I certainly can't forget that image.
cjhsa wrote:I'm very serious, unless you work for the U.N. or perhaps schooled offshore, no citizen of the USA would call central America "middle America".
I'm serious here as well: there are online resources, scanned primary sources that is from the 15th century onwards which belie you.
Besides that, are US geography books only edited/published/written by UN staff or persons schooled offshore
cjhsa wrote:Because you don't know what you are talking about.
****, I was backtracking but f--k it. There is no "middle America" other than the midwest. If someone writes it that way intending something else, that is their own stupid ass problem.
I think you wanted to write "I
know no Middle America other than the Midwest"... Fine, too.
However, I looked up the entry for Mexico in the
CIA World Factbook, and, surprise, it says, under "Geography":
The CIA World Factbook wrote:Location: Middle America, bordering the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico, between Belize and the US and bordering the North Pacific Ocean, between Guatemala and the US
Amazing, isn't it? Anyways, I'm always glad to help with your education...
See, oe: even the CIA is undermined by the UN!
There is a notable difference between educable and trainable, there is the distinct possiblity that shiksa is neither.
I suspect that CJ is confusing "Middle America" with the Spanish, which I have always seen written as "Centroamerica"
"...and South America stole our name
let's drop the big one
there'll be no one left to blame us"
blatham wrote:"...and South America stole our name
let's drop the big one
there'll be no one left to blame us"
You mean they also call themselves Vespucciland?
Clearly there is a conspiracy to confuse people about "middle America".
ebrown, when you saw the guy holding up the "F--- Middle America" sign, did you think he was talking about Mexico?
No CJ, I am pretty sure that guy was talking about you.
There is no "middle America" other than the midwest. Statements to the contrary are intended to confuse.
South, Central, and North.
I'd put Mexico in North America. Most Mexicans are already in the States, so this makes sense to claim the land.
I've always been suspicious about the intentions of the CIA, too.
Back on topic, since Mexico and central American doesn't want its own people back, I suggest we deport illegals to England.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006480089,00.html
Quote:"I can confirm we have had five American nationals apply for asylum this year,"
Are you one of them? Or did you apply here in Germany?
No, I plan to move to Mexico and apply there, in English.
If I didn't know better, I would suspect our own ebrown_p was running for office in Colorado! (Note: Ritter is also against the CCW and castle doctrine laws that would allow citizens to protect themselves from these criminals once they were released):
Ritter Admits Aiding Illegal Aliens
Non-deportable plea deals for felons indefensible
October 5 , 2006
ENGLEWOOD, CO - Denver lawyer Bill Ritter is right about one thing: allowing alien felons back on the street after plea bargaining them down to an obscure charge of farmland trespassing in the City and County of Denver is, in Ritter's own words, "a difficult thing to explain to the public."
"I think it's indefensible," said Bob Beauprez.
During a recent 7NEWS debate, Ritter was asked point-blank if it was a mistake to systematically plea bargain alien felons to a farmland trespassing charge so that these criminals could avoid deportation. Instead of answering the question, Ritter admitted that he knowingly kept alien felons from being deported.
"Yes, it helped [alien felons] avoid deportation," Ritter admitted during the debate.
To view a video clip of Ritter's response, click here.
"Bill Ritter's pattern of plea bargaining alien felons, allowing them back on our streets, has left our communities less safe," said Beauprez. "This isn't a difference of opinion. It's just bad judgment."
During the 7NEWS debate, as well as a debate last night hosted by the Associated Governments of Northwest Colorado, Ritter also admitted he wants to gut the recent law passed by the Legislature banning taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal aliens.
When asked about in-state tuition for illegals aliens in violation of current law, Ritter said he supported gutting the law because "I really believe it's the right thing to do."
"He didn't enforce the laws against illegal immigration as Denver DA and he obviously won't enforce the laws against illegal immigration as Governor," said Beauprez. "We simply can't afford his bad judgment."
Obvioulsy, Colorado voters aren't so stupid at all:
Quote:Ritter Opens Up His Lead Over Beauprez In Colorado
October 10, 2006 8:02 p.m. EST
Matthew Borghese - All Headline News Staff Writer
Denver, CO (AHN) - The Colorado gubernatorial race is heating up, as Democrat Bill Ritter begins to widen the gap with voters against Republican Rep. Bob Beauprez.
In a survey conducted by Ciruli Associates, Ritter leads Beauprez 43 percent to 33, yet a full 20 percent of voters remain undecided about the two candidates.
According to the Associated Press, there are about 170,000 more registered Republicans than Democrats in Colorado, but the poll showed Ritter with a 32-percentage-point lead over Beauprez among unaffiliated voters. Ritter also appeared to be doing a better job than Beauprez at attracting voters from the other party, the poll showed. According to the poll, Ritter leads Beauprez in every region of the state except on the eastern plains.
Source
