Quote:
Nope-
I don't live in Yorkshire nor do I come from there.
I assume Mathos is making use of a "literary conceit" which is basically to choose a subject for one's own convenience in order to show oneself in a good light or to show someone else in a bad light. All his literary productions are of that nature so it isn't surprising that he has invented this one. From a literary point of view he is blowing up paper bags in order to burst them and frighten the timid or icing cakes to flatter the feeble minded. They are rather old fashioned and denote an inabilty or inclination to write about the real world in a real way and a delight in writing about one's own thoughts.
If I remember correctly Spendius,
you're the one who initially told me you were from Yorkshire. I can remember Clary asking you at one point why you yourself were so disparaging about where you came from and had chosen to live. I do know what a literary conceit is. It seems that this is the method
you've chosen to employ to blow up paper bags or ice cakes.
Quote:Quote:I don't agree that "a beautiful article which is not expensive is accounted not beautiful."
I didn't say you did agree.
No, you didn't. That's true. Now are you going to say, "I didn't say it
wasn't true?
Quote:From an aesthetic point of view all plants and all animals and all scenery have the same quality of beauty to a scientific temperment. Dandelions being just as beautiful as the rarest and most cultivated of orchids. It follows that a walk up the lane is just as inspiring as a visit to a flower show and much less expensive and enables one to live in better accomodation with the money saved. If I was gardening I would grow potatoes and cabbages and such like.
Tell me, do you speak for all people of scientific temperament? Do none of them have individual taste? Maybe a favorite color, or a tendency to have their eye drawn to a particular shape represented in the natural world that for some inexplicable reason, they just find more pleasing than another? I agree that their innate tendency may be to find beauty in the utilitarian value of plants and accord it equally, but I also think you are denying their innate human-ness to assume that they have the ability to be so impartial.
Quote:What Veblen provides for the attentive reader is a reduction in the taxes levied upon one's ego's peccadilloes which can often run away with one's substance. The irony is often that in the process of wasting money the customer, or punter, seeks it at a bargain price.
Are you in training to become a monk Spendius? Believe me, I have the utmost respect for anyone who can turn away from the temptations of conspicuous and empty consumption that so many of us in this world have adopted as our "religion" or way of life. But, can you explain to me why it's okay for you to spend money at the pub, but not for me to spend money on flowers for my garden?
Quote:beauty is subjective by it's very definition
Which concedes the case. And I don't agree.
Beauty is the perfection of the case and a wild dandelion is likely to be more beautiful than a horticultural production strained through un-natural breeding techniques to flatter those to whom expense is the hallmark by which to measure it.
I don't know how that concedes the case. Maybe you could explain it to me.
If beauty is the perfection of the case - then whose interpretation of perfection are we using by which to measure whether something is beautiful or not? I feel almost certain that what you consider perfect and thus beautiful would be different than what I do. So whose impression is more correct? And why?
Quote:I didn't say that I found Wayne's foot injury important. I said that it was of "grave national importance" which it indubitally is from the evidence of how much it has been discussed. It is of interest to me because he is such a great player and I would like to see him perform on a world stage. I would have the same view about any other great player irrespective of which country he played for. Most players can be replaced easily but that is not the case with a small number of them whose absence would render the World Cup less of a spectacle. The attraction of great spectacles seems to be an objective characteristic of the human race and only members of the awkward squad resist this attraction.
Believe me, I wish Wayne Rooney well. I admire his talent (which has been
cultivated, and probably at great expense, by the way).
You find your great spectacle on the football pitch. I find mine at a flower show. Someone else finds it at a Nascar race. Why is any one any more acceptable than any of the others?
Quote:You might be amazed at the hullaballoo which will take place if England reach the final or even the semi-finals. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if the Government declared a holiday if England win it. They might as well because the people will take one anyway.
I'm aware of that. But interestingly enough, I heard on radio 4 that 80% of people surveyed, (not only managers or bosses) are in favor of repercussions for people who call in sick during the World Cup finals. So to save a lot of sackings, it would be good for them to go ahead and call it a holiday.
Quote:If the moon is considered beautiful for the reason you give then so also is the oxygen in the atmosphere. Anyway tides are quite a nuisance sometimes and I don't think the atmospheric oxygen ever is.
Usefulness= beauty. That was the reason
you gave. I don't know, and I may have this wrong because I don't have the most scientific of temperaments, but I remember something about the pull of the moon giving the earth a slightly oval shape and keeping it tilted on it's axis therebye giving us seasons, etc. Not quite as necessary as atmospheric oxygen, I grant you that, but pretty darn useful, if you ask me.
But then again, it's visible and thus able to have physical beauty ascribed to it, whereas oxygen is not.
Mathos - I know you don't care what color my eyes are. That's why I went into so much detail telling you.
Eat whatever makes you happy Mathos. That's my philosophy when it comes to food.
In terms of my photo - hey you gave me an idea. Maybe I should try to sell it to HP- replace that old tired view of Big Ben they've been using for years- and make a load of money to spend on flowers.
Spendius reveres good thinking. And he finds it in these authors he admires. I think there's a place for that. But I also think there is much to be learned through one's own experience, and it should be considered to be just as valid if not more so when an individual is choosing whose particular wisdom to follow in living his or her own life.
In terms of my abilities as a mother - yes- I feel my children are lucky to have me. I know it might sound boastful- but I am a good mother and I have no trouble admitting that. Thanks again Buddy for all your kind and well-intentioned words.
PS Spendius - there wasn't one word of that that was bollocks.
You guys have a good Bank Holiday Monday. I got sun - how about you?