Rethinking Homosexuality

I'm thinking suicide by certain persons, as a result of some social interaction, could be a blessing for society.

real life wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:

neologist wrote:

God does not forbid homosexuality to deny happiness. He forbids homosexuality because, as our creator, he wishes to keep us from its consequences.

What would those be??

Anon

Well, for one thing, we have been discussing a reduced life expectancy. Try to keep up.

Yes you said that, but provided nothing to support that. I consider it your opinion, not fact. Keep your smug remarks to yourself!!

Anon

dyslexia wrote:

I'm thinking suicide by certain persons, as a result of some social interaction, could be a blessing for society.

And in some cases. a blessing for the person themselves.

Anon

Anon-Voter wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

I'm thinking suicide by certain persons, as a result of some social interaction, could be a blessing for society.

And in some cases. a blessing for the person themselves.

Anon

You are both sad cases.

Wolf O'D has already pointed out that the sole source referred to was a homophobic "scientist" with an agenda, who provided a single study, which was never accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

It is far from true, as "real life" states, that a reduced life expectancy is something "we" have been dicsussing. To proceed from such a premise, "real life" would indeed need to provide a realiable source for the contention, otherwise, we are all entitled to do as AV suggests, and ignore the contention as merely "real life's" unsupported (and likely bigoted) opinion.

real life wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

I'm thinking suicide by certain persons, as a result of some social interaction, could be a blessing for society.

And in some cases. a blessing for the person themselves.

Anon

You are both sad cases.

No, You are sadly misinformed. You also shoot your mouth off when you have little to no facts!!

Anon

To assess how HIV infection and AIDS (HIV/AIDS) impacts on mortality rates for gay and bisexual men.

God does not forbid homosexuality to deny happiness. He forbids homosexuality because, as our creator, he wishes to keep us from its consequences.

Anon-Voter wrote:

real life wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

I'm thinking suicide by certain persons, as a result of some social interaction, could be a blessing for society.

And in some cases. a blessing for the person themselves.

Anon

You are both sad cases.

No, You are sadly misinformed. You also shoot your mouth off when you have little to no facts!!

Anon

I have provided far more documentation (several links to outside sources) of my position than you have (which would be none).

And I maintain that anyone who asserts that suicide as a result of social interaction is a 'blessing' for society, or for the deceased, is an individual with a sick, twisted view of reality.

That would be both of you, assuming you are both ready to defend your statements.

real life wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:

real life wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

I'm thinking suicide by certain persons, as a result of some social interaction, could be a blessing for society.

And in some cases. a blessing for the person themselves.

Anon

You are both sad cases.

No, You are sadly misinformed. You also shoot your mouth off when you have little to no facts!!

Anon

I have provided far more documentation (several links to outside sources) of my position than you have (which would be none).

And I maintain that anyone who asserts that suicide as a result of social interaction is a 'blessing' for society, or for the deceased, is an individual with a sick, twisted view of reality.

That would be both of you, assuming you are both ready to defend your statements.

Setenta has done a fine job of discredting your source, so I don't need to do that. As to suicide, I won't hijack this thread with a diversion from the subject. I will tell you I have personal experience with a family suicide, and have spent a liftime studying it. In short, you know nothing about it!! Don't try to pretend you do!!

Anon

His laughable assertion that any research must include 'all' homosexuals in 'all' demographic areas is as ridiculous as it can be.

By this standard, no research on any subject would be valid unless it covered 100% of the possible subjects of the research.

neologist wrote:

sozobe wrote:

You made the allegations first, real life, support away. All of 'em.

Well, there is a higher incidence of certain STDs and, in male homosexuals, colorectal cancer. Does any of that count?

I'm waiting for the AMA to give homosexual behavior its endorsement.

Never happen.

Neo,

I've had colorectal cancer ... does that mean I'm gay?? Higher incidence of certain STD's?? Well, there's a higher incidence of other certain STD's in hetero-sexual couples ... your point is ???

Anon

real life wrote:

His laughable assertion that any research must include 'all' homosexuals in 'all' demographic areas is as ridiculous as it can be.

By this standard, no research on any subject would be valid unless it covered 100% of the possible subjects of the research.

Yet you are here, commenting on the perceived negatives of a way of life utilizing a study performed on a fragment of those that exercise that lifestyle. The only laughable portion of this debate is that you still stick by that.

Anon-Voter wrote:

neologist wrote:

sozobe wrote:

You made the allegations first, real life, support away. All of 'em.

Well, there is a higher incidence of certain STDs and, in male homosexuals, colorectal cancer. Does any of that count?

I'm waiting for the AMA to give homosexual behavior its endorsement.

Never happen.

Neo,

I've had colorectal cancer ... does that mean I'm gay?? Higher incidence of certain STD's?? Well, there's a higher incidence of other certain STD's in hetero-sexual couples ... your point is ???

Anon

Dana Reeves died of lung cancer at age 44, yet never smoked. Your point is?

I sincerely doubt you have any professional experience or you wouldn't be saying what you are. You're a fraud!

Anon

real life wrote:

His laughable assertion that any research must include 'all' homosexuals in 'all' demographic areas is as ridiculous as it can be.

By this standard, no research on any subject would be valid unless it covered 100% of the possible subjects of the research.

Yet you are here, commenting on the perceived negatives of a way of life utilizing a study performed on a fragment of those that exercise that lifestyle. The only laughable portion of this debate is that you still stick by that.