Lash wrote:I'm proud of his stance--and proud a GOP standing for the big office had it.
And I'm proud of your pride in the one pro-choice Republican.. :wink:
Cycloptichorn wrote:It certainly isn't going to be Romney, who isn't polling well.
I wouldnt count Romney out. I think Giuliani is unlikely to win the primaries when the pro-life militants rally against him, but I dont see McCain winning.. he's by now managed to alienate both ends of his party. Romney has been mostly under the radar so far, but he's been creeping up in the polls gradually but steadily. Plus he's got that creepy combination of smooth exterior and inane ignorance that Republicans go for.
Fred Thompson, little that we know about him, would probably stand a better chance (less luggage), but if he doesnt get in I wouldnt count out Romney at all.
Cycloptichorn wrote:I've heard rumors of a Hagel-Bloomberg ticket. If that happens, you might as well say hello to a Democratic president, b/c it would split your party right down the middle.
Unh-uh. A Bloomberg candidacy would spell trouble primarily for the Democrats. He's only a Republican in name, and the little polling that was done on a possible Presidential run, I seem to remember, showed him attracting Democrats much more than Republicans.
Lash wrote:Only saving grace....? Same on yours.....LOL
I think the Dems' field is pretty strong actually. Muchos better than in '04...
Cycloptichorn wrote:Ought to be interesting, no doubt. I bet Nimh is running around with a half-woody almost every day now.
Only when I imagine Lash's passionate rebuttals.