Finn dAbuzz wrote:Sure, the pundits we're saying that he had an uphill battle, and that McCain's position was pretty solid, but I didn't hear any of them say Romney had no chance [..]
I did. Specifically, I saw an article doing the simple math. Cant find it back, but I can redo the math.
A Republican candidate needs 1,191 delegates to win the nomination.
McCain already has 721.
Romney has 278. So he would have needed to win another 913.
But there are only some 1,165 at stake still...
In short, Romney would have needed to win
78% of all delegates in the upcoming primaries. Keeping McCain and Huckabee down to a
combined 22%.
Rright..
So yes, he had no chance, as the smarter commentators figured out. It wasnt just "an uphill battle" he faced, it was virtually a mathematical impossibility.
The "Radio Conservatives rear action" may well still "have heated up further," yeah, but no, there was no way anymore he could have gotten at all close, let alone "closer still" (whatever that means regarding a guy who's already trailing almost 1:3 in delegates).