Lash wrote:Thomas wrote:Lash wrote:I don't know of any anti-Muslims here.
I've seen a few who call them towelheads. Do they count?
If they are referring to the entire Muslim population, I would think they may count.
If they used ANY word to intentionally demean an entire population of ANY group, that constitutes MY opinion of anti-somebody.
I don't subcribe to the Great Terminology Embargo, as I'm one of the silly ones, who actually thinks the meaning behind a word is what is the best indicator of a person's sentiment. On occasion, a term DOES reflect a racial or ethnic hatred. In MY case, towelhead was used against terrorists, which I said. I used several other words, as well. However, if you'd like to pretend that makes me a racist, you may with my blessings.
OK, the principle - correct me if I'm wrong - the principle behind this argument seems to be that no word should by itself be beyond the pale; and you can therefore use words of the raghead variety as long as you dont intend to demean an entire population group with it. If you intended to demean the entire population group in question, it would be (a variety of) racist, but if you use it to describe particular subsets or individuals it's OK.
Right?
Of course, according to the same logic, I could go around here calling people or groups of people, if not "nigger" (which has a rather unique status), then at least "coon", say - just so long as I would be able to clarify afterward that I didnt mean to be talking about
all blacks, of course. Just those darned <example of specific reprehensible group of black people>,
those be coons! Why should I not be allowed to use that word?
But would that really be where it's at? I mean, would any of you appreciate that, and not consider it wrong or unduly offensive?