0
   

The 'N word' briefly revisited

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 12:40 am
Yeah...who the hell says it "festers"?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 12:43 am
flushd wrote:
I have a totally different experience with the N word.
I rarely hear it coming out of anyone but young white people's mouths around here. And generally, it is said in a "what's up, nigger?" kind of way.
Very suburban-wigger usage. It's like a form of imitation.

I do get uncomfortable when I hear it sometimes though....when it is obvious it is said to put someone down.



Is this white people to whites?


If so, sounds like another "cool black" thing that has become a fashion statement for young whites...like clothing and stuff does.


I am trying to figure out what I think of that...talk about consumerism levelling and rendering everything meaningless...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 12:48 am
soz said
Quote:
So, all white people are inherently racist?

There isn't any room for anything else, there.


Yes, there is actually. The joke, as I understand it (Rock is a distinctly intelligent comic) refers to a particular sense of entitlement in western (and that does mean mainly "white") culture that isn't unlike what one might see in the mindset of, say, a monarch or an aristocrat.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 01:22 am
Let me add a few further thoughts, to clarify my point.

I think that, along with the African American community (whose ancestors were bundled up, transported and sold like so many cattle) this joke might also be resonant with Native Americans. I do find it wonderfully curious that we have all had a bit more trouble getting Rock's "joke" here than has snood, who says it "isn't subtle". Clearly for us it is and that may well be the problem of a fish trying to understand "wet".

None of us (well, except boinkers sorts) hold it as wise or balanced when the Bolton/Bush crowd attempt to bring the UN even further under the domination of one country. But what would be our response if, somehow, the Security Council was dominated by Muslims or Hindus or Buddhists or the Chinese or the Africans, etc? Would it not seem something of a dangerous or unsettling inversion of the proper hierarchy of things?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 04:45 am
blatham wrote:
Let me add a few further thoughts, to clarify my point.

I think that, along with the African American community (whose ancestors were bundled up, transported and sold like so many cattle) this joke might also be resonant with Native Americans. I do find it wonderfully curious that we have all had a bit more trouble getting Rock's "joke" here than has snood, who says it "isn't subtle". Clearly for us it is and that may well be the problem of a fish trying to understand "wet".

None of us (well, except boinkers sorts) hold it as wise or balanced when the Bolton/Bush crowd attempt to bring the UN even further under the domination of one country. But what would be our response if, somehow, the Security Council was dominated by Muslims or Hindus or Buddhists or the Chinese or the Africans, etc? Would it not seem something of a dangerous or unsettling inversion of the proper hierarchy of things?


That makes sense...and that is what I thought it meant.

It seemed/seems to me that Snood is saying something far stronger than that.

Not saying nigger is no different, for me, than not saying any other outrageously hurtful and hateful, or just plain rude, thing.

Fester? Huh?

Why should it fester?


As well say it festers that I can't call clients at work "stupid arsehole" or some such.

I don't know, mebbe it has a power only felt in countries with a history of African slaves being drug there?
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 05:22 am
Your right dlowan. The word Ni**er does have a kind of power here. Words are concepts. No?

The word has an origin here and a history that is still very recent.

Master & slave, subhuman, Dirty, Stupid, Lazy, Genetically inferior. I can't think of any word attributed to any race in any other country that envokes as much as the word ni**er in America and it's still in use just not when the Brothers are around.

Put then I can't say i've really been around the world but I did grow up partially in black ghettos. it's a bad word.
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 05:40 am
Yes dlowan, whites to whites. It's a trendy thing, I guess, and some people think it's cool.

Most of my life has been spent in various parts of Canada, and I have heard the words "indian" and "squaw" etc. etc. used with utter hate. So, I can totally identify with the N word being powerful. I just don't have a lot of first hand experience with it.

p.s. I got the joke, I just didn't think it was that funny. Maybe 'cause it doesn't hit close enough to home for me? Dunno.
Probably that I just prefer other comediens! Laughing
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 05:48 am
Amigo wrote:
Your right dlowan. The word Ni**er does have a kind of power here. Words are concepts. No?

The word has an origin here and a history that is still very recent.

Master & slave, subhuman, Dirty, Stupid, Lazy, Genetically inferior. I can't think of any word attributed to any race in any other country that envokes as much as the word ni**er in America and it's still in use just not when the Brothers are around.

Put then I can't say i've really been around the world but I did grow up partially in black ghettos. it's a bad word.


Oh I know all that. I guess I am thinking mebbe the visceral impact of it doesn't come with knowledge?


It also seems to vary from American to American.

I guess I don't kind of get the "forbidden" aspect of it, any more than other rude and hateful words. I do not get what is supposed to be such a big deal about not being "able" to use it...I get that in a humorous sense...,..... but not being hateful and rude "festering"?


Aargh, I dunno.....I think for some people feeling theirt hatefulness cannot be expressed so freely, and with support from the community, any more DOES fester...it was that kind of pus bursting forth that fueled the backlash here in Oz a while back, as well as in other places. I guess the western world is in the middle of such a response to festering...
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 05:53 am
flushd wrote:
Yes dlowan, whites to whites. It's a trendy thing, I guess, and some people think it's cool.

Most of my life has been spent in various parts of Canada, and I have heard the words "indian" and "squaw" etc. etc. used with utter hate. So, I can totally identify with the N word being powerful. I just don't have a lot of first hand experience with it.

p.s. I got the joke, I just didn't think it was that funny. Maybe 'cause it doesn't hit close enough to home for me? Dunno.
Probably that I just prefer other comediens! Laughing


Hmmm... I wonder (as I said above) if the language is on its way to depowering "nigger"? Making it a mildly attention grabbing word, withut its old power?

Like "naughty" used to mean really sinful, and "nice" meant "subtle; skillful; fastidious, particular about small details" and now means sod all.


What are the implications of that, I wonder?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 06:08 am
deb

I don't see something stronger in snood's posts, other than perhaps a more viserceral distaste for that word when spoken by us paleskins and I know that would be as understandable to you as to me.

When I went back to university the feminist project was concentrating acutely on the sexist components of language. I was entirely sympathetic with the endeavor, if not all of the conclusions and assumptions, and joined in a lot of conversations quite like this one.

I argued then, as I did here earlier, that terms like nigger or fag or girl have to be hijacked by the very people to whom they refer in order for those people to disarm the terms within their own communities - to invert them into signifiers of uniqueness and community bond and pride.

But I went a bit further too, and argued that this inversion/disarming would be assisted if folks like me (white, straight, male) who shared the loathing for the earlier uses of the terms, began to use them (sparingly, pointedly) in the same ways as the minority communities were coming to use them. Tricky stuff. And like always, the 'appropriateness' of what comes out of my mouth is dependent upon who is standing in front of me at that moment.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 06:09 am
Believe it or not dlowan. I understand what you are saying.

I quess maybe we are in the middle of some kind of Politically Correct thing here in the states but if it means we are suppress our true feelings isn't that worse and can't being forced to be politically correct be a form of suppressed speech.

Aargh. Boy you can say that again. Now theres a word with a concept Smile
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 08:18 am
Wow.

Thanks, Blatham. The analogy about fish trying to understand "wet" is effective, for me.
This essay by Tim Wise may be helpful for those with a mind to hear it...
http://www.alternet.org/story/15223/



The "wow' is toward the predictable acrobatics that have gone forth here - "All whites aren't racist!" "What's he really trying to say?!" ""It's a bunch of crap!"

All I said - ALL I said - was a repeat of what Rock said, which I agree with very profoundly. The white angst around the issue of who gets to say the N word, and who doesn't is inextricable from that historic sense of privilege.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 09:13 am
There is a truth here that applies in a general way. Still, not all people are part of it.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 09:35 am
some of us are just too new-agey to understand much of anything.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 09:37 am
Do you agree with this, snood?

blatham wrote:
But I went a bit further too, and argued that this inversion/disarming would be assisted if folks like me (white, straight, male) who shared the loathing for the earlier uses of the terms, began to use them (sparingly, pointedly) in the same ways as the minority communities were coming to use them.


That white people should use "nigger" (if sparingly, and pointedly) in the same ways as black people use it?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 09:42 am
edgarblythe wrote:
There is a truth here that applies in a general way. Still, not all people are part of it.


"Not all" people are a part of ANYTHING much, but thanks for conceding a "general truth".
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 09:51 am
sozobe wrote:
Do you agree with this, snood?

blatham wrote:
But I went a bit further too, and argued that this inversion/disarming would be assisted if folks like me (white, straight, male) who shared the loathing for the earlier uses of the terms, began to use them (sparingly, pointedly) in the same ways as the minority communities were coming to use them.


That white people should use "nigger" (if sparingly, and pointedly) in the same ways as black people use it?


I agree with the thought in its entirety that Blatham was making - you left out some important things, not the least of which were the last two sentences of that paragraph:

Quote:
Tricky stuff. And like always, the 'appropriateness' of what comes out of my mouth is dependent upon who is standing in front of me at that moment.


Rock's statement was simple - and Blatham touched on it in the passage you selectively quoted - namely, whites don't get to decide when or if its cool to use the word, they don't like it, and that angst has to do with their sense of privilege.

Did you read the Tim Wise article, Sozobe?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 09:54 am
dyslexia wrote:
some of us are just too new-agey to understand much of anything.


Aw...diddums get ums feewings hurt?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 09:56 am
Nope, I will do so now.

Your answer to what I quoted is at the center of my objection to Rock's specific formulation, though.

Again, I already said that as a comedian he exaggerates to get the point across, and I take the point in a general way. (This is not a new subject to me.)

You seem to be hewing to every specific, though.

Please answer this question (as you haven't answered the others -- I'll take the answer to just this one).

Do you agree with:

Quote:
But I went a bit further too, and argued that this inversion/disarming would be assisted if folks like me (white, straight, male) who shared the loathing for the earlier uses of the terms, began to use them (sparingly, pointedly) in the same ways as the minority communities were coming to use them.


To put it more simply:

Do you agree that white people can and should use "nigger" (if sparingly and pointedly) in the same ways that black people do?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 10:00 am
I read the article, nice one, thanks. It's all points I have made here at one point or another, discussing affirmative action or use of "nigger" or any number of variations of racism.

I think part of being respectful is not automatically accepting something I don't agree with just because the person who posits it is a person of color. (Note, I don't think blatham is doing it, but I do think he is also doing a bit of a convoluted dance to pick out the things he agrees with.)

My read on this stands -- while there are certainly points to be made about white privilege, and while Chris Rock scored in a general, exaggerated, comedian-speak way, there are things about that statement that break down at the pure language level. It doesn't make sense.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 05/03/2025 at 12:35:10