1
   

Why insulting prophet Muhammad?!

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 03:12 pm
Iraq11 wrote:
During the present campaign of hate against the last and final Messenger Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), Allah gives us signs that we are on the true path.

Here is an example: In town of Waterfoot, near Bury (England), locals flocked to the village's pet shop, Water Aquatic, last week after it was noticed that the markings on the scales of the two-year-old albino Oscar fish mimicked the Arabic script for Allah, and Muhammad on the other side.

Full story from the Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1700465,00.html


Shocked Shocked Razz Laughing
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 03:14 pm
Nimh,

Just be grateful you have no markings on your scales! Very Happy Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 03:17 pm
Good to learn "ordinary muslims" wish to dissociate themselves from incitement to murder. Ellpus is right that there is real fury in London against Muslims who abuse their citizen's rights. What sort of reception would a march openly in favour of Al Qaida and bin Laden get in Manhatten? They called for people who insult Islam to be beheaded. They said more 7/7 bombers were on their way. I just saw Sheik Omar Bakhri (speaking from Lebanon where he fled to mother, and hasnt come back) calling for the trial and execution of cartoonists...when questioned on this, as cartoon drawing is not usually punishable by death in the UK, he said it was permissable under Sharia law...and when it was pointed out English law is not Sharia law the implication was clear...NOT YET.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 03:26 pm
That's the one site of stupidity, Steve.

On the other site I wonder, how many really would follow some others and want to die in the ditch, defending the right to abuse a religious leader with a caricature.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 03:34 pm
Hey, MA, my bubbles are a sign of divinity. If you read 'em right you can tell the future :wink:

I mentioned the Arab-European League earlier, them of the controversial Abou Jahjah.

Jahjah penned a declaration on their website on the matter: Walking the thin line. It starts promisingly:

Quote:
When I first heard about the cartoons that were published in Denmark and Norway representing the prophet Mohamed I honestly didn't think that the issue is worth a debate.

This whole cartoon business is clearly a cheap attempt to upset Muslims, get some controversy and sell more. Muslim-Bashing is nowadays the best way to score, whether politically or economically.

Right on. My opinion exactly. He's right.

He continues still in reasonable fashion:

Quote:
The debate on freedom of speech in this is not what interests me. On that level I do also believe that one must be able of publishing and saying anything. I do not believe in red lines, and I do not believe that anything should be above the freedom of human expression. I know that most Arabs and Muslims would disagree with me on this point, but this is not what bothers me, what bothers me is that most Europeans don't realize that they also disagree with me.

Ok ... dunno if I agree, but, an arguable POV ... but then look what happens Shocked :

Quote:
Europeans think that freedom of speech is guaranteed in Europe, and that they are defending it against Islamic pressure. This is a view that is widely propagated and defended by groups from across the political spectrum. Reality, however, presents us Muslims living in Europe with another experience. Muslims and others in Europe can not say everything they often want to say and they risk being arrested and prosecuted if they do. Muslims and other religious people can not express their disgust from homosexuality and clearly state that they believe it's a sickness and a deviation without being persecuted for being homophobic.

People in Europe are not allowed to do a free historical examination of the Second World War and the holocaust and freely express an opinion on it that is different than the dominating dogmatic line. Any attempt to have deviant historical examination of the holocaust will earn you the title of revisionist, anti-Semite and a jail sentence.

You don't even have to go that far, I would be curious to see the reactions of these champions of the freedom of speech in case that same Danish paper would have published pictures of Jewish rabbi's, or Moses for that matter, with a Jewish nose, the star of David and represented him as a greedy banker, or other form of economical parasite sucking the blood of the people referring to stereotypes on Jews. Or of King David with the same typical Jewish features and outfit conspiring together with other Jewish prophets to dominate the world inspired by the protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Yes Arabs and Muslims are uptight when you touch their religious and national symbols, but Europe had made of political correctness and the cult of the Holocaust and Jew-worshiping its alternative religion and is even more uptight when you touch that. Europeans might not respect their flags, and they might laugh with Jesus and Mary but if you touch their new religious symbols, they will bombard you with indignation and persecute you in the best European inquisition tradition.

I am for the absolute freedom of speech everywhere, and that's why I call upon every free sole among Arabs to use the Danish flag as a substitute for toilet paper. To illustrate every wall with graffiti making fun of everything Europe holds as holy: dancing rabbis on the carcasses of Palestinian children, hoax gas-chambers built in Hollywood in 1946 with Steven Spielberg's approval stamp, and Aids spreading fagots. Let us defend the absolute freedom of speech altogether, wouldn't that be a noble cause?


Shocked Sad

As every good rhetorisizer, he manages to weave a couple of good, arguable points into what increasingly becomes a hateful, anti-semitic rant ... Luckily Abou Jahjah, for all the attention he always knows to attract, doesn't exactly represent the mainstream of Dutch/Belgian Muslims (either), his political party bombed in the Belgian elections, and in Holland the effort to set up a party seems to have collapsed even before it gathered steam ... but, damn.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 03:39 pm
Shocked I sincerely hope that what he suggests in that last paragraph was not meant seriously, but I am afraid it was.

When will this stop? This all started because of cartoons! If the Muslims had just ignored them, this whole thing would have gone away! Now, someone has got to take the higher ground here. Question is, who is going to do it?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 03:44 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
That's the one site of stupidity, Steve.

On the other site I wonder, how many really would follow some others and want to die in the ditch, defending the right to abuse a religious leader with a caricature.
Well probably not me if you put it that way Smile But there is a serious issue of free speech here. I've seen a lot worse cartoons featuring Mohammed than the ones that caused this fight, some really offensive ones that I would want nothing to do with. But I say again the Danish cartoons raised serious points. For 'us' to be threatened with death because 'they' are offended by cartoons they probably haven't seen is completely unacceptable.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 03:50 pm
[quote="Steve (as 41ooBut there is a serious issue of free speech here. [/quote]

I know, I know: in the UK you already can't insult minorities, can't say that slavery is alright and the holocaust is a good thing, and now they even want to take the right to insult someone who others regard for their exemplar of all human goodness. Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 04:05 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
[quote="Steve (as 41ooBut there is a serious issue of free speech here.


I know, I know: in the UK you already can't insult minorities, can't say that slavery is alright and the holocaust is a good thing, and now they even want to take the right to insult someone who others regard for their exemplar of all human goodness. Crying or Very sad[/quote]yeah but Roy Keane no long plays for United, he's fair game now at Celtic.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 04:35 pm
Oooo yeah . . . that Mohammed, he was a veritable saint . . . one of the ways you can tell is that he was betrothed to Ayesha when she was six, but he was decent about it, he waited until she turned nine before he actually married her and took her home for a fast game of hide the kielbasa . . .
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 04:45 pm
nimh wrote:
Lord Ellpus wrote:
I am sure that the majority of mainstream muslim followers quietly cheer their brethren, and just pay lip service to us infidels when they say that these hotheads don't represent their religion.

What do you base this on, LE? When the largest organisation of Muslims in Britain (the Muslim Council of Britain) actually called on the police to prosecute these protesters?

Its leader said: "The police should now consider all the evidence they have gathered from the protests to see if they can prosecute the extremists. [..] Ordinary Muslims are fed up with them."


The basis for which I say that I am sure, comes from the basis that I am sure, period.
It is the same as "in my opinion". If I wanted to state it as fact, I would have done, and then faced calls to provide the evidence.

I work day in and day out, with muslim males who have offended in the past and are subject to community orders.
One of the main conditions of a probation order is that they attend regular interviews with their designated officer, in order to discuss their offending behaviour, which invarioubly leads to discussing their life in more general terms.
Some of these orders are for a period of a year or more, so in that time I get to know a person quite well.
The basis that I am sure, comes from the fact that, no matter how many times the conversation turns to their religion, and more specifically the awful events on 7/7, I have never, ever heard one of them say that it was wrong, or denounce it in any way.
It is all well and good for their supposed leaders to say that they have had enough, but where were they, and what did they do, when the evil men moved into their mosques to fill these young muslims with such insensitivity and intolerance?

You read newsbites from muslim leaders, I talk to their young (and not so young) "street" muslims on a daily basis.

I am sure that the majority of the lads I work with are "sad", as opposed to bad or mad, so the likelihood that they would get wrapped up in the serious stuff is pretty minimal.
But they will always have some form of warped justifucation for 7/7, or 9/11. I actually had one say that he was proud that it was muslims who "shafted" the west.

So, I say again, that I am sure that the majority of British muslims sympathise with the nutters cause which resulted in the awful scenes over the weekend.

Their muslim council are merely acknowledging that they have a runaway train. They could have applied the brakes a long time ago, but chose, either through fear, collusion or stupidity, to let it continue to pick up speed.

Now it is the police who are getting the blame for not arresting them, basically because THEY feared the "Political correctness brigade", who would have come down on them like a ton of bricks if a poor fake bomber had been given a bloody nose in the process.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 04:49 pm
Don't you think that could be a bit of a skewed sample, though, in that it is offenders? I have dealt with a lot of Muslims in a university environment -- professors, students -- and they are pretty much universally moderate and outspoken about how this stuff is NOT what Islam is about. Much more in line with what nimh quoted.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 04:51 pm
Lord Ellpus wrote:
I work day in and day out, with muslim males who have offended in the past and are subject to community orders.
[..] Some of these orders are for a period of a year or more, so in that time I get to know a person quite well.
The basis that I am sure, comes from the fact that, no matter how many times the conversation turns to their religion, and more specifically the awful events on 7/7, I have never, ever heard one of them say that it was wrong, or denounce it in any way.

Lord Ellpus, do you think that the Muslim males whom you work with as probation officer are representative for "the majority of mainstream muslim followers", whose views you were saying you were sure about?

How representative are the Brits you encounter in your work as probation officer for the majority of mainstream Brits?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 04:55 pm
I've worked with enough Muslims too - and since I worked in a progressively-minded NGO, they were most all very reasonable, quite secular and very tolerant (if a bit quick to excite).

But I wouldnt dream of saying that the fact that I've gotten to know the Muslims I work with well means that I can be sure that the "majority of mainstream Muslims" thinks like them.

In fact, I'm pretty sure that "the majority of mainstream Muslims" is somewhere in between my relatively enlightened NGO Muslim colleagues and your victim-complex-plagued young Muslim street offenders.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 05:05 pm
sozobe wrote:
Don't you think that could be a bit of a skewed sample, though, in that it is offenders? I have dealt with a lot of Muslims in a university environment -- professors, students -- and they are pretty much universally moderate and outspoken about how this stuff is NOT what Islam is about. Much more in line with what nimh quoted.


These offenders, Soz, may be the only type of muslim that I interact with on a daily basis, but they are nearly always a member of a pretty large group of other young muslims, that hang around together in their spare time.
I would find it hard to believe that it was only the "offender" in the group that thought this way.

I have the highest regard for law abiding, peaceful, reasonable muslims. It is the ever growing number of the other type that worry me.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 05:14 pm
nimh wrote:
I've worked with enough Muslims too - and since I worked in a progressively-minded NGO, they were most all very reasonable, quite secular and very tolerant (if a bit quick to excite).

But I wouldnt dream of saying that the fact that I've gotten to know the Muslims I work with well means that I can be sure that the "majority of mainstream Muslims" thinks like them.

In fact, I'm pretty sure that "the majority of mainstream Muslims" is somewhere in between my relatively enlightened NGO Muslim colleagues and your victim-complex-plagued young Muslim street offenders.


You try working with my lot for a while, Nimh.

I would liken it to the "blood and crips" phenomenon. They would do anything for their "gang", but their "gang" just happens to be countrywide, if not worldwide, and backed by some very sinister puppeteers.

To my mind it is now too late, in the UK. Any effort to change them now, will result in a massive problem.

Look what is happening around the world, over just a silly cartoon.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 05:16 pm
Hi LordE,

Yeah, the other type worry me too. I still haven't fully gotten a grip on this. For a few reasons, my instincts are towards defending the general Muslim population -- I think they have genuinely gotten a bad rap, and are generally tarred with a much wider brush than they deserve. However, I'm fully aware that there is indeed a scary element that needs to be opposed, don't want to minimize that.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 06:17 pm
Lord Ellpus wrote:
You try working with my lot for a while, Nimh.

No thanks! Razz

But you've got my respect for doing so.

Lord Ellpus wrote:
I would liken it to the "blood and crips" phenomenon. They would do anything for their "gang", but their "gang" just happens to be countrywide, if not worldwide, and backed by some very sinister puppeteers.

Absolutely. I think thats probably the right metaphor, and the right description of the motivation of the "foot-soldier" type radical (no different from a Crip's or a Blood's) versus that of the puppeteer's, as well...

But then, what else is new (plus ca change..)
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 06:36 pm
Mr Setanta wrote-

Quote:
Oooo yeah . . . that Mohammed, he was a veritable saint . . . one of the ways you can tell is that he was betrothed to Ayesha when she was six, but he was decent about it, he waited until she turned nine before he actually married her and took her home for a fast game of hide the kielbasa . .


What's that supposed to prove?

I have met hundreds of muslims at cricket matches.Not one of them would recognise your slimey smears.No wonder they get mad with your sort around.

How do you know that stuff.Where have you got it from?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2006 06:53 pm
nimh wrote:
Lord Ellpus wrote:
I would liken it to the "blood and crips" phenomenon. They would do anything for their "gang", but their "gang" just happens to be countrywide, if not worldwide, and backed by some very sinister puppeteers.

Absolutely. I think thats probably the right metaphor, and the right description of the motivation of the "foot-soldier" type radical (no different from a Crip's or a Blood's) versus that of the puppeteer's, as well...

Mind you, I know Moroccans (former colleagues, too) who, as you put it, "have some form of warped justifucation" for 9/11 (though never 7/7). Not that they agreed with it, but just that they couldnt talk about it without adding, to the "of course I it was a terrible thing to do", something that starts with "but" (look at what the Americans did, its no wonder that it would some time turn back at them, does the media pay as much attention when the victims are ... etc). Yet still, those were nowhere near being footsoldiers of Tizb-al-Tahir or the like. Hell, I know plenty of white people who talk like that. I'm guessing the "majority of mainstream Muslims" in our countries are more of such mix-n-match views...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 09:43:11