Experts Claim Official 9-11 Story is a Hoax ! FINALLY!

Amigo, "Jones said he will soon receive a sample of the slag". Now that's interesting and may finally lead to the truth. If thermite is proven that would destroy the governments story. If not it would destroy Jones story.

Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.

They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes, was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the attack.

Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar find profoundly troubling:

* In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?

The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia,

* Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?

* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?

* Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact.

* A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction.

Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints.

I've seen a documentary showing how heat from the burning fuel could soften the girders (especially where inadequately insulated) causing them to distort and come away from their mounting brackets. But the collapse of building 7 really is a mystery, unless it was deemed to be in a dangerous state and deliberately brought down. Was it?

blueflame1 wrote:

Amigo, "Jones said he will soon receive a sample of the slag". Now that's interesting and may finally lead to the truth. If thermite is proven that would destroy the governments story. If not it would destroy Jones story.

Blue:
Thanks for this thread! I hear stuff about this daily either on Pacifica Radio or Link-TV. There are many films, underground, about a Bush conspiracy before he took office. They had to "steal" the election in 2000 to put al f this in place, then keep the public afraid with threats that led to nothing. I still haven't flown since 8/2001, when I took a flight from San Antonio back to the East Coast! 2 weeks later, we had 9-11! I am scared out of my wits because I don't want to be on that random flight! Our lives are worthless to this administration, as long as they think they have the power bamboozle us!

blueflame1 wrote:

Amigo, "Jones said he will soon receive a sample of the slag". Now that's interesting and may finally lead to the truth. If thermite is proven that would destroy the governments story. If not it would destroy Jones story.

Blue:
Thanks for this thread! I hear stuff about this daily either on Pacifica Radio or Link-TV. There are many films, underground, about a Bush conspiracy before he took office. They had to "steal" the election in 2000 to put al f this in place, then keep the public afraid with threats that led to nothing. I still haven't flown since 8/2001, when I took a flight from San Antonio back to the East Coast! 2 weeks later, we had 9-11! I am scared out of my wits because I don't want to be on that random flight! Our lives are worthless to this administration, as long as they think they have the power bamboozle us!

Quote:

20 reasons to question the official story of 9/11

by dailykoster
Tue Jan 31, 2006

Why didn't the WTC crumble or melt from the top down? Why did it all collapse simultaneously?

"Controlled demolition" VS "The fire and jet fuel made the building collapse the way it did"

This debate as far as I know is still going on For a reason. If it's stupid then ignore it.

Was the evidence of controlled demolition addressed by the 9/11 commission?

"No data, no proof, nothing concrete or scientific." That describes the government story.

There has been scientific evidence posted on this thread that says the fires were not hot enough to melt steel.

The government has not proven it's theories.

Steven Jones will be all ears the moment the government tries.

The Twin Towers was built on a steel skeleton which supported the outer walls. The floors were suspended between the steel beams. All that was needed is a failure of some of supporting beams and the weight of the upper floors came crashing down. It's all in the NOVA special and many other non-government generated documents supported by structural engineers, not a bunch of idealogues with an agenda. Much as I disrespect Dubya, I can't pin this one on him.

There have been no other buildings constructed in this manner. It was very experamental and obviously, they aren't about to try it again. Anyone wonder why?

farmerman, ok. So all the etewitnesses who heard explosions in the basement before the collapse are full of crap. The air traffic controllers are full of crap. The flight school instructors are full of crap. Everyone but the Bushies are full of crap.

WTC Basement Blast And Injured Burn Victim Blows 'Official 9/11 Story' Sky High
Eye Witness Testimony Is Conclusive That North Tower Collapsed From Controlled Demolition

Declared a hero for saving numerous lives at Ground Zero, he was the janitor on duty the morning of 9/11 who heard and felt explosions rock the basement sub-levels of the north tower just seconds before the jetliner struck the top floors.

He not only claims he felt explosions coming from below the first sub-level while working in the basement, he says the walls were cracking around him and he pulled a man to safety by the name of Felipe David, who was severely burned from the basement explosions.

All these events occurred only seconds before and during the jetliner strike above. And through it all, he now asks a simple question everybody should be asking? How could a jetliner hit 90 floors above and burn a man's arms and face to a crisp in the basement below within seconds of impact?

"What really upsets me is that we have all these people coming forward with credible testimony about explosions and we have been completely ignored by the 9/11 Commission and the major media," said Rodriguez in a telephone conversation from his New Jersey apartment about what he calls an obvious media and government blackout on any information contrary to the official story that only jet fuel brought down the towers, a theory adopted by the 9/11 Commission.

>What puzzles me about 9/11 is that standard operational proceedures call for a military or air national guard aircraft to investigate all incidents of potential hijacking or irrational aircraft behaviour.

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

>What puzzles me about 9/11 is that standard operational proceedures call for a military or air national guard aircraft to investigate all incidents of potential hijacking or irrational aircraft behaviour.

They didn't have time to figure things out and stop the planes before they crashed.

The timing of the response is described in detail here:

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch1.htm

Scroll down to "1.2 IMPROVISING A HOMELAND DEFENSE"

Air traffic controllers realised as soon the first plane deviated from its flight plan that something was seriously wrong.

Casual observers might have thought it was an accident (until the second plane hit) but air controllers knew from the outset that this was a deliberate attack.