1
   

CANADA'S NEW PRIME-MINISTER TELLS U.S. "TO BUTT OUT"

 
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 10:28 pm
Intrepid wrote:
C'mon. There is one hell of a big difference between quoting an American and selling out our country to them. My sig used to be "God Bless America, but God help Canadians to understand them." That great American, Setanta, accused me of U.S. bashing for using that. It seems that folks can pick what they want to try to make their case.

On the money issue,l you don't seem to understand that at all. And, don't call me comrade. In Canada most medical procedures are paid for. If you go across the boarder and end up in the hospital, you better have lots of money or be smart enought to take out insurance before you leave.
Intrepid you have some good humors, plus you are Canadian, so I will tread lightly on your cherished ideals (for now).

Ok, I will not call you Comrade errr Compatriot errr Canuckistaninian errr Brethren errr Buddy errr Brother errr……..on to the D's……..

And what do you mean "On the money issue, you don't seem to understand that at all" I know my supply side economics from my command economies. So don't hurt my feelings or I'll leave you out of my will, then you'll really get to know the meaning of supply side.

I will only make one serious comment at this point: It does not take a rocket scientist to know that one should have extra medical insurance if you leave Canada. But…..............that in no way reflects negatively on the US (or any other country for that matter) nor does it hold Canada in higher esteem. In fact it is not relevant as to whether the US system has a higher level of efficacy or not, vis-à-vis Canada.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 10:36 pm
Laughing Some Canadian, spelling humour as humor. You are Americanized already. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 10:42 pm
Damn joker Smile
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 10:43 pm
Damn straight
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 10:48 pm
Chumly wrote:
I will only make one serious comment at this point: It does not take a rocket scientist to know that one should have extra medical insurance if you leave Canada. But…..............that in no way reflects negatively on the US (or any other country for that matter) nor does it hold Canada in higher esteem. In fact it is not relevant as to whether the US system has a higher level of efficacy or not, vis-à-vis Canada.


Thank you for that. It is increasingly rare to see even balanced or neutral comments about the U.S. by self-professed Canadians on these threads. Like it or not we are neighbors and have substantial mutual interests, economic, social and security. Canada bashing is not a detectable element of American policy. However its opposite is indeed a prominent part of Canadian politics. This cannot have beneficial long-term effects for either of us.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 10:53 pm
You are more than welcome Smile
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:04 pm
If it was up to me, I would integrate the two countries and be done with the silliness.

Just think what kind of a nifty holiday you could have travelling up the entire west coast of North America without issues. Let alone the absolutly unbeatable ecncomcic powerhouse it would create.

As an added bonus the politics would keep you well entertained. Can you imagine when the melting pot meet multiculturalism? Or when Canada's Official Languages Act gets enforced in Southern California?

How about Bush trying to deal with Quebec separatists……………
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:05 pm
Chumly wrote:
If it was up to me, I would integrate the two countries and be done with the silliness.

Just think what kind of a nifty holiday you could have travelling up the entire west coast of North America without issues. Let alone the absolutly unbeatable ecncomcic powerhouse it would create.

As an added bonus the politics would keep you well entertained. Can you imagine when the melting pot meet multiculturalism? Or when Canada's Official Languages Act gets enforced in Southern California?

How about Bush trying to deal with Quebec separatists……………


Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:08 pm
Chumly wrote:
Hi pachelbel,

As much as I dislike certain aspects of the US, such as the Christians sleeping with the Republicans, the overly ingrained Industrial Military Complex, I would have Canada join the US in a New York minute. The artifice of the border, and the feigning of Canadian independence vis-a-vis the US are not confirmed by the socioeconomic realty of North America.


And you are entitled to your opinion. But the majority of Canadians do NOT want to join the US (and have no health coverage? Shudder). If you like them so much, why not move there? Not hard to get in.

There are a lot of differences between the two countries besides the Parlimentary gov and our monetary system. Canadians as a whole do not advocate violence, do not condone the death penalty, do not own or use guns like the Americans, and we cherish our differences. We are more European-oriented than is the US.

The 'artifice' is of your conjuring but it is certainly real enough to warrant Blackhawk helicopters patrolling along the border.

Personally, I don't favour the love affair Americans have with the military and their orientation to the world, i.e., 'we'll take it if you don't give it to us', or, 'you're either with us or against us' baloney. Canada has always been in the position of peacekeeper. That's why Americans (as has been pointed out here somewhere) like to have the Canadian Maple Leaf on their backpacks/baggage when they travel out of America. Why, do you think?

Canada has resources galore that the US would just love to get their hands on. Water, the most fresh water on earth, gold (the biggest in the world), diamond mines, and that black gold: oil - second only to Saudi Arabia.

I'm sure our ancestors who helped found Canada would agree that Canada should just turn it all over to the Americans. esp. the ones who went to war against the Americans, and won, in 1812.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:10 pm
This is US checking out the (mythical) NW Passage Smile

http://static.flickr.com/37/91765439_d368d46f32.jpg

<Satans Sub - ahahahahaha>
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:11 pm
Do you wish me to seriously reply, or would you prefer humor or humour?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:11 pm
Our standard of living would go down, indeed.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:16 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Our standard of living would go down, indeed.
I thought I already dealt you a deathly blow with my irrefutable logic, affable easy going nature, and rapier wit, and you had agreed to join up with our southern neighbors.






Whenever I give the word of course.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:20 pm
Chumly wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Our standard of living would go down, indeed.
I thought I already dealt you a deathly blow with my irrefutable logic, affable easy going nature, and rapier wit, and you had agreed to join up with our southern neighbors.






Whenever I give the word of course.


I would NEVER agree to that. I have enough issues with many of our large companies being bought by American interests and then downsizing them and putting Canadians out of work. Don't get me started on that.

Besides, there isn't a U.S. city that I have seen that can beat any Canadian city for cleanliness and safety on the streets.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:21 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Chumly wrote:
Hi JustWonders,
I am Canadian and I get so tired of Canada beating it's drum as to how wonderful our health care system is, and how the US's is much inferior.

The propaganda here runs so thick, you'd think crossing the border would be a serous heath hazard. And if you do get sick in the US, you would be assured of a painful death with no medical attention!


Just take lots of money.


Indeed it does! Friends of mine in the States pay over $500 per month for health care. Want to trade our system for their private system? I've always been happy with the care I've received in Canada. I get appts. when I need to, don't wait in ER (the few times I've been there).

Most Western countries in the world have socialized health care. There seems to be some problem with that word 'socialized'. Americans have it confused with communism, or some weird notion. Canada is more 'human' oriented rather than 'destroying other countries oriented'. That's ok with me!

Health care in the States is great - if you're wealthy. But there are too many Americans with no health care and that simply isn't right, in a country supposedly that rich. What are the priorities, anyway? Building war machines?
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:24 pm
pachelbel wrote:
[You are entitled to your hubris, Timber. One can see you're in denial. But that's ok. The world doesn't care much what you think, or what I think. Two percent of the US control 95% of the wealth of the US.

Altho you won't admit it, the US lost the War of 1812 as well as the Vietnam war.

Check out another revolution against a superpower: it was called the American Revolution. Whether it was Washington's scorched earth policy with the Indians of upstate New York, the Boston Tea Party, or tar and feathering English tax collectors, the insurgents also used TERRORIST tactics. There is nothing new under the sun. (Ecclesiastes 1:9). The average age for any empire is 150 years, except for Turkey, Rome, or China. Nothing lasts forever. Not even the mighty, powerful, US of A.

If you're ok supporting the military/industrial complex, feel free. Aren't you glad your paychecks go for purchase of more Blackhawks? Altho, they don't seem to stay up in the air too long......those dang insurgents just aren't grateful to be served American-style democracy on a silver platter, eh?

Sigh.
Cool Life's tough, when you're a superpower...... Rolling Eyes


Just noticed this while perusing the back pages of this thread. Gosh ! How long have you felt this way about us, pachebel? I know we exported most of our Tories to Canada during the revolution, but I thought that their antiquated point of view died with the eighteenth century. Are things a bit dull for you up there?

Loved that bit about the average age of empires (except for Rome, China, etc - i.e. most of them) Where did you find that factoid? I believe that in 1970 when the Portuguese empire in Africa and Asia finally crumbled, it was already over 400 years old. Then of course there was Egypt, Persia, even Athens, the Moguls, Spain, Russia, and of course the British. You also left out the eastern Roman Empire and the Habsburgs.

Impressive ignorance.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:29 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
Intrepid wrote:

Just take lots of money.


And join all the other Canadians down here looking for prompt access to specialists not otherwise available under Canada's socialist system of rationed medical care.


Oh? Is that what your media tells you? Do you personally know of Canadians who have gone to the States for 'prompt' medical access? Rationed medical care? I detect some propaganda here; of course, the US wants you to think Canada has a terrible system because the US cannot afford to fix theirs. I have no complaints about our system at all. I have access to whatever specialist I need and I don't have to go through an HMO, which is money oriented and not patient oriented. Some doctors won't even take patients in the States who have HMO's because they are stuck for how much they can charge, or who their patient can see. In other words, the HMO dictates who the patient will see, not the doctor. Great care, that.

BTW - who are all those elderly people on buses heading to Canada? I hear they are after cheap medicine? Course, it wasn't 'safe' until America needed OUR flu vaccine because they ran out of their supply. Funny how our medicine got safe so quickly eh? Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:36 pm
dadpad wrote:
Quote:
The normal U.S. policy in such conditions is simply to ignore the offending claim and use the straits anyway.


I dont think thats the point. The Canadians would probably be quite happy for the US and other countries to use what may or may not be territorial waters. The point being made by the Canadian prime minister is to retaliate(?) against the arrogance with which America assumes that if we want it thats the way it will be and if you dont like it well just smack you in the mouth. Had the American ambassadore not make such a bald and arrogant statement I feel sure The Canadian prime minister would not have made such a fuss.

A simple request such as "You dont mind if we sail a few ships through the nortwest passage do you" would not have elicited a similar response.

I understand the pro american responses on this thread but they all smack of similar arrogance................
Rule 1. The boss is always right.
Rule 2. If the boss is wrong see rule 1.
and if you dont like it we will use our muscle.

The world seems to be forming a view of Americans as fat, lazy, rude, arrogant and insular. I know all 300 million cant possible be like that but on the evidence I have to hand its hard to argue against.


Hit the nail on the head! Seems anyone outside of the US knows what is going on. The insular Americans don't have a clue, and that will be their downfall.......
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:59 pm
I am having real trouble typing serious critique to my comrade's wild and unfounded assertions. So I will provide just a modest taste. However try and remember my caveat.
Chumly wrote:
As much as I dislike certain aspects of the US, such as the Christians sleeping with the Republicans, the overly ingrained Industrial Military Complex…
pachelbel wrote:
But the majority of Canadians do NOT want to join the US (and have no health coverage? Shudder). If you like them so much, why not move there? Not hard to get in.
It is an extreme position without logic or rationale to say there would be "no health coverage". It is a logical fallacy to suggest "If you like them so much, why not move there? Not hard to get in."
pachelbel wrote:
There are a lot of differences between the two countries besides the Parlimentary gov and our monetary system.
The differences you claim are not an overt logical basis for an argument against integration. Let's start with the US fed versus the Bank of Canada shall we, in terms of interest rate pollicies, real versus actual. They in fact parallel each other.
pachelbel wrote:
Canada has always been in the position of peacekeeper.
Who told you that one, recall WW II perchance?
pachelbel wrote:
That's why Americans (as has been pointed out here somewhere) like to have the Canadian Maple Leaf on their backpacks/baggage when they travel out of America. Why, do you think?
What difference does it make what some people believe, in some countries, as to which flag is less problematic vis-avis their personal belief systems?
pachelbel wrote:
Canada has resources galore that the US would just love to get their hands on. Water, the most fresh water on earth, gold (the biggest in the world), diamond mines, and that black gold: oil - second only to Saudi Arabia.
Again what has this to do with integration? Or are you imply the Us has nothing to offer in return, as that's hardly the case.
pachelbel wrote:
I'm sure our ancestors who helped found Canada would agree that Canada should just turn it all over to the Americans. esp. the ones who went to war against the Americans, and won, in 1812.
Why would a war long over, and people long dead, for a cause of mistaken consequences, be relevant to a better future through integration? Do you understand the intricacies of implications of Ben Franklin's life for example? How about that Canada would have been better off if it had become independent like the US, even better if it has joined the US against England.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:59 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
pachelbel wrote:
[You are entitled to your hubris, Timber. One can see you're in denial. But that's ok. The world doesn't care much what you think, or what I think. Two percent of the US control 95% of the wealth of the US.

Altho you won't admit it, the US lost the War of 1812 as well as the Vietnam war.

Check out another revolution against a superpower: it was called the American Revolution. Whether it was Washington's scorched earth policy with the Indians of upstate New York, the Boston Tea Party, or tar and feathering English tax collectors, the insurgents also used TERRORIST tactics. There is nothing new under the sun. (Ecclesiastes 1:9). The average age for any empire is 150 years, except for Turkey, Rome, or China. Nothing lasts forever. Not even the mighty, powerful, US of A.

If you're ok supporting the military/industrial complex, feel free. Aren't you glad your paychecks go for purchase of more Blackhawks? Altho, they don't seem to stay up in the air too long......those dang insurgents just aren't grateful to be served American-style democracy on a silver platter, eh?

Sigh.
Cool Life's tough, when you're a superpower...... Rolling Eyes


Just noticed this while perusing the back pages of this thread. Gosh ! How long have you felt this way about us, pachebel? I know we exported most of our Tories to Canada during the revolution, but I thought that their antiquated point of view died with the eighteenth century. Are things a bit dull for you up there?

Loved that bit about the average age of empires (except for Rome, China, etc - i.e. most of them) Where did you find that factoid? I believe that in 1970 when the Portuguese empire in Africa and Asia finally crumbled, it was already over 400 years old. Then of course there was Egypt, Persia, even Athens, the Moguls, Spain, Russia, and of course the British. You also left out the eastern Roman Empire and the Habsburgs.

Impressive ignorance.


Ignorance is on your end, bud. It's Hapsburg, not Habsburgs. History lesson will now begin: what we are talking about is world dominance. Look up any of the empires you have listed. None of them remained DOMINANT for more than 150-200 years. Yes, of course it takes time to build an empire, as well as time for decline. During those periods, others rise and fall. Thus, you may not need to, but it would probably be wise for your children to learn Chinese.

The most recent, England, had its day in the sun. England was supreme from 1815 to 1915 with a few lingering twilight years up to the 60's when they lost their colonies. Before that, they were in contest with France and Holland. France of course had already had their day in the sun, those in turn were preceded by Spain and Portugal, who had their time in the 1500-1600's, but were certainly out of the picture by 1700, when the Bourbons of France took Spain's throne, replacing the Hapsburgs. So by mid century the US will have had its 100 years of world dominance and be on the downhill slide -signs of which are already apparent. All failing empires waste their treasure on imported goods and the military to maintain their colonies, to the detriment of their own people and economy. BTW, because Macao was a Portuguese colony up until 1997 does not mean that Portugal was a world power.

What do they say in America? Oh yes, 'Have a nice day".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 12:35:04