I am having real trouble typing serious critique to my comrade's wild and unfounded assertions. So I will provide just a modest taste. However try and remember my caveat.
Chumly wrote:As much as I dislike certain aspects of the US, such as the Christians sleeping with the Republicans, the overly ingrained Industrial Military Complex
pachelbel wrote:But the majority of Canadians do NOT want to join the US (and have no health coverage? Shudder). If you like them so much, why not move there? Not hard to get in.
It is an extreme position without logic or rationale to say there would be "no health coverage". It is a logical fallacy to suggest "If you like them so much, why not move there? Not hard to get in."
pachelbel wrote:There are a lot of differences between the two countries besides the Parlimentary gov and our monetary system.
The differences you claim are not an overt logical basis for an argument against integration. Let's start with the US fed versus the Bank of Canada shall we, in terms of interest rate pollicies, real versus actual. They in fact parallel each other.
pachelbel wrote:Canada has always been in the position of peacekeeper.
Who told you that one, recall WW II perchance?
pachelbel wrote:That's why Americans (as has been pointed out here somewhere) like to have the Canadian Maple Leaf on their backpacks/baggage when they travel out of America. Why, do you think?
What difference does it make what some people believe, in some countries, as to which flag is less problematic vis-avis their personal belief systems?
pachelbel wrote:Canada has resources galore that the US would just love to get their hands on. Water, the most fresh water on earth, gold (the biggest in the world), diamond mines, and that black gold: oil - second only to Saudi Arabia.
Again what has this to do with integration? Or are you imply the Us has nothing to offer in return, as that's hardly the case.
pachelbel wrote:I'm sure our ancestors who helped found Canada would agree that Canada should just turn it all over to the Americans. esp. the ones who went to war against the Americans, and won, in 1812.
Why would a war long over, and people long dead, for a cause of mistaken consequences, be relevant to a better future through integration? Do you understand the intricacies of implications of Ben Franklin's life for example? How about that Canada would have been better off if it had become independent like the US, even better if it has joined the US against England.