Given the premise of the opening gambit
Wilso wrote:I find it absolutely incomprehensible that a rational human being could possibly believe in an omnipotent, all knowing, all seeing being.My opinion sways between seeing religionists as needing education and counselling, to needing heavy medication and to be locked in a padded room where they can't do any damage.
Chumly must pose the following:
Can any action be wholly justified on the basis of rationality alone or (as I tend to contend) must there at least be an inkling of some version of emotionalism, idealism, spirituality, superstition, religiosity, shoe fashions, dogs as pets and cigarettes (rhymes) etc. playing a part?