1
   

The Spiritual and/or Religious beliefs of an Atheist

 
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 05:22 pm
c.i.- I had started this thread when you were not frequenting A2K. I think that you might find it interesting:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=63888
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 05:27 pm
I found something very interesting when I was searching for my thread. The article said that the word apatheist started to circulate around 2000. Check out my post, that was written in 2003, and the response by Maraso.
In those years, I considered myself an atheist, but have subsequently modified my views:


http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=71918#71918
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 05:30 pm
Atheist still defines me; no middle ground of any kind for me.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 05:31 pm
Phoenix32890 wrote:
but have subsequently modified my views
Is that like changing your mind? Razz
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 05:31 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Atheist still defines me; no middle ground of any kind for me.


Whatever floats your boat!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 05:43 pm
I live by a simple rule; keep my life simple. Wink
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 05:44 pm
Having worked in accounting as a career, we have a tendency to see mostly black and white, and rarely greys.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 06:11 pm
Frank, you know I love you like a brother. However, it is your belief that there is no way to choose between believing in a god and being an atheist. You state that often enough it has to be a belief. The reason I can say with confidence that I am an atheist is that I am not caught up by the deist's made up concepts. I don't have to have evidence why a made up something does not exist. One needn't be a scientist or philosopher to grasp so plain a fact. Peace.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 06:29 pm
Hi edgarblythe,

Fair enough but how to explain a purely theoretical physics postulate which at some much later date become potentially factual? Give it no credence at all unless or until proven otherwise?

Granted a purely theoretical physics postulate is likely a far cry from the inane religious dogma of popular religions. But the premise of the existence of some god versus Atheism is perhaps another matter.

That's why I am leaning towards skeptical agnosticism.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 06:32 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
Frank, you know I love you like a brother. However, it is your belief that there is no way to choose between believing in a god and being an atheist. You state that often enough it has to be a belief. The reason I can say with confidence that I am an atheist is that I am not caught up by the deist's made up concepts. I don't have to have evidence why a made up something does not exist. One needn't be a scientist or philosopher to grasp so plain a fact. Peace.

Quoted for truth.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 06:32 pm
To me, the concept of a god far removed from dogma is but a variation of the theme, and therefore no different or more enlightened. And I say that in the kindest tone of voice, using non threatening body language.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 06:46 pm
Well you won't get an argument out of me as you make your point well.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 06:59 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
Frank, you know I love you like a brother. However, it is your belief that there is no way to choose between believing in a god and being an atheist. You state that often enough it has to be a belief. The reason I can say with confidence that I am an atheist is that I am not caught up by the deist's made up concepts. I don't have to have evidence why a made up something does not exist. One needn't be a scientist or philosopher to grasp so plain a fact. Peace.

Doktor wrote:
Quoted for truth.

c.i. writes:
Clear and concise. I especially like "I don't have to have evidence why a made up something does not exist."
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 07:39 pm
My opinion..

2+2=4 (believers)

2+2=1,2,3....,5,6,7......eternity (Atheist)

2+2=0 (sophist)

2+2=? .. ?....... !*.. =4 (realist)
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 07:42 pm
that's quite an opinion, does it mean anything?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 07:45 pm
Vroodie.
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 07:46 pm
Dear Dyslexia
Only I wanted to express what I think on believers or nonbelievers. No deep mean.. only little idea..
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 07:50 pm
kev wrote:
My opinion..

2+2=4 (believers)

Question: If believers are rational (2+2 = 4), please show proof of 1) god, 2) Noah's ark or world flood, 3) creation in six, 24-hour days, and 4) why god supports slavery.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 08:00 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
kev wrote:
My opinion..

2+2=4 (believers)

Question: If believers are rational (2+2 = 4), please show proof of 1) god, 2) Noah's ark or world flood, 3) creation in six, 24-hour days, and 4) why god supports slavery.
And please, limit your reply to a single paragraph. Laughing
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Mar, 2006 08:04 pm
to Mr.Cicerone about Nouh
for example,

When the sky is rent asunder * Heeding [the command of] its Sustainer, as in truth it must. * And when the earth is levelled * And casts out what is within it and becomes empty * And it heeds [the command of] its Sustainer, as in truth it must.16

This explains in a truly elevated style the degree of submission and obedience to Almighty God's command of the skies and the earth. It is like this: just as a commander-in-chief opens two offices to accommodate the matters necessary for fighting, like one for strategy and one for the enrollment of soldiers, and when those matters are accomplished and the fighting is over, he addresses himself to the two offices in order to convert them into something else for some other business, they both say, either through the tongues of those employed in them or through their own tongues: "O Chief! Give us a short respite so that we can clean up the bits and pieces of the former business and throw them out, then you may honour us with your presence. There, we have thrown them out, we await your command. Order what you wish. We hear and obey! Everything you do is true, good, and beneficial."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 07:01:11