FreeDuck wrote:DontTreadOnMe wrote:FreeDuck wrote:If all immigrants have to take the same test, then I think it's ok. If it's given only to musliims, then it is discriminatory.
yup.
a soverign nation has the right to allow or deny entry to any and all immigrants.
to me, the scenario becomes much clearer when i think about it in terms of who i will, or will not, allow into my home.
btw, how's the new pond, ducks ?
Hiya, DTOM. The water's fine in the new pond.
The reason why I say it should not be applied to just Muslims is that I can imagine fundamentalists of any religion giving unsatisfactory answers to such questions.......If they are only concerned with fundamentalist Islam, well, that's something different.
absolutely.
this, like communism during the cold war and the anarchists of the late 1800s / early 1900s, is a very tough row to hoe. more so because of the religious component. people of good will don't tend to judge others solely on their religion.
that said, it is true that there are fundimentalist zealots in all religions that don't seem to bear much in the way of good will and use another's differing spiritual beliefs as the
only test of moral viability. in some cases, we know that that sensibility extends to the test of whether or not someone of another belief deserves to live.
not a good thing, to me.
unfortunately, the islamic fundis fall into that column.
so now we are left with only a few options, none of which are particularly natural to an open and free society.
do we simply stop all immigration ? become a nation (world?) of xenophobes?
do we attack
every nation that has religious fundimentalists zealots? careful, this could be a tricky question
do we scrutinize only potential immigrants that fit the profile most likely to be an islamic fundi radical ?
or, do we cast a suspicious eye on everyone ?
fairness tells me that we should maybe take a discriminating look at
everyone who wishes to enter. and yet, parodoxically, it seems unfair to grill the daylights out of someone who is much less likely to be, in this case, an islamic radical.
but even that view leaves us unsure of a person's intent. there's no way of knowing what a person is
really thinking, is there ?
any ideas ?