1
   

How Should a Christian Act?

 
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Dec, 2005 10:50 pm
J_B,
You are certainly entitled to your opinion on this. Some of us look at it differently. If what you believe was so, then the Church would have died when Jesus died. Jesus, however, was resurrected and sits at the side of His Father. The church has carried on. Jesus was sent that all the world would be saved. The time is something that we do not, and will not know until it is come. In the meantime, the offer of salvation is made to everyone.
0 Replies
 
queen annie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 03:32 am
Momma Angel wrote:
queen annie,

Are you and yours okay? I cannot imagine going through an earthquake. I hope everything is all right.


Just fine. Thanks for asking.

To be perfectly honest, I didn't even know it happened! My mom told me at dinner time that day, because it had been on the news. Not a bulletin, just the regular news. 20 miles away, too. Laughing We are strange here in the desert.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 05:43 am
MOAN, in referring to earthquakes and other natural disasters, wrote:
Yes, they have. But not with the same regularity nor the on the same scale of force. There are other things.


This is nonsense--you have no basis upon which to make comparisons.

A single sterling example--Krakatoa . . .

Wikipedia wrote:


I'm not going to link it, my search for the single word Krakatoa generated 785,000 results, so that anyone interested kind find loads of information. It might be argued that the recent tsunami killed more people--although that is by no means certain, given the lack of the means to determine, record and report the total number of deaths and injuries in 1883. At all events, the islands which now comprise Indonesia were not nearly as densely populated in 1883 as they now are, by orders of magnitude. The ash cloud darkened skies right around the planet.

Were such disasters increasing in frequency and magnitude, then the number and severity of such events would have been increasing in the one hudred twenty-two years since Krakatoa exploded--but the evidence that this is so simply does not exist. When Mount St. Helen's erupted in 1980, the loss of life was minimal, both because of the direction in which the ejetca was thrown and because the sparsely populated areas involved were evactuated before hand. People driving on the expressways in Seattle were able to watch the eruption as it occured. Had this been one in a series of cataclysmic events corresponding to "the end of days," why was the very heavily populated area at the very doorstep of the mountain spared?

The case for an alleged increase in natural disasters is based entirely upon a desire to believe such things are occuring--and not on any good evidence. It is abetted by the increase in the quality and quantity of news reporting in our age. Had there been an earthquake as destructive or more destructive in the Punjab and Kashmir two or three hundred years ago as that recently reported, the "christian" world simply would not have known about it.

The millenarians have been peddling this crap for a long time. I suspect that when i lie on my deathbed, they'll still be peddling it.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 07:02 am
You seem to think that the number of lives lost, in some way, equates with the end days. It is about a lot more than the number of volcano eruptions over a given period. This is a very poor attempt at trying to discredit what someone has said.

It is interesting that you came back to edit and add all the other stuff. You were much better off when you only had the first line.... "This is nonsense--you have no basis upon which to make comparisons"
0 Replies
 
Questioner
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 07:14 am
Intrepid wrote:
J_B,
You are certainly entitled to your opinion on this. Some of us look at it differently. If what you believe was so, then the Church would have died when Jesus died.

Untrue. This is what martyr's are good for. They give people something to rally around long after they've stopped caring.

Quote:
Jesus, however, was resurrected and sits at the side of His Father. The church has carried on. Jesus was sent that all the world would be saved. The time is something that we do not, and will not know until it is come. In the meantime, the offer of salvation is made to everyone.


A pleasant thought. Now if he'd just help me out with my bills this month, I mean come ON! It's HIS birthday i'm buying all these presents for, isn't it?
0 Replies
 
Questioner
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 07:20 am
Intrepid wrote:
You seem to think that the number of lives lost, in some way, equates with the end days. It is about a lot more than the number of volcano eruptions over a given period. This is a very poor attempt at trying to discredit what someone has said.


Intrepid,

Stating an increase in hurricane activity, volcano eruptions, and weather patterns in general is a poor reason to go sit on a mountaintop and wait for some fiery chariot to descend and pick you up.

Given the apparent age of the world, you can fit what we know about global weather patterns in a thimble. And as I've stated before in other threads:

Thess 5
1Now, brothers, about times and dates we do not need to write to you, 2for you know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. 3While people are saying, "Peace and safety," destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape.


You won't be able to predict it. It won't come amidst a fiery clash of volcanoes and earthquakes. The Gloom and Doom tripe simply doesn't correlate to this passage.

Or is this one of those that we're supposed to ignore?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 07:39 am
J_B wrote:
Well, this is where we disagree. Jesus might have said that to the twelve but given that he thought the end was imminent, I don't think he ever intended anyone else to take on the banner (and don't bring up Paul, I don't want to get into it) so NO, I don't think Jesus intended "us" to carry on the banner or the message.
"And Jesus approached and spoke to them, saying: "All authority has been given me in heaven and on the earth. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded YOU. And, look! I am with YOU all the days until the conclusion of the system of things"(Matthew 28: 18-20)
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:05 am
Questioner wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
You seem to think that the number of lives lost, in some way, equates with the end days. It is about a lot more than the number of volcano eruptions over a given period. This is a very poor attempt at trying to discredit what someone has said.


Intrepid,

Stating an increase in hurricane activity, volcano eruptions, and weather patterns in general is a poor reason to go sit on a mountaintop and wait for some fiery chariot to descend and pick you up.

Given the apparent age of the world, you can fit what we know about global weather patterns in a thimble. And as I've stated before in other threads:

Thess 5
1Now, brothers, about times and dates we do not need to write to you, 2for you know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. 3While people are saying, "Peace and safety," destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape.


You won't be able to predict it. It won't come amidst a fiery clash of volcanoes and earthquakes. The Gloom and Doom tripe simply doesn't correlate to this passage.

Or is this one of those that we're supposed to ignore?


I do believe that I already stated above that this is the case. Who said that the end would come amid volcanoes and earthquakes? Not me.

Nobody knows when the Lord will come. At least you seem to agree that he will come.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:09 am
Questioner wrote:
Quote:
A pleasant thought. Now if he'd just help me out with my bills this month, I mean come ON! It's HIS birthday i'm buying all these presents for, isn't it?


YOU are the one that foolishly spent all that money.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:21 am
Do you have a point, neo? Quoting Matthew, the anti-Semite, might make you feel good, but Matthew was not exactly an eye-witness and not exactly without an agenda. There's an interesting new book out by Ron Miller and Laura Bernstein which does a fascinating study of Matthew. It's called "Healing the Jewish-Christian Rift", you might find it informative. I tend to rely on the earlier Gospels to discern the message of Jesus. Matthew did a fabulous job of filling in the blanks as required by Hebrew scripture, but it isn't exactly a story without a mission.

Also, the literal translation of disciples is "learners". Matthew defines it as those who follow Jesus. Learning about the message from the twelve does not conflict with your quote.
0 Replies
 
Questioner
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:22 am
Intrepid wrote:
Questioner wrote:
Quote:
A pleasant thought. Now if he'd just help me out with my bills this month, I mean come ON! It's HIS birthday i'm buying all these presents for, isn't it?


YOU are the one that foolishly spent all that money.


Right, i'm sending back that shiney new gold collar I'd bought for you.
0 Replies
 
Questioner
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:23 am
Quote:
Nobody knows when the Lord will come. At least you seem to agree that he will come.


Actually, haven't made my mind up about this yet. I'm just going by what I've read in the bible for now.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:26 am
Intrepid wrote:
J_B,
You are certainly entitled to your opinion on this. Some of us look at it differently. If what you believe was so, then the Church would have died when Jesus died. Jesus, however, was resurrected and sits at the side of His Father. The church has carried on. Jesus was sent that all the world would be saved. The time is something that we do not, and will not know until it is come. In the meantime, the offer of salvation is made to everyone.


What about the 144,000 or whatever the magic number is? We're all entitled to our opinions, Intrepid. Mine is that living the message of right relations will do no harm, independent of any faith practice. Spending energies in Christian salvation of others is not in the message and the energies of trying to save others can be better spent elsewhere.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:30 am
Intrepid wrote:
You seem to think that the number of lives lost, in some way, equates with the end days. It is about a lot more than the number of volcano eruptions over a given period. This is a very poor attempt at trying to discredit what someone has said.


To take a page from your playbook--yes, your attempt to discredit what i've written is very poor. The amount of ejecta from a volcano, the loss of life from the eruption and the resultant tsunami are measures of the magnitude of the event. MOAN's contention is that there are more natural disasters now than there previously were and that they are of a greater severity, and this equates with the "end of days." Therefore, that is relevant because of a point she tried to make, not me.

Quote:
It is interesting that you came back to edit and add all the other stuff. You were much better off when you only had the first line.... "This is nonsense--you have no basis upon which to make comparisons"


Indeed, i did give consideration to what i'd written, and the fact that as it stood, it was simply a bald assertion, without other reference. In the interest of providing more for those who read here, i added a good deal more. People have a right to know what motivates someone's assertion, and i provided a very good example of just exactly what i meant--something MOAN always fails to do with her feeble "well, that's just what i believe" comments. Apart from that, my objection to millinarian nonsense is not based soley upon the lack of referrants, but also upon the fallacy of a contention that there are more and more severe natural disasters occuring. I offered examples of the basis of my contention that MOAN deals in self-serving fallacy out of respect for the intelligence of others who read here--and certainly not because i have any expectation that minds as closed as yours and hers will be changed.

To expand on this topic, whether or not you like to see it, millenarians were a major part of the religious landscape in England in the mid-seventeenth century, a period of upheaval from which Congregationalists and Presbyterians emerged as doctrinal evolutions of the Calvinism of the Scots Kirk and the English Puritans. In particular, this took the form of the "fifth monarchy" millenarians.

Wikipedia wrote:
Millenarianism (sometimes spelled millenarism or millennarism) is the belief by a religious, social, or political group or movement in a coming major transformation of society after which all things will be changed in a positive (or sometimes negative or ambiguous) direction. Millennialism Millennialism (or chiliasm), from millennium, which literally means "thousand years", is primarily a belief expressed in some Christian denominations, and literature, that there will be a Golden Age or Paradise on Earth where "Christ will reign" prior to the final judgment and future eternal state, primarily derived from the book of Revelation 20:1-6. Millennialism as such is a specific form of Millenarianism.

Millenarian groups typically claim that the current society and its rulers are corrupt or unjust and will be destroyed soon by a powerful force. The evil nature of the status quo is always considered intractable without the anticipated dramatic change. In Medieval millenarianism the world was seen as controlled by demons In folklore, mythology, and religion, a demon or demoness is a supernatural being that has generally been described as a malevolent spirit but outside Christian circles was viewed as a sort of elemental spirit: compare Daemon and djinn. A demon is frequently depicted as a force that may be conjured and insecurely controlled. The "good" demon in recent use is largely a literary device (eg: Maxwell's demon). In common language, "demonizing" one's oponent is to define him or her as an evil person.

In the modern world economic rules or vast conspiracies are seen as generating oppression. Only dramatic change will change the world and change will be brought about, or survived, by a group of the devout and dedicated. In most millenarian scenarios, the disaster or battle to come will be followed by a new, purified world in which the true believers will be rewarded.


Wikipedia wrote:
The Fifth Monarchists or Fifth Monarcy Men were active from 1649 to 1661 during the Interregnum, following the English Civil Wars of the 1600s. They took their name from a belief in a world ruling kingdom to be established by the returning Jesus in which the year 1666 and its numerical relationship to a passage in the Biblical Book of Revelations indicating the end of earthly rule by carnal human beings. (I am not responsible for the linguistic ineptitude of the person or persons at Wikipedia who wrote this paragraph.)


The Fifth Monarchy Men were suppressed by the Parliament after 1660 when Charles Stuart returned from exile on the continent and the monarchy was restored with him mounting the throne as Charles II. The year 1666 inspired them to even more wild-eyed fanaticism because of the plague of 1665, and the great fire in London in 1666. However, as the years wore on, and the plague did not return, and the city was rebuilt, and with no returning Savior in sight--the Fifth Monarchists faded away.

In the mildest form, millenarianism contends that a new era of peace and prosperity will soon dawn on the planet. In its most extreme and virulent form, cults such as the Branch Davidian "heretics" who followed David Koresh will be willing to immolate themselves to help the process along (the Branch Davidians rejected Koresh and his followers even before the seige at Waco). These extreme acts of group suicide have been seen in other places and at other times, as well. In the reign of the Tsar Alexei Mikhailovitch, the second Romanov Tsar, the Patriarch, Nikon, reformed the liturgy of the Russian Orthodox chruch. One significant reform was to prohibit the priests from keeping mistresses and to prohibit the marriage of priests, and to turn women out of the monasteries; what seemed a small matter at the time was to insist that people use two fingers when crossing themselves rather than three. The results were far-reaching--there was a rebellion against church authority at the lowest levels. Only one Bishop opposed Nikon, but many priests and monks, losing their mistresses and their comfortable lifestyles, rebelled against the reform, and convinced their superstitious peasant followers that they were going straight to Hell if they crossed themselves without using the appropriate number of fingers. Once again, a small matter, but the effect was profound. Literally tens of thousands of "Old Believers" ran away--some to hide in the northern woods, others to seek refuge in the Ukraine, where the Russian peasant had always fled to seek freedom and sanctuary among the Cossacks.

In the northern woods, the more extreme of the priests and the monks set up communities such as Koresh established at Waco. Just like Koresh's cult, they barricaded their compounds when the Tsar's troops approached (they didn't pay taxes and they didn't send young men for the military levies, and so were seen as being in open rebellion). When it became apparent that they would be overrun by the Tsar's troops, they frequently packed into the church, barred the door, and burned the church to the ground, killing themselves in the process. There is, indeed, nothing new under the sun.

************************************

The Old Believers gradually gave up their extremism, and as their priests died off, and fewer priests from the "New Believers" came to them, they were obliged to give up their notion of the approach of "the millenium," and to establish a regular theology and episcopacy in order to survive as a church. The Fifth Monarchists in England in the late 17th century faded away as the wait for the arrival of the Savior grew longer and longer, and the plague and the London fire proved to be signs of nothing more than poor medical services and a lack of effective civic methods of fire prevention--rather than the wages of sin at the end of days.

The year 2000 stirred up a recent rage for the end of days scenario. When that year came and went with no apocalypse. the most extreme of millenarian groups broke up and the members scattered. The less extreme millenarians who had confidently predicted the end of days can now be found asserting that 2000 was not the end, but rather, the beginning of the end. I rather suspect that by the end of this century, they will be looking for a new date for the second coming, and new signs that the end of days is nigh.

Ignorance is a wonderful comfort to those who wish to believe silly things.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:30 am
J_B wrote:
Do you have a point, neo? Quoting Matthew, the anti-Semite, might make you feel good, but Matthew was not exactly an eye-witness and not exactly without an agenda. There's an interesting new book out by Ron Miller and Laura Bernstein which does a fascinating study of Matthew. It's called "Healing the Jewish-Christian Rift", you might find it informative. I tend to rely on the earlier Gospels to discern the message of Jesus. Matthew did a fabulous job of filling in the blanks as required by Hebrew scripture, but it isn't exactly a story without a mission.

Also, the literal translation of disciples is "learners". Matthew defines it as those who follow Jesus. Learning about the message from the twelve does not conflict with your quote.
Are you saying there are some parts of the bible that have less authority than others? What may a disciple learn from that?
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:36 am
I'm saying the bible is a manifestation of the Church and does not have authority in the least. The message of right relations can be found in parts of the bible, in noncanonical scripture, in scripture of other faith beliefs, and in the inherent conscience of all humanity. If you concentrate on the message and not on the story it all boils down to the Christmas soundbite of, "Peace on earth, goodwill toward men."

Gotta run, have a nice day.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:38 am
Intrepid wrote:
Who said that the end would come amid volcanoes and earthquakes?


MOAN, for one . . .
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:39 am
J_B wrote:
I'm saying the bible is a manifestation of the Church and does not have authority in the least. The message of right relations can be found in parts of the bible, in noncanonical scripture, in scripture of other faith beliefs, and in the inherent conscience of all humanity. If you concentrate on the message and not on the story it all boils down to the Christmas soundbite of, "Peace on earth, goodwill toward men."

Gotta run, have a nice day.
There are, of course, certain consequences to your assertion.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:41 am
I'm the other one wrote:
Wonder where Sentata ran off to...

I just got started. Sad


It was out of a desire not to inflame the topic that i did not respond to you. Your goofy post about the "signs" of the "end of days" was tempting, but i resisted the temptation.

However, you do inspire me to heap ridicule upon the witless contentions found therein--so if you're game . . .
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 08:41 am
Yeah, world peace. Can you imagine?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 5.13 seconds on 06/14/2025 at 07:59:40