@engineer,
engineer wrote:
Before we switch to healthcare...
If you trusted Bush, did you trust every single person in government working for him? Bush didn't approve all the wiretaps and investigations, so you must have trusted the entire chain of command. Pretty naive if you ask me. We routinely see police violate the privacy of the famous and near famous just to get a few bucks from tabloids. The current administration was the one that killed this investigation.
No, but in regard to wiretaps, I have done very very little calling overseas, but of the calls I have made, there were none to any suspicious numbers, so I do not think there would have been any chance whatsoever that my calls would have been flagged, and even if they were, I had nothing to hide, nothing. In contrast, I see very little to no logical reason why the government needs to access the identity of peoples computers that accesses a website. I see little reason for doing that in terms of corellating suspicious persons. Maybe I am missing something here, but I do not understand how this could track down a terrorist for example. It seems more likely it might track down people with certain political profiles instead, which is more objectionable to me, and it appears to lend itself to motivations other than tracking down terrorists.
Quote:As for government healthcare, the government already does a great job administering the healthcare program for government employees. I think most Americans without coverage would be happy to have that system.
That may be your opinion, but I doubt it is universal. Speaking for myself, I am quite happy with my own insurance and health care and I object to the government meddling with it, and I believe most Americans agree with me. Besides, I think what they are doing is unconstitutional.