The sad thing about torture is that it doesnt even work - it makes some people confess everything, regardless of whether they did it or not, and (rare) others confess nothing, when they make complete resistance their survival strategy. Neither way you get anything resembling reliable evidence.
Furthermore, the use of torture endangers the chance of subsequent success of any kind of judicial prosecution against the suspects. The end result may well be that the suspect gets to walk off scot free even if he
did do it, because the fact of his confession having been acquired by torture gets him off.
Two examples of that, lately:
-
Four facing deportation on security claims given bail
Summary:
Quote:Four Algerians who are facing deportation from the UK on the grounds that they are a threat to national security were granted bail yesterday by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission. Home Office lawyers had claimed that they were involved in "creating the climate, the motivation and the opportunity that led to the" London bombing. They were bailed as it emerged that the British security and intelligence agencies accept evidence about suspected terrorists, even though it might have been obtained through torture abroad.
-
Torture claims 'forced US to cut terror charges'
Summary:
Quote:The Bush administration decided not to charge Jose Padilla with planning to detonate a radioactive "dirty bomb" in a US city because the evidence against him was extracted using torture on members of al-Qaida. Padilla was indicted on the lesser charges of supporting terrorism abroad instead. Government officials said he could not be charged with the bomb plots because neither of the captured al-Qaida leaders from whom the information came could be used as witnesses, as they could open up charges from defence lawyers that their statements resulted from torture. An internal review by the CIA inspector general found that Mohammed had suffered excessive use of "waterboarding", a technique involving near drowning which entails the detainee being strapped to a board and then submerged.
Hmm ... that raises a new question for DD's list, in answer to McG's question here:
Strapping a detainee to a board and nearly drowning him, over and over and over again ... "true torture" - or would that just be the kind of liberal use of the word that makes it meaningless?